Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
26062

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 December 2021.#RY v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Temporary staff – Action for annulment – Termination of a contract of indefinite duration pursuant to Article 47(c)(i) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union – Right to be heard – Compliance with a judgment annulling a measure – Article 266 TFEU – confirmatory of the initial compliance check decision – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-193/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
26063

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 December 2021.#RY v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Temporary staff – Action for annulment – Termination of a contract of indefinite duration pursuant to Article 47(c)(i) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union – Right to be heard – Compliance with a judgment annulling a measure – Article 266 TFEU – confirmatory of the initial compliance check decision – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-193/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
26068

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 9 décembre 2021.#BT contre Seguros Catalana Occidente et EB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile et commerciale – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Compétence judiciaire, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Compétence en matière d’assurances – Demande en réparation du préjudice subi par un particulier domicilié dans un État membre à la suite d’un accident survenu dans un logement loué dans un autre État membre – Action intentée par la personne lésée contre, d’une part, l’assureur et, d’autre part, l’assuré, propriétaire de ce logement – Applicabilité de l’article 13, paragraphe 3, de ce règlement.#Affaire C-708/20.

cjeu_case ·
26069

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 December 2021.#BT v Seguros Catalana Occidente and EB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the County Court at Birkenhead.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement in civil and commercial matters – Jurisdiction in insurance matters – Claim for compensation for damage suffered by an individual domiciled in a Member State following an accident in rented accommodation in another Member State – Action brought by the injured person against, first, the insurer and, secondly, against the insured owner of that accommodation – Applicability of Article 13(3) of that regulation.#Case C-708/20.

cjeu_case ·
26070

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 December 2021.#Agrochem-Maks d.o.o. v European Commission.#Appeal – Plant protection products – Active substance – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Article 6(f) – Annex II, point 2.2 – Definition of ‘further confirmatory information’ – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Article 13(3) – Non-renewal of approval of the active substance ‘oxasulfuron’ for its placing on the market – Scope of the rapporteur Member State’s decision to declare the application for renewal to be admissible – Right of that Member State and of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to require the applicant to provide further information – Right of the rapporteur Member State to amend its draft renewal assessment report – Precautionary principle.#Case C-374/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
26071

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 December 2021.#Agrochem-Maks d.o.o. v European Commission.#Appeal – Plant protection products – Active substance – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Article 6(f) – Annex II, point 2.2 – Definition of ‘further confirmatory information’ – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Article 13(3) – Non-renewal of approval of the active substance ‘oxasulfuron’ for its placing on the market – Scope of the rapporteur Member State’s decision to declare the application for renewal to be admissible – Right of that Member State and of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to require the applicant to provide further information – Right of the rapporteur Member State to amend its draft renewal assessment report – Precautionary principle.#Case C-374/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
26072

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 9 décembre 2021.#Pro Rauchfrei e.V. contre JS e.K.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fabrication, présentation et vente de produits du tabac – Directive 2014/40/UE – Étiquetage et conditionnement – Article 8, paragraphe 8 – Avertissements sanitaires devant figurer sur chaque unité de conditionnement d’un produit du tabac ainsi que sur tout emballage extérieur – Distributeur automatique de paquets de cigarettes – Avertissements sanitaires invisibles de l’extérieur – Représentation des unités de conditionnement – Notion d’“image” d’unités de conditionnement et de tout emballage extérieur destinée aux consommateurs de l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-370/20.

cjeu_case ·
26073

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 December 2021.#Pro Rauchfrei eV v JS e.K.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Directive 2014/40/EU – Labelling and packaging – Article 8(8) – Health warnings which must appear on each unit packet of a tobacco product and any outside packaging – Automatic vending machine for cigarette packets – Health warnings not visible from the outside – Representation of unit packets – Concept of ‘images’ of unit packets and any outside packaging targeting consumers in the European Union.#Case C-370/20.

cjeu_case ·
26074

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 9 décembre 2021.#HRVATSKE ŠUME d.o.o., Zagreb contre BP Europa SE.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (CE) no 44/2001 – Article 5, point 3 – Notion de “matière délictuelle ou quasi délictuelle” – Procédure judiciaire d’exécution – Action en répétition de l’indu fondée sur l’enrichissement sans cause – Article 22, point 5 – Exécution des décisions – Compétence exclusive.#Affaire C-242/20.

cjeu_case ·
26075

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 December 2021.#HRVATSKE ŠUME d.o.o., Zagreb v BP Europa SE.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Article 5(3) – Concept of ‘matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict’ – Judicial enforcement proceedings – Action for recovery of sums unduly paid based on unjust enrichment – Article 22(5) – Enforcement of judgments – Exclusive jurisdiction.#Case C-242/20.

cjeu_case ·
26078

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 9 décembre 2021.#Kemwater ProChemie s. r. o. contre Odvolací finanční ředitelství.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 168 – Droit à déduction de la taxe acquittée en amont – Conditions matérielles du droit à déduction – Qualité d’assujetti du fournisseur – Charge de la preuve – Refus du droit à déduction lorsque le véritable fournisseur n’a pas été identifié – Conditions.#Affaire C-154/20.

cjeu_case ·
26079

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 December 2021.#Kemwater ProChemie s. r. o. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 168 – Right to deduct input tax – Material conditions governing the right of deduction – Supplier’s status as taxable person – Burden of proof – Refusal of the right of deduction where the true supplier has not been identified – Conditions.#Case C-154/20.

cjeu_case ·
26080

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 9 December 2021.#Criminal proceedings against BV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Fraudulent concealment of tax due – Penalties – National legislation which provides for an administrative penalty and a criminal penalty for the same acts – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 49 – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the principle ne bis in idem – Requirement to provide for clear and precise rules – Possibility of taking into account the interpretation of national legislation by national courts – Need to provide for rules ensuring the proportionality of all of the penalties imposed – Penalties of different kinds.#Case C-570/20.

cjeu_case ·