25021Case T-184/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik v EUIPO — Schuju (Хозяин) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Хозяин — Earlier national figurative mark хозяюшка — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25022Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#OJ v European Commission.#Civil Service – Officials – Recruitment – Competition EPSO/AD/380/19 – Decision to refuse to extend the test dates for a competition – Time limits set for passing a selection test in a test centre – Right to a fair procedure – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Equal treatment.#Case T-709/20.cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25023Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#OJ v European Commission.#Civil Service – Officials – Recruitment – Competition EPSO/AD/380/19 – Decision to refuse to extend the test dates for a competition – Time limits set for passing a selection test in a test centre – Right to a fair procedure – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Equal treatment.#Case T-709/20.cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25024Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#OA v European Economic and Social Committee.#Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Disciplinary procedure – Disciplinary penalty – Written warning – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-671/20.cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25025Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#OA v European Economic and Social Committee.#Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Disciplinary procedure – Disciplinary penalty – Written warning – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-671/20.cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25026Case T-695/20: Order of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — OG v EIBcjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25027Case T-709/20: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — OJ v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Recruitment — Competition EPSO/AD/380/19 — Decision to refuse to extend the test dates for a competition — Time limits set for passing a selection test in a test centre — Right to a fair procedure — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Equal treatment)cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25028Case T-671/20: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — OA v EESC (Civil service — Officials — Psychological harassment — Disciplinary procedure — Disciplinary penalty — Written warning — Rights of the defence — Error of assessment — Liability)cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25029Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Govern d'Andorra v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Andorra – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-806/19.cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25030Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Govern d'Andorra v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Andorra – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-806/19.cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25031Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Chemours Netherlands BV v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list of substances for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)propionic acid, its salts and its acyl halides as a substance fulfilling the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list – Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-636/19.cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25032Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Chemours Netherlands BV v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list of substances for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)propionic acid, its salts and its acyl halides as a substance fulfilling the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list – Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-636/19.cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25033Case T-806/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — Govern d’Andorra v EUIPO (Andorra) (European Union trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark Andorra — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25034Case T-636/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — Chemours Netherlands v ECHA (REACH — Substances of very high concern — Establishment of a candidate list of substances for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Decision identifying 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)propionic acid, its salts and its acyl halides as a substance fulfilling the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list — Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25035Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 February 2022.#ASL Aviation Holdings DAC and ASL Airlines (Ireland) Ltd v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Competition – Markets for international express small package delivery services in the EEA – Concentration – Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market – Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the Court – General reference to other documents – Pleas in law or complaints raised by a third party in another case – Evidence submitted in the reply – No justification for the delay – Inadmissibility – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-540/18.cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25036Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 February 2022.#ASL Aviation Holdings DAC and ASL Airlines (Ireland) Ltd v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Competition – Markets for international express small package delivery services in the EEA – Concentration – Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market – Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the Court – General reference to other documents – Pleas in law or complaints raised by a third party in another case – Evidence submitted in the reply – No justification for the delay – Inadmissibility – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-540/18.cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25037Case T-540/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — ASL Aviation Holdings and ASL Airlines (Ireland) v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Competition — Markets for international express small package delivery services in the EEA — Concentration — Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market — Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the Court — General reference to other documents — Pleas in law or complaints raised by a third party in another case — Evidence submitted in the reply — No justification for the delay — Inadmissibility — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25038Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 February 2022.#United Parcel Service, Inc. v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Competition – Markets for international express small package delivery services in the EEA – Concentration – Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market – Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the Court – Rights of the defence – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Causal link.#Case T-834/17.cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25039Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 February 2022.#United Parcel Service, Inc. v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Competition – Markets for international express small package delivery services in the EEA – Concentration – Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market – Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the Court – Rights of the defence – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Causal link.#Case T-834/17.cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.
25040Case T-834/17: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — United Parcel Service v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Competition — Markets for international express small package delivery services in the EEA — Concentration — Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market — Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the Court — Rights of the defence — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Causal link)cjeu_case · 23 февраля 2022 г.