25921Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#Euro Delta Danube Srl v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură - Centrul Judeţean Tulcea.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Area-related aid scheme – Single area payment – Eligibility criteria – Concession agreement for agricultural land – Change of use of that land without the agreement of the grantor – Agricultural use of areas intended for aquaculture use – Difference between the area declared and the area determined – Over-declaration – Administrative penalties.#Case C-225/20.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25922Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 16 décembre 2021.#Procédure pénale contre AB e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Mandat d’arrêt européen – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Champ d’application – Article 51 – Mise en œuvre du droit de l’Union – Décision-cadre 2002/584/JAI – Compétence de la Cour – Renvoi effectué avant l’émission d’un mandat d’arrêt européen – Recevabilité – Principe ne bis in idem – Article 50 – Notions d’“acquittement” et de “condamnation” – Amnistie dans l’État membre d’émission – Décision définitive d’interruption des poursuites pénales – Révocation de l’amnistie – Annulation de la décision d’interruption des poursuites pénales – Reprise des poursuites – Nécessité d’une décision rendue à la suite d’une appréciation de la responsabilité pénale de la personne concernée – Directive 2012/13/UE – Droit à l’information dans le cadre des procédures pénales – Champ d’application – Notion de “procédure pénale” – Procédure législative pour l’adoption d’une résolution relative à la révocation d’une amnistie – Procédure juridictionnelle de contrôle de la conformité de cette résolution avec la Constitution nationale.#Affaire C-203/20.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25923Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#Criminal proceedings against AB and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava III.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Scope – Article 51 – Implementation of EU law – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Jurisdiction of the Court – Reference made before the issue of a European arrest warrant – Admissibility – Principle ne bis in idem – Article 50 – Concepts of ‘acquittal’ and ‘conviction’ – Amnesty in the issuing Member State – Final decision discontinuing a criminal prosecution – Revocation of the amnesty – Setting-aside of the decision discontinuing the criminal prosecution – Resumption of proceedings – Need for a decision taken after a determination of the criminal liability of the person concerned – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Scope – Concept of ‘criminal proceedings’ – Legislative procedure for the adoption of a resolution relating to the revocation of an amnesty – Judicial procedure for review of the compliance of that resolution with the national Constitution.#Case C-203/20.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25924Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 16 December 2021.#J v H Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 2(a) – Concept of ‘judgment’ – Order for payment made in another Member State after a summary contested examination of a judgment given in a third State – Article 39 – Enforceability in Member States.#Case C-568/20.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25925Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 16 December 2021.#Somogy Megyei Kormányhivatal v Upfield Hungary Kft.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Provision of food information to consumers – Labelling – Mandatory particulars – List of ingredients – Specific name of those ingredients – Addition of a vitamin to a food – Obligation to indicate the specific name of that vitamin – No obligation to indicate the vitamin formulation used.#Case C-533/20.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25926Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 16 December 2021.#CityRail a.s. v Správa železnic, státní organizace.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Úřad pro přístup k dopravní infrastruktuře.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFUE – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria relating to the body’s constitution and function – Exercise of judicial or administrative functions – Directive 2012/34/EU – Articles 55 and 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Independent regulatory authority for the sector – Entitlement to act on an ex-officio basis – Power to impose penalties – Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-453/20.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25927Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 16 December 2021.#S v Familienkasse Niedersachsen-Bremen der Bundesagentur für Arbeit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Bremen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Freedom of movement of persons – Equal treatment – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 24(1) and (2) – Social security benefits – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 4 – Family benefits – Exclusion of nationals of other Member States who are economically inactive during the first three months of residence in the host Member State.#Case C-411/20.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25928Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 16 December 2021.#HOLD Alapkezelő Befektetési Alapkezelő Zrt. v Magyar Nemzeti Bank.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2009/65/EC – Undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) – Directive 2011/61/EU – Alternative investment funds – Remuneration policies and practices in respect of the senior managers of a UCITS management company or manager of an alternative investment fund – Dividends distributed to certain senior managers – Concept of ‘remuneration’ – Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property.#Case C-352/20.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25929Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 16 December 2021.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v XC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Right to family reunification – Directive 2003/86/EC – Article 4(1), first subparagraph, point (c) – Concept of ‘minor child’ – Article 16(1)(b) – Concept of ‘real family relationship’ – Child applying for family reunification with her father who has obtained refugee status – Relevant date for assessing status as a minor.#Case C-279/20.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25930Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 16 December 2021.#European Commission v Stefano Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, as heir of Livio Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Maria Letizia Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, as heir of Livio Missir Mamachi di Lusignano.