Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
26022

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 13 December 2021.#Cora v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-619/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
26023

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 13 December 2021.#Cora v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-619/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
26024

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 13 December 2021.#Abitron Germany GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-589/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
26025

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 13 December 2021.#Abitron Germany GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-589/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
26028

Order of the Court of 13 December 2021.#Asolo LTD and WeMO Brands BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-387/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
26029

Order of the Court of 13 December 2021.#Asolo LTD and WeMO Brands BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-387/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
26030

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021.#KQ v Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Definition of ‘employment conditions’ – Exemption from providing on-call medical services on the grounds of age granted solely to permanent workers.#Case C-226/21.

cjeu_case ·
26031

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021.#KQ v Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo nº 1 de Toledo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Definition of ‘employment conditions’ – Exemption from providing on-call medical services on the grounds of age granted solely to permanent workers.#Case C-226/21.

cjeu_case ·
26032

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021.#VX v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Direct taxation – Taxation of capital gains from property – Articles 63 and 65 TFUE – Free movement of capital – Discrimination – Higher tax liability on capital gains on immovable property made by non-residents – Election for taxation under the same procedures as residents.#Case C-224/21.

cjeu_case ·
26033

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021.#VX v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Direct taxation – Taxation of capital gains from property – Articles 63 and 65 TFUE – Free movement of capital – Discrimination – Higher tax liability on capital gains on immovable property made by non-residents – Election for taxation under the same procedures as residents.#Case C-224/21.

cjeu_case ·
26034

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021.#Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM) v BF.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Field of public health – Calculation of length-of-service increments – National legislation refusing to take into account, as regards permanent staff regulated under administrative law, for the purpose of calculating length-of-service increments, periods corresponding to activities temporarily exercised in a higher professional category.#Case C-151/21.

cjeu_case ·
26035

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021.#Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM) v BF.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Field of public health – Calculation of length-of-service increments – National legislation refusing to take into account, as regards permanent staff regulated under administrative law, for the purpose of calculating length-of-service increments, periods corresponding to activities temporarily exercised in a higher professional category.#Case C-151/21.

cjeu_case ·
26039

Case C-226/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 1 de Toledo — Spain) — KQ v Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM) (Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Concept of ‘employment conditions’ — Exemption from providing on-call medical services on the grounds of age granted solely to permanent workers)

cjeu_case ·
26040

Case C-224/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — VX v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Direct taxation — Taxation of capital gains on immovable property — Articles 63 and 65 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Discrimination — Higher tax liability on capital gains on immovable property made by non-residents — Election for taxation under the same procedures as residents)

cjeu_case ·