25161Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 11 February 2022.#Svenska Metallkompaniet AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Article 170a(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – No request that the appeal be allowed to proceed – Appeal inadmissible.#Case C-610/21 P.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2022 г.
25162Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2022.#OP v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Open Competition EPSO/AST/147/19 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment.#Case T-736/20.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2022 г.
25163Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2022.#OP v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Open Competition EPSO/AST/147/19 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment.#Case T-736/20.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2022 г.
25164Case T-736/20: Order of the General Court of 11 February 2022 — OP v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Open Competition EPSO/AST/147/19 — Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition — Obligation to state reasons — Equal treatment)cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2022 г.
25165Case C-101/22 P: Appeal brought on 10 February 2022 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 1 December 2021 in Case T-546/20, Sopra Steria Benelux and Unisys Belgium v Commissioncjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.
25166Case C-97/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Essen (Germany) lodged on 10 February 2022 — DC v HJcjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.
25167Case C-90/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 10 February 2022 — ‘Gjensidige’ ADBcjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.
25168Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#TO v European Environment Agency.#Civil service – Compliance with a judgment of the General Court – Decision which was not contested in time – Res judicata – Conditional undertaking given by the AECC in the context of an out-of-court settlement – Settlement offer not accepted by the applicant – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-434/21.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.
25169Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#TO v European Environment Agency.#Civil service – Compliance with a judgment of the General Court – Decision which was not contested in time – Res judicata – Conditional undertaking given by the AECC in the context of an out-of-court settlement – Settlement offer not accepted by the applicant – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-434/21.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.
25170Case T-434/21: Order of the General Court of 10 February 2022 — TO v EEA (Civil service — Compliance with a judgment of the General Court — Decision which was not contested in time — Res judicata — Conditional undertaking given by the AECC in the context of a favourable out-of-court settlement — Settlement offer not accepted by the applicant — No act adversely affecting the applicant — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.
25171Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance v Les Anges d’Eux SARL and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 392 – Margin taxation scheme – Scope – Supply of buildings and building land purchased for the purpose of resale – Taxable person for whom the VAT on the purchase of buildings was not deductible – Resale subject to VAT – Concept of ‘building land’.#Case C-191/21.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.
25172Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance v Les Anges d’Eux SARL and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Lyon.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 392 – Margin taxation scheme – Scope – Supply of buildings and building land purchased for the purpose of resale – Taxable person for whom the VAT on the purchase of buildings was not deductible – Resale subject to VAT – Concept of ‘building land’.#Case C-191/21.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.
25173Case C-191/21: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Lyon — France) — Ministre de l’Economie, des Finances et de la Relance v Les Anges d’Eux SARL, Echo 5 SARL, Cletimmo SAS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 392 — Margin taxation scheme — Scope — Supply of buildings and building land purchased for the purpose of resale — Taxable person for whom the VAT on the purchase of buildings was not deductible — Resale subject to VAT — Concept of ‘building land’)cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.
25174Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#UE v ShareWood Switzerland AG and VF.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Law applicable to contractual obligations – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) – Consumer contracts – Choice of applicable law – Article 6(4)(c) – Exclusion of contracts relating to a right in rem in immovable property or to a tenancy of immovable property – Contract of sale, including a lease agreement and a service agreement, relating to trees planted for the sole purpose of being harvested for profit.#Case C-595/20.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.
25175Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#UE v ShareWood Switzerland AG and VF.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Law applicable to contractual obligations – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) – Consumer contracts – Choice of applicable law – Article 6(4)(c) – Exclusion of contracts relating to a right in rem in immovable property or to a tenancy of immovable property – Contract of sale, including a lease agreement and a service agreement, relating to trees planted for the sole purpose of being harvested for profit.#Case C-595/20.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.
25176Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 10 février 2022.#PF et MF contre Minister for Agriculture Food and the Marine et Sea Fisheries Protection Authority (SFPA).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique commune de la pêche – Règlement (CE) no 1224/2009 – Régime de contrôle – Article 33, paragraphe 2, sous a), et article 34 – Enregistrements relatifs aux captures et à l’effort de pêche – Transmission à la Commission européenne des informations relatives aux quantités de langoustines capturées – Possibilité d’utiliser des données autres que celles figurant dans le journal de pêche – Méthode raisonnable et scientifiquement valable pour traiter et vérifier les données – Fermeture de pêcheries.#Affaire C-564/20.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.
25177Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#PF and MF v Minister for Agriculture Food and the Marine and Sea Fisheries Protection Authority (SFPA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 – Control system – Article 33(2)(a) and Article 34 – Recording of catches and fishing effort – Transmission to the European Commission of information concerning the quantities of nephrops caught – Possibility to use data other than those contained in the fishing logbook – Reasonable and scientifically valid method to process and verify data – Closure of fisheries.#Case C-564/20.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.
25178Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#OE v VY.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Validity – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction to hear and determine an application for divorce – Article 18 TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Fifth and sixth indents of Article 3(1)(a) – Difference between the length of the residence period required for the purposes of determining which court has jurisdiction – Distinction between a resident who is a national of the Member State of the court before which the application is brought and a resident who is not a national of that Member State – No discrimination on grounds of nationality.#Case C-522/20.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.
25179Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#OE v VY.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Validity – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction to hear and determine an application for divorce – Article 18 TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Fifth and sixth indents of Article 3(1)(a) – Difference between the length of the residence period required for the purposes of determining which court has jurisdiction – Distinction between a resident who is a national of the Member State of the court before which the application is brought and a resident who is not a national of that Member State – No discrimination on grounds of nationality.#Case C-522/20.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.
25180Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#DIMCO Dimovasili M.I.K.E. v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 97/23/EC – Pressure equipment – CE marking – Placing on the market and putting into service – Restrictions aimed at ensuring the protection of persons – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – National legislation imposing restrictions on the method of installation of gas pipes.#Case C-499/20.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2022 г.