#Appeal – Civil service – Non-contractual liability of the European Union based on a failure of an institution to fulfil its duty to ensure the protection of its officials – Delegation of the European Commission in Morocco – Murdered official – Non-material damage suffered by the official’s brother and sister – Remedy – Articles 270, 268 and 340 TFEU – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Articles 40, 42b, 55a, 73, 90 and 91 – Concept of a ‘person to whom the Staff Regulations apply’ – Statement of reasons.#Case C-54/20 P.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25931Case C-575/20: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Apollo Tyres (Hungary) Kft. v Innovációért és Technológiáért Felelős Miniszter (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Atmospheric pollution — System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Directive 2003/87/EC — Installations for the combustion of fuels — Annex I — Total rated thermal input — Rules for calculation — Aggregation rule)cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25932Case C-274/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Massa — Italy) — GN, WX v Prefettura di Massa Carrara — Ufficio Territoriale del Governo di Massa Carrara (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 63 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Road traffic — Registration and taxation of motor vehicles — Driver residing in a Member State — Vehicle registered in another Member State — Vehicle provided free of charge for a short period — National legislation prohibiting persons who have resided in Italy for more than 60 days from driving in that Member State a vehicle registered in another country)cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25933Case C-225/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa — Romania) — Euro Delta Danube SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură — Centrul Judeţean Tulcea (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Common agricultural policy — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 — Area-related aid scheme — Single area payment — Eligibility criteria — Concession agreement for agricultural land — Change of use of that land without the agreement of the grantor — Agricultural use of areas intended for aquaculture use — Difference between the area declared and the area determined — Over-declaration — Administrative penalties)cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25934Case C-203/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava III — Slovakia) — Criminal proceedings against AB and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Scope — Article 51 — Implementation of EU law — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Jurisdiction of the Court — Reference made before the issue of a European arrest warrant — Admissibility — Principle ne bis in idem — Article 50 — Concepts of ‘acquittal’ and ‘conviction’ — Amnesty in the issuing Member State — Final decision discontinuing a criminal prosecution — Revocation of the amnesty — Setting-aside of the decision discontinuing the criminal prosecution — Resumption of proceedings — Need for a decision taken after a determination of the criminal liability of the person concerned — Directive 2012/13/EU — Right to information in criminal proceedings — Scope — Concept of ‘criminal proceedings’ — Legislative procedure for the adoption of a resolution relating to the revocation of an amnesty — Judicial procedure for review of the compliance of that resolution with the national Constitution)cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25935Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 16 décembre 2021.#Procédure pénale contre HP.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Décision d’enquête européenne – Directive 2014/41/UE – Article 2, sous c), i) – Notion d’“autorité d’émission” – Article 6 – Conditions d’émission d’une décision d’enquête européenne – Article 9, paragraphes 1 et 3 – Reconnaissance d’une décision d’enquête européenne – Décision d’enquête européenne visant à obtenir des données relatives au trafic et des données de localisation liées aux télécommunications, émise par un procureur désigné comme “autorité d’émission” par l’acte national transposant la directive 2014/41 – Compétence exclusive du juge, dans le cadre d’une procédure nationale similaire, pour ordonner la mesure d’enquête indiquée dans cette décision.#Affaire C-724/19.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25936Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#Criminal proceedings against HP.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European Investigation Order (EIO) – Directive 2014/41/EU – Article 2(c)(i) – Concept of ‘issuing authority’ – Article 6 – Conditions for issuing an EIO – Article 9(1) and (3) – Recognition of an EIO – EIO seeking to obtain traffic and location data associated with telecommunications, issued by a public prosecutor designated as ‘issuing authority’ by the national measure transposing Directive 2014/41 – Exclusive competence of the judge, in a similar domestic case, to order the investigative measure indicated in that order.#Case C-724/19.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25937Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 16 décembre 2021.#UBS Real Estate Kapitalanlagegesellschaft mbH contre Agenzia delle Entrate.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Libre circulation des capitaux – Fonds communs de placement de type fermé – Fonds communs de placement de type ouvert – Investissements dans des biens immobiliers – Taxes de transcription et d’inscription au livre foncier – Avantage fiscal réservé aux seuls fonds immobiliers de type fermé – Différence de traitement – Comparabilité des situations – Critères objectifs de différenciation.#Affaires jointes C-478/19 et C-479/19.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25938Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#UBS Real Estate Kapitalanlagegesellschaft mbH v Agenzia delle Entrate.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Closed-ended mutual investment funds – Open-ended mutual investment funds – Investments in real estate – Mortgage registration tax and land registry fees – Tax advantage granted only to closed-ended real estate investment funds – Difference in treatment – Comparability of situations – Objective criteria of differentiation.#Joined Cases C-478/19 and C-479/19.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25939Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 16 December 2021.###cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.
25940Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 16 December 2021.#Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe and Ireland v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid implemented by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery – Tax ruling – Advantage – Selectivity – Arm’s length principle – Reference framework – National law applicable – ‘Normal’ taxation.#Joined Cases C-885/19 P and C-898/19 P.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2021 г.