25841Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Criminal proceedings against PM and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie and Tribunalul Bihor.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Decision 2006/928/EC – Mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption – Legal nature and effects – Binding on Romania – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Fight against corruption – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Article 325(1) TFEU – ‘PFI’ Convention’ – Criminal proceedings – Decisions of the Curtea Constituțională (Constitutional Court, Romania) concerning the legality of the taking of certain evidence and the composition of judicial panels in cases of serious corruption – Duty on national courts to give full effect to the decisions of the Curtea Constituțională (Constitutional Court) – Disciplinary liability of judges in case of non-compliance with such decisions – Power to disapply decisions of the Curtea Constituțională (Constitutional Court) that conflict with EU law – Principle of primacy of EU law.#Joined Cases C-357/19, C-379/19, C-547/19, C-811/19 and C-840/19.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25842Case C-934/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2021 — Algebris (UK) Ltd, Anchorage Capital Group LLC v Single Resolution Board (SRB) (Appeal — Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms — Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Single Resolution Board (SRB) — Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español SA — Sale of business tool — Write-down and conversion of capital instruments — Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 — Article 20 — Concept of ‘definitive valuation’ — Consequences — Refusal or failure to proceed with an ex post definitive valuation — Remedies — Action for annulment)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25843Case C-876/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2021 — PlasticsEurope AISBL v European Chemicals Agency, French Republic, ClientEarth (Appeal — Establishment of a list of substances subject to authorisation — List of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Updating of the entry of the substance bisphenol A as a substance of very high concern)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25844Case C-874/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2021 — Aeris Invest Sàrl v Single Resolution Board (SRB) (Appeal — Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms — Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Single Resolution Board (SRB) — Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español SA — Sale of business tool — Write-down and conversion of capital instruments — Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 — Article 20 — Concept of ‘definitive valuation’ — Consequences — Refusal or failure to proceed with an ex post definitive valuation — Remedies — Action for annulment)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25845Joined Cases C-357/19, C-379/19, C-547/19, C-811/19 and C-840/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, Tribunalul Bihor — Romania) — Criminal proceedings against PM (C-357/19), RO (C-357/19), SP (C-357/19), TQ (C-357/19), KI (C-379/19), LJ (C-379/19), JH (C-379/19), IG (C-379/19), FQ (C-811/19), GP (C-811/19), HO (C-811/19), IN (C-811/19), NC (C-840/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Decision 2006/928/EC — Mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption — Legal nature and effects — Binding on Romania — Rule of law — Judicial independence — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Fight against corruption — Protection of the European Union’s financial interests — Article 325(1) TFEU — ‘PFI’ Convention — Criminal proceedings — Decisions of the Curtea Constituțională (Constitutional Court, Romania) concerning the legality of the taking of certain evidence and the composition of judicial panels in cases of serious corruption — Duty on national courts to give full effect to the decisions of the Curtea Constituțională (Constitutional Court) — Disciplinary liability of judges in case of non-compliance with such decisions — Power to disapply decisions of the Curtea Constituțională (Constitutional Court) that conflict with EU law — Principle of primacy of EU law)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25846Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Zoi Apostolopoulou and Anastasia Apostolopoulou-Chrysanthaki v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Grant agreements concluded in the context of various EU programmes – Breach of contractual terms by the beneficiary company – Eligible costs – OLAF investigation – Liquidation of the company – Recovery from the partners in the company – Enforcement – Allegations made by the representatives of the Commission before the national courts – Identification of the defendant – Failure to have regard to procedural requirements – Partial inadmissibility – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Joined Cases T-721/18 and T-81/19.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25847Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Zoi Apostolopoulou and Anastasia Apostolopoulou-Chrysanthaki v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Grant agreements concluded in the context of various EU programmes – Breach of contractual terms by the beneficiary company – Eligible costs – OLAF investigation – Liquidation of the company – Recovery from the partners in the company – Enforcement – Allegations made by the representatives of the Commission before the national courts – Identification of the defendant – Disregard of formal requirements – Partial inadmissibility – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Joined Cases T-721/18 and T-81/19.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25848Joined Cases T-721/18 and T-81/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Apostolopoulou and Apostolopoulou-Chrysanthaki v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Grant agreements concluded in the context of various EU programmes — Breach of contractual terms by the beneficiary company — Eligible costs — OLAF investigation — Liquidation of the company — Recovery from the partners in the company — Enforcement — Allegations made by the representatives of the Commission before the national courts — Identification of the defendant — Failure to have regard to procedural requirements — Partial inadmissibility — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25849Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Cater contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme – Eligible costs – Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced – Reliability of the time records – Conflict of interests.#Case T-190/17.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25850Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Cater contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme – Eligible costs – Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced – Reliability of the time records – Conflict of interests.#Case T-190/17.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25851Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Humabio contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme – Eligible costs – Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced – Reliability of the time records – Conflict of interests.#Case T-189/17.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25852Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Humabio contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme – Eligible costs – Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced – Reliability of the time records – Conflict of interests.#Case T-189/17.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25853Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Ask-it contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme – Eligible costs – Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced – Reliability of the time records – Conflict of interests – Subcontracting.#Case T-177/17.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25854Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Ask-it contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme – Eligible costs – Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced – Reliability of the time records – Conflict of interests – Subcontracting.#Case T-177/17.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25855Case T-190/17: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — EKETA v Commission (Arbitration clause — Cater contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme — Eligible costs — Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced — Reliability of the time records — Conflict of interests)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25856Case T-189/17: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — EKETA v Commission (Arbitration clause — Humabio contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme — Eligible costs — Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced — Reliability of the time records — Conflict of interests)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25857Case T-177/17: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — EKETA v Commission (Arbitration clause — Ask-it contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme — Eligible costs — Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced — Reliability of the time records — Conflict of interests — Subcontracting)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25858Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. v European Commission.#State aid – Airport infrastructure – Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Advantage – Market economy operator principle – Effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Recovery – Withdrawal of a decision – Failure to re-open the formal investigation procedure – Procedural rights of the interested parties – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-263/15 RENV.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25859Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. v European Commission.#State aid – Airport infrastructure – Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Advantage – Market economy operator principle – Effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Recovery – Withdrawal of a decision – Failure to re-open the formal investigation procedure – Procedural rights of the interested parties – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-263/15 RENV.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25860Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Gmina Kosakowo v European Commission.#State aid – Airport infrastructure – Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Advantage – Market economy operator principle – Effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Recovery – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-209/15.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.