Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
26341

Case C-488/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie — Poland) — Delfarma sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Rejestracji Produktów Leczniczych, Wyrobów Medycznych i Produktów Biobójczych (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 34 and 36 TFUE — Free movement of goods — Measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction — Medicinal products for human use — Parallel import of medicinal products — Legislation of a Member State under which a parallel import licence is to expire automatically after one year from the expiry of the marketing authorisation for the reference medicinal product — Protection of the health and life of humans — Proportionality — Directive 2001/83/EC — Pharmacovigilance)

cjeu_case ·
26342

Case C-372/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht — Austria) — QY v Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Wien für den 8., 16. und 17. Bezirk (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 45 et 48 TFEU — Freedom of movement for workers — Equal treatment — Family benefits for development aid workers who take their family members to the third country to which they have been posted — Discontinuation — Article 288, second paragraph TFEU — Legal acts of the European Union — Scope of regulations — National legislation with a wider personal scope than that of a regulation — Conditions — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 11(3)(a) and (e) — Scope — Employed person who is a national of a Member State employed as a development aid worker by an employer established in another Member State and sent on mission to a third country — Article 68(3) — Right of the applicant for family benefits to submit a single application to the institution of the Member State having primary jurisdiction or to the institution of the Member State having subsidiary jurisdiction)

cjeu_case ·
26343

Case C-334/20: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Veszprémi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Amper Metal Kft v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 2 — Transaction subject to VAT — Concept — Article 168(a) and Article 176 — Right to deduct input VAT — Refusal — Advertising services categorised as excessively expensive and not beneficial by the tax authority — Lack of turnover generated by the taxable person)

cjeu_case ·
26345

Case C-271/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Aurubis AG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Free allocation of allowances — Decision 2011/278/EU — Article 3(d) — Fuel benchmark sub-installation — Concepts of ‘combustion’ and ‘fuel’ — Primary copper production by flash smelting — Request for allocation — Allowances requested and not yet allocated on the date of expiry of a trading period — Possibility of issuing such allowances during the subsequent trading period by way of enforcement of a judicial decision given after that date)

cjeu_case ·
26347

Case C-233/20: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — WD v job-medium GmbH, in liquidation (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2003/88/EC — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Article 7(1) — Right to an allowance in lieu of paid annual leave not taken before the end of the employment relationship — Early termination of the employment relationship by the employee)

cjeu_case ·
26348

Case C-102/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — StWL Städtische Werke Lauf a.d. Pegnitz GmbH v eprimo GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2002/58/EC — Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector — Article 2(h) — Concept of ‘electronic mail’ — Article 13(1) — Concept of ‘use of … electronic mail for the purposes of direct marketing’ — Directive 2005/29/EC — Unfair commercial practices — Annex I, point 26 — Concept of ‘persistent and unwanted solicitations by email’ — Advertising messages — Inbox advertising)

cjeu_case ·
26349

Case C-25/20: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Višje sodišče v Ljubljani — Slovenia) — Proceedings brought by NK, acting as liquidator in the insolvency of Alpine BAU GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Insolvency proceedings — Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 — Articles 4 and 28 — Article 32(2) — Time limit for the lodging of claims in insolvency proceedings — Lodging, in secondary insolvency proceedings ongoing in a Member State, of claims by the liquidator in the main proceedings pending in another Member State — Compulsory time limit laid down by the law of the State in which secondary insolvency proceedings have been opened)

cjeu_case ·
26350

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg v L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation – Directive 2011/16/EU – Article 1(1), Article 5 and Article 20(2) – Request for information – Decision ordering that information be provided – Refusal to comply with the order – Penalty – ‘Foreseeable relevance’ of the requested information – Absence of identification of the taxpayers concerned individually and by name – Concept of ‘identity of the person under examination or investigation’ – Statement of reasons of the request for information – Scope – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy against the decision ordering that information be provided – Article 52(1) – Limitation – Respect for the essence of the right.#Case C-437/19.

cjeu_case ·
26351

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg v L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation – Directive 2011/16/EU – Article 1(1), Article 5 and Article 20(2) – Request for information – Decision ordering that information be provided – Refusal to comply with the order – Penalty – ‘Foreseeable relevance’ of the requested information – Absence of identification of the taxpayers concerned individually and by name – Concept of ‘identity of the person under examination or investigation’ – Statement of reasons of the request for information – Scope – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy against the decision ordering that information be provided – Article 52(1) – Limitation – Respect for the essence of the right.#Case C-437/19.

cjeu_case ·
26352

Case C-437/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative — Luxembourg) — État luxembourgeois v L (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation — Directive 2011/16/EU — Article 1(1), Article 5 and Article 20(2) — Request for information — Decision ordering that information be provided — Refusal to comply with the order — Penalty — ‘Foreseeable relevance’ of the requested information — Absence of identification of the taxpayers concerned individually and by name — Concept of ‘identity of the person under examination or investigation’ — Statement of reasons of the request for information — Scope — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy against the decision ordering that information be provided — Article 52(1) — Limitation — Respect for the essence of the right)

cjeu_case ·
26357

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2021.#YP v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2019 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Comparison of merits – Use of languages in the context of duties performed by officials assigned to linguistic duties and by officials assigned to duties other than linguistic – Seniority in grade – Presumption of innocence – Article 9 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Duty to state reasons – Compliance with a settlement agreement.#Case T-581/20.

cjeu_case ·
26358

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2021.#YP v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2019 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Comparison of merits – Use of languages in the context of duties performed by officials assigned to linguistic duties and by officials assigned to duties other than linguistic – Seniority in grade – Presumption of innocence – Article 9 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Duty to state reasons – Compliance with a settlement agreement.#Case T-581/20.

cjeu_case ·
26359

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 November 2021.#Jeronimo Martins Polska S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Riviva – Earlier EU word mark RIVELLA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Partial rejection of the application for registration – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-551/20.

cjeu_case ·
26360

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 November 2021.#Jeronimo Martins Polska S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Riviva – Earlier EU word mark RIVELLA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Partial rejection of the application for registration – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-551/20.

cjeu_case ·