Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
26561

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. v European Commission and Republic of Poland.#Appeal – State aid – Toll-motorway concession – Law providing for an exemption from tolls for certain vehicles – Compensation granted to the concession holder by the Member State for loss of revenue – Shadow toll – Compensation found by the European Commission to be excessive and to include State aid – Commission decision declaring that aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Procedural rights of the aid beneficiary – Commission’s obligation to exercise particular vigilance – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Advantage – Improvement of the concession holder’s expected financial situation – Criterion of the private operator in a market economy – Distortion of the evidence – Breach of the obligation to state reasons – Misreading of the decision at issue – Substitution of grounds – Reversal of the burden of proof – Breach of the principle of primacy of EU law – Judicial review to be conducted by the General Court – Requirements and limits.#Case C-933/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
26562

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 11 novembre 2021.#Procédure pénale contre Ivan Gavanozov.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive 2014/41/UE – Décision d’enquête européenne en matière pénale – Article 14 – Recours – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Article 47 – Absence de voies de recours dans l’État membre d’émission – Décision ordonnant des perquisitions, des saisies et une audition de témoin par vidéoconférence.#Affaire C-852/19.

cjeu_case ·
26563

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#Criminal proceedings against Ivan Gavanozov.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European investigation order in criminal matters – Article 14 – Legal remedies – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Absence of legal remedies in the issuing Member State – Decision ordering searches, seizures and a hearing of a witness by videoconference.#Case C-852/19.

cjeu_case ·
26564

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#Stichting Cartel Compensation and Equilib Netherlands BV v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 81, 84 and 85 EC – Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Conduct of undertakings in the context of air transport between the European Economic Area (EEA) and third countries that occurred under Articles 84 and 85 EC – Claim for compensation for damage suffered – Jurisdiction of national courts to apply Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.#Case C-819/19.

cjeu_case ·
26565

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#Stichting Cartel Compensation and Equilib Netherlands BV v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 81, 84 and 85 EC – Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Conduct of undertakings in the context of air transport between the European Economic Area (EEA) and third countries that occurred under Articles 84 and 85 EC – Claim for compensation for damage suffered – Jurisdiction of national courts to apply Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.#Case C-819/19.

cjeu_case ·
26566

Case C-948/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas — Lithuania) — UAB ‘Manpower Lit’ v E.S., M.L., M.P., V.V., R.V. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Temporary work — Directive 2008/104/EC — Article 1 — Scope of application — Concepts of ‘public undertaking’ and ‘pursuit of an economic activity’ — EU agencies — The European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) as a ‘user undertaking’, pursuant to Article 1(2) of that Directive — Article 5(1) — Principle of equal treatment — Basic working and employment conditions — Concept of ‘same job’ — Regulation (EC) No 1922/2006 — Article 335 TFEU — Principle of administrative autonomy of an EU institution — Article 336 TFEU — Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union)

cjeu_case ·
26567

Case C-938/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Energieversorgungscenter Dresden-Wilschdorf GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme — Article 2(1) — Scope — Article 3(e) — Concept of ‘installation’ — Effect on emissions and pollution — Ancillary units not generating as such greenhouse gas emissions — Article 10a — Transitional rules for free allocation of allowances — Data Collection Template — Corrected eligibility ratio — Method of calculation — Decision 2011/278/EU — Third subparagraph of Article 6(1) — Export of cooling to an entity that belongs to a sector exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage)

cjeu_case ·
26568

Case C-933/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2021 — Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. v European Commission, Republic of Poland (Appeal — State aid — Toll-motorway concession — Law providing for an exemption from tolls for certain vehicles — Compensation granted to the concession holder by the Member State for loss of revenue — Shadow toll — Compensation found by the European Commission to be excessive and to include State aid — Commission decision declaring that aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Procedural rights of the aid beneficiary — Commission’s obligation to exercise particular vigilance — Concept of ‘State aid’ — Advantage — Improvement of the concession holder’s expected financial situation — Criterion of the private operator in a market economy — Distortion of the evidence — Breach of the obligation to state reasons — Misreading of the decision at issue — Substitution of grounds — Reversal of the burden of proof — Breach of the principle of primacy of EU law — Judicial review to be conducted by the General Court — Requirements and limits)

cjeu_case ·
26569

Case C-852/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against Ivan Gavanozov (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2014/41/EU — European Investigation Order in criminal matters — Article 14 — Legal remedies — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Absence of legal remedies in the issuing Member State — Decision ordering searches, seizures and a hearing of a witness by videoconference)

cjeu_case ·
26570

Case C-819/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam- Netherlands) — Stichting Cartel Compensation, Equilib Netherlands BV v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 81, 84 and 85 EC — Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Cartels — Conduct of undertakings in the air transport sector between the European Economic Area (EEA) and third countries which took place when Articles 84 and 85 EC were in force — Action for damages — Jurisdiction of national courts to apply Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement)

cjeu_case ·
26574

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#PIK-KO AD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark P.I.C. Co. – Earlier national figurative mark PIK – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Declaration of partial invalidity.#Case T-73/21.

cjeu_case ·
26575

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#PIK-KO AD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark P.I.C. Co. – Earlier national figurative mark PIK – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Declaration of partial invalidity.#Case T-73/21.

cjeu_case ·
26576

Case T-73/21: Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2021 — PIK-KO v EUIPO — Haribo Ricqles Zan (P.I.C. Co.) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark P.I.C. Co. — Earlier national figurative mark PIK — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Declaration of partial invalidity)

cjeu_case ·
26577

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 10 November 2021.#Comercializadora Eloro SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170a of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-415/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
26578

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 10 November 2021.#Comercializadora Eloro SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170a of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-415/21 P.

cjeu_case ·