Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
25304

Case T-202/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — Vita Zahnfabrik v EUIPO — VIPI Produtos Odontológicos (VITABLOCS TriLuxe forte) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark VITABLOCS TriLuxe forte — Earlier EU word mark TRILUX — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
25309

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#LU v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Dignity at Work Policy – Psychological harassment – Investigation procedure – Action for annulment – Final report of the investigation panel – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Decision rejecting the complaint – Act adversely affecting an official – Admissibility – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Liability.#Case T-536/20.

cjeu_case ·
25310

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#LU v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Dignity at Work Policy – Psychological harassment – Investigation procedure – Action for annulment – Final report of the investigation panel – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Decision rejecting the complaint – Act adversely affecting an official – Admissibility – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Liability.#Case T-536/20.

cjeu_case ·
25312

Case T-536/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — LU v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Dignity at Work Policy — Psychological harassment — Investigation procedure — Action for annulment — Final report of the investigation panel — Preparatory act — Inadmissibility — Decision rejecting the complaint — Act adversely affecting an official — Admissibility — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Liability)

cjeu_case ·
25315

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Pilatus Bank plc and Pilatus Holding ltd. v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Indictment of the main shareholder in a third country – Criterion of good repute – Perception of good repute by the market – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Rights of the defence.#Case T-27/19.

cjeu_case ·
25316

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Pilatus Bank plc and Pilatus Holding ltd. v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Indictment of the main shareholder in a third country – Criterion of good repute – Perception of good repute by the market – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Rights of the defence.#Case T-27/19.

cjeu_case ·
25318

Case T-27/19: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — Pilatus Bank and Pilatus Holding v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB — Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation — Indictment of the main shareholder in a third country — Criterion of good repute — Perception of good repute by the market — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Rights of the defence)

cjeu_case ·
25319

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of a dominant position – Gas markets of central and eastern Europe – Decision to make binding the individual commitments proposed by an undertaking – Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Whether the commitments are adequate in the light of the competition concerns initially identified in the statement of objections – Commission decision not to require commitments in relation to some of the initial concerns – Principle of sound administration – Transparency – Obligation to state reasons – Energy-policy objectives of the European Union – Principle of energy solidarity – Misuse of powers.#Case T-616/18.

cjeu_case ·
25320

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of a dominant position – Gas markets of central and eastern Europe – Decision to make binding the individual commitments proposed by an undertaking – Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Whether the commitments are adequate in the light of the competition concerns initially identified in the statement of objections – Commission decision not to require commitments in relation to some of the initial concerns – Principle of sound administration – Transparency – Obligation to state reasons – Energy-policy objectives of the European Union – Principle of energy solidarity – Misuse of powers.#Case T-616/18.

cjeu_case ·