25781Case T-587/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — MO v Council (Civil service — Officials — Compulsory reassignment — 2019 Appraisal exercise — Right to be heard — Liability)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25782Case T-573/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — MG v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Remuneration — Family allowances — Refusal to grant allowances to non-custodial parent — Conciliation procedure — Reasonable time — Liability)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25783Case T-549/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO — KMA Concepts (SUPERZINGS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark SUPERZINGS — Earlier international figurative mark ZiNG — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25784Case T-409/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — KS v Frontex (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed-term contract — Termination of the contract — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Article 47(b)(ii) of the CEOS — Right to be heard — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Requests for assistance and compensation — Action for annulment and compensation)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25785Case T-381/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Datax v REA (Arbitration clause — Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — HELP and GreenNets grant agreements — OLAF’s investigation — Personnel costs — Burden of proof — Reliability of timesheets — Ineligibility of costs declared by the beneficiary — Request for recovery — Debit notes — Limitation — Reasonable time — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25786Case T-369/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 –EFFAS v EUIPO — CFA Institute (CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst — Earlier EU word mark CFA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25787Case T-159/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Hamers v Cedefop (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Investigation conducted by OLAF — Transmission to national judicial authorities of information relating to facts liable to lead to criminal proceedings — National criminal proceedings — Acquittal — Cedefop’s conduct in relation to the national criminal proceedings — Rejection of the claim for compensation — Action for annulment and damages — Conflict of interests — Presumption of innocence — Powers of Cedefop’s Board of Appeal)cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25788Case T-6/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Dr. Spiller v EUIPO — Rausch (Alpenrausch Dr. Spiller) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Alpenrausch Dr. Spiller — Earlier EU word mark RAUSCH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25789Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#P. Krücken Organic GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Action for damages – Conditions governing the non-contractual liability of the European Union – Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 – Organic production and labelling of organic products – Article 33(3) – Concept of ‘appropriate supervision’ – Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 – Arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries – Private control body for the purpose of equivalence – Attribution of that body’s conduct to the European Commission.#Case C-586/20 P.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25790Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#P. Krücken Organic GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Action for damages – Conditions governing the non-contractual liability of the European Union – Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 – Organic production and labelling of organic products – Article 33(3) – Concept of ‘appropriate supervision’ – Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 – Arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries – Private control body for the purpose of equivalence – Attribution of that body’s conduct to the European Commission.#Case C-586/20 P.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25791Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 21 décembre 2021.#Vítkovice Steel a.s. contre Ministerstvo životního prostředí.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Système d’échange de quotas d’émission de gaz à effet de serre – Directive 2003/87/CE – Article 11, paragraphe 3 – Décision 2011/278/UE – Article 3, sous b), et article 10, paragraphe 2, sous a) – Sous-installation avec référentiel de produit – Décision 2013/448/UE – Validité – Installation utilisant un convertisseur à oxygène – Fonte liquide – Intrant provenant d’une installation tierce – Refus d’allocation des quotas d’émission – Recevabilité – Défaut d’introduction d’un recours en annulation par la requérante au principal.#Affaire C-524/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25792Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Vítkovice Steel a.s. v Ministerstvo životního prostředí.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Městský soud v Praze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – Directive 2003/87/EC – Article 11(3) – Decision 2011/278/EU – Article 3(b) and Article 10(2)(a) – Product benchmark sub-installation – Decision 2013/448/EU – Validity – Installation using a basic oxygen furnace – Hot metal – Input from a third-party installation – Refusal to allocate emission allowances – Admissibility – Failure by the applicant in the main proceedings to bring an action for annulment.#Case C-524/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25793Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Randstad Italia SpA v Umana SpA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Obligation of Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Public procurement – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 1(1) and (3) – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Judgment of a Member State’s highest administrative court declaring inadmissible, in breach of the case-law of the Court of Justice, an action brought by a tenderer excluded from a public procurement procedure – No remedy against that judgment before the highest court in that Member State’s judicial order – Principles of effectiveness and equivalence.#Case C-497/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25794Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Randstad Italia SpA v Umana SpA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Obligation of Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Public procurement – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 1(1) and (3) – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Judgment of a Member State’s highest administrative court declaring inadmissible, in breach of the case-law of the Court of Justice, an action brought by a tenderer excluded from a public procurement procedure – No remedy against that judgment before the highest court in that Member State’s judicial order – Principles of effectiveness and equivalence.#Case C-497/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25795Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 21 décembre 2021.#A.K. contre Skarb Państwa.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Assurance obligatoire de la responsabilité civile résultant de la circulation des véhicules automoteurs – Deuxième directive 84/5/CEE – Article 1er, paragraphe 2 – Directive 2005/14/CE – Directive 2009/103/CE – Article 9, paragraphe 1 – Obligation d’augmenter les montants minimaux couverts par l’assurance obligatoire – Période transitoire – Règle nouvelle s’appliquant immédiatement aux effets futurs d’une situation née sous l’empire de la règle ancienne – Situation acquise antérieurement à l’entrée en vigueur d’une règle de l’Union de droit matériel – Réglementation nationale excluant les contrats d’assurance conclus avant le 11 décembre 2009 de l’obligation d’augmenter les montants minimaux couverts par l’assurance obligatoire.#Affaire C-428/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25796Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#A.K. v Skarb Państwa.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Second Directive 84/5/EEC – Article 1(2) – Directive 2005/14/EC – Directive 2009/103/EC – Article 9(1) – Obligation to increase the minimum amounts covered by compulsory insurance – Transitional period – New rule applicable immediately to the future effects of a situation which arose under the old rule – Situation arising prior to the entry into force of a substantive rule of EU law – National rules excluding insurance contracts concluded before 11 December 2009 from the obligation to increase the minimum amounts covered by compulsory insurance.#Case C-428/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25797Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 21 décembre 2021.#EP et GM contre Corendon Airlines Turistik Hava Tasimacilik A.S.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transports aériens – Règlement (CE) no 261/2004 – Règles communes en matière d’indemnisation et d’assistance des passagers en cas d’annulation ou de retard important d’un vol – Article 2, sous l) – Article 5, paragraphe 1 – Changement de l’heure de départ d’un vol – Départ reporté d’environ trois heures – Information aux passagers neuf jours avant le départ – Notions d’“annulation” et de “retard”.#Affaire C-395/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25798Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#EP and GM v Corendon Airlines Turistik Hava Tasimacilik A.S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights – Article 2(l) – Article 5(1) – Change in the departure time of a flight – Departure postponed by approximately three hours – Passengers notified nine days before departure – Concepts of ‘cancellation’ and ‘delay’.#Case C-395/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25799Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#XY v Finanzamt V.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Articles 63 and 65 TFEU – National legislation on inheritance tax – Immovable property situated on national territory – Limited tax liability – Different treatment of residents and non-residents – Right to an allowance on the taxable value – Proportionate reduction in the case of limited tax liability – Liabilities arising from reserved portions – No deduction in the case of limited tax liability.#Case C-394/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.
25800Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#XY v Finanzamt V.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Articles 63 and 65 TFEU – National legislation on inheritance tax – Immovable property situated on national territory – Limited tax liability – Different treatment of residents and non-residents – Right to an allowance on the taxable value – Proportionate reduction in the case of limited tax liability – Liabilities arising from reserved portions – No deduction in the case of limited tax liability.#Case C-394/20.cjeu_case · 21 декабря 2021 г.