Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
25222

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Heitec AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark HEITEC – No account taken of evidence submitted before the Cancellation Division and before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No genuine use of the trade mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rule 40(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625).#Case T-520/19.

cjeu_case ·
25223

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Heitec AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark HEITEC – No account taken of evidence submitted before the Cancellation Division and before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No genuine use of the trade mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rule 40(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625).#Case T-520/19.

cjeu_case ·
25226

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#GEA Group AG v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European markets in tin stabilisers and in ESBO/esters heat stabilisers – Decision establishing an infringement of Article 81 EC – Decision amending the initial decision annulled – Decision rejecting a request for repayment of the fine – Action for annulment – Actionable measure – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 266(1) TFEU.#Case T-195/19.

cjeu_case ·
25227

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#GEA Group AG v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European markets in tin stabilisers and in ESBO/esters heat stabilisers – Decision establishing an infringement of Article 81 EC – Decision amending the initial decision annulled – Decision rejecting a request for repayment of the fine – Action for annulment – Actionable measure – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 266(1) TFEU.#Case T-195/19.

cjeu_case ·
25228

Case T-791/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 February 2022 — Sped-Pro v Commission (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Rail freight transport services market — Decision rejecting a complaint — Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 — Reasonable time — EU interest in pursuing examination of a complaint — Determination of the authority best placed to examine a complaint — Criteria — Manifest error of assessment — Systemic or generalised deficiencies concerning respect for the rule of law — Risk of infringement of a complainant’s rights if a complaint is rejected — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
25231

Case T-520/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 February 2022 — Heitec v EUIPO — Hetec Datensysteme (HEITEC) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark HEITEC — No account taken of evidence submitted before the Cancellation Division and before the Board of Appeal — Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No genuine use of the trade mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Rule 40(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625))

cjeu_case ·
25233

Case T-195/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 February 2022 — GEA Group v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European markets in tin stabilisers and in ESBO/esters heat stabilisers — Decision establishing an infringement of Article 81 EC — Decision amending the initial decision annulled — Decision rejecting a request for repayment of the fine — Action for annulment — Actionable measure — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Article 266(1) TFEU)

cjeu_case ·
25234

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Taminco BVBA and Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance thiram – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Rights of the defence – Procedural irregularity – Manifest error of assessment – Competence of EFSA – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Equal treatment.#Case T-740/18.

cjeu_case ·
25235

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Taminco BVBA and Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance thiram – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Rights of the defence – Procedural irregularity – Manifest error of assessment – Competence of EFSA – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Equal treatment.#Case T-740/18.

cjeu_case ·
25237

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 February 2022 (Extracts).#QI and Others v European Commission and European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Restructuring of Greek public debt – Bond exchange agreement for the sole benefit of the Eurosystem central banks – Private sector involvement – Collective action clauses – Private creditors – Official sector creditors – Attributability – Sufficiently serious infringement of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Article 63(1) TFEU – Articles 120 to 127 and Article 352(1) TFEU – Right to property – Equal treatment.#Case T-868/16.

cjeu_case ·
25238

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 February 2022 (Extracts).#QI and Others v European Commission and European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Restructuring of Greek public debt – Bond exchange agreement for the sole benefit of the Eurosystem central banks – Private sector involvement – Collective action clauses – Private creditors – Official sector creditors – Attributability – Sufficiently serious infringement of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Article 63(1) TFEU – Articles 120 to 127 and Article 352(1) TFEU – Right to property – Equal treatment.#Case T-868/16.

cjeu_case ·
25239

Case T-868/16: Judgment of the General Court of 9 February 2022 — QI and Others v Commission and ECB (Non-contractual liability — Economic and monetary policy — Restructuring of Greek public debt — Bond exchange agreement for the sole benefit of the Eurosystem central banks — Private sector involvement — Collective action clauses — Private creditors — Official sector creditors — Attributability — Sufficiently serious infringement of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Article 63(1) TFEU — Articles 120 to 127 and Article 352(1) TFEU — Right to property — Equal treatment)

cjeu_case ·