Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
25207

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#'Konservinvest' OOD v 'Bulkons Parvomay' OOD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs – Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – Designations of Origin and Geographical indications – Article 9 – Transitional national protection – Geographical indication designating an agricultural product, registered under the legislation of a Member State and protected at national level.#Case C-35/21.

cjeu_case ·
25208

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#'Konservinvest' OOD v 'Bulkons Parvomay' OOD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgarie).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs – Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – Designations of Origin and Geographical indications – Article 9 – Transitional national protection – Geographical indication designating an agricultural product, registered under the legislation of a Member State and protected at national level.#Case C-35/21.

cjeu_case ·
25209

Case C-35/21: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘Konservinvest’ OOD v ‘Bulkons Parvomay’ OOD (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs — Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 — Designations of Origin and Geographical indications — Article 9 — Transitional national protection — Geographical indication designating an agricultural product, registered under the legislation of a Member State and protected at national level)

cjeu_case ·
25210

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Calzaturificio Emmegiemme Shoes Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark MAIMAI MADE IN ITALY – Earlier EU word mark YAMAMAY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Admissibility of new evidence – Alteration of the distinctive character.#Case T-589/20.

cjeu_case ·
25211

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Calzaturificio Emmegiemme Shoes Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark MAIMAI MADE IN ITALY – Earlier EU word mark YAMAMAY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Admissibility of new evidence – Alteration of the distinctive character.#Case T-589/20.

cjeu_case ·
25212

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Ivo Van Walle v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – ECDC staff members – Appraisal report for 2018 – Freedom of expression – Obligation to state reasons – Case requiring a specific statement of reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Right to be heard.#Case T-33/20.

cjeu_case ·
25213

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Ivo Van Walle v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – ECDC staff members – Appraisal report for 2018 – Freedom of expression – Obligation to state reasons – Case requiring a specific statement of reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Right to be heard.#Case T-33/20.

cjeu_case ·
25214

Case T-589/20: Judgment of the General Court of 9 February 2022 — Calzaturificio Emmegiemme Shoes v EUIPO — Inticom (MAIMAI MADE IN ITALY) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark MAIMAI MADE IN ITALY — Earlier EU word mark YAMAMAY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Admissibility of new evidence — Alteration of the distinctive character)

cjeu_case ·
25216

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 February 2022.#Sped-Pro S.A. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Market for rail freight transport services – Decision rejecting a complaint – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Reasonable time – EU interest in pursuing the examination of a complaint – Determination of the authority that is best placed to examine a complaint – Criteria – Manifest error of assessment – Systemic or generalised deficiencies as regards respect for the rule of law – Risk of a breach of a complainant’s rights where a complaint is rejected – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-791/19.

cjeu_case ·
25217

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 February 2022.#Sped-Pro S.A. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Market for rail freight transport services – Decision rejecting a complaint – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Reasonable time – EU interest in pursuing the examination of a complaint – Determination of the authority that is best placed to examine a complaint – Criteria – Manifest error of assessment – Systemic or generalised deficiencies as regards respect for the rule of law – Risk of a breach of a complainant’s rights where a complaint is rejected – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-791/19.

cjeu_case ·