27121Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#FI and RE v TUIfly GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5 – Article 7 – Article 8(3) – Denied boarding, cancellation or long delay of a flight – Compensation and assistance to passengers – Concept of ‘cancellation’ – Diversion of a flight to an airport not serving the same town, city or region as that for which the booking was made – Re-routing of passengers by coach.#Case C-253/21.cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27122Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 6 October 2021.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Interim relief – Order on interim measures – Article 163 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Change in circumstances – No such change – Jurisdiction of the Izba Dyscyplinarna (Disciplinary Chamber) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Disciplinary regime applicable to the judges of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court), of the ordinary courts and of the administrative courts – Procedure for review of the conditions for the independence of those judges – Suspension of application of national provisions.#Case C-204/21 R.cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27123Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 6 October 2021.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Interim relief – Order on interim measures – Article 163 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Change in circumstances – No such change – Jurisdiction of the Izba Dyscyplinarna (Disciplinary Chamber) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Disciplinary regime applicable to the judges of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court), of the ordinary courts and of the administrative courts – Procedure for review of the conditions for the independence of those judges – Suspension of application of national provisions.#Case C-204/21 R.cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27124Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#José María Castillejo Oriol v Kingdom of Spain.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Actions for failure to act – Application lodged by means of e-Curia – Article 56a(4) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Non-compliance with 10-day time limit – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-145/21 P.cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27125Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#José María Castillejo Oriol v Kingdom of Spain.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Actions for failure to act – Application lodged by means of e-Curia – Article 56a(4) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Non-compliance with 10-day time limit – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-145/21 P.cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27126Case C-621/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 October 2021 — WS v Intervyuirasht organ na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite pri Ministerskia savetcjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27127Case C-620/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 October 2021 — Momtrade Ruse OOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihoditecjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27128Case C-617/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg (Germany) lodged on 6 October 2021 — RU, PO v Nissan Leasing, Volkswagen Leasing GmbHcjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27129Case C-316/21: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Belgium) — Monument Vandekerckhove NV v Stad Gent (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 2014/24/EU — Conduct of the procedure — Choice of participants and award of contracts — Article 63 — Tenderer relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority — Failure to meet the requirements relating to the technical and professional ability of the tenderer by the entity on whose capacities the tenderer intends to rely — Obligation to allow that tenderer to replace that entity — Principle of proportionality)cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27130Case C-253/21: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — TUIfly GmbH v FI, RE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5 — Article 7 — Article 8(3) — Denied boarding, cancellation or long delay of a flight — Compensation and assistance to passengers — Concept of ‘cancellation’ — Diversion of a flight to an airport not serving the same town, city or region as that for which the booking was made — Re-routing of passengers by coach)cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27131Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#NZ v European Commission.#Staff case – Officials – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/1/AD 10/18 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the competition reserve list – Obligation to state reasons – Secrecy of the proceedings of the selection board – Broad discretionary power of the selection board – Failure to communicate the intermediate marks and the weighting of the components of the oral test.#Case T-668/20.cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27132Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#NZ v European Commission.#Staff case – Officials – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/1/AD 10/18 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the competition reserve list – Obligation to state reasons – Secrecy of the proceedings of the selection board – Broad discretionary power of the selection board – Failure to communicate the intermediate marks and the weighting of the components of the oral test.#Case T-668/20.cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27133Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Dermavita Company SARL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark JUVÉDERM VOLITE – Late payment of the appeal fee – Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Article 101(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 106(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Restitutio in integrum.#Case T-637/20.cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27134Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Dermavita Company SARL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark JUVÉDERM VOLITE – Late payment of the appeal fee – Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Article 101(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 106(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Restitutio in integrum.#Case T-637/20.cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27135Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Dermavita Company SARL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark JUVÉDERM VOLUMA – Late payment of the appeal fee – Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Article 101(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 106(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Restitutio in integrum.#Case T-636/20.cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27136Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Dermavita Company SARL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark JUVÉDERM VOLUMA – Late payment of the appeal fee – Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Article 101(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 106(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Restitutio in integrum.#Case T-636/20.cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27137Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Dermavita Company SARL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark JUVÉDERM VYBRANCE – Late payment of the appeal fee – Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Article 101(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 106(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Restitutio in integrum.#Case T-635/20.cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27138Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Dermavita Company SARL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark JUVÉDERM VYBRANCE – Late payment of the appeal fee – Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Article 101(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 106(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Restitutio in integrum.#Case T-635/20.cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27139Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#LP v European Parliament.#Civil service – Accredited parliamentary assistants – Refusal to offer employment – Conditions of employment – Character references – Manifest error of assessment – Due diligence.#Case T-519/20.cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.
27140Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#LP v European Parliament.#Civil service – Accredited parliamentary assistants – Refusal to offer employment – Conditions of employment – Character references – Manifest error of assessment – Due diligence.#Case T-519/20.cjeu_case · 6 октября 2021 г.