24801Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#Proceedings brought by A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Scope – Conditions for obtaining authorisation to pursue the profession of doctor independently in the host Member State – Diploma issued in the home Member State – Right to pursue the profession of doctor limited to a period of three years – Supervision of a licensed doctor and concomitant completion of three years of special training in general medical practice – Articles 45 and 49 TFEU.#Case C-634/20.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24802Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others v UK and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Coordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in respect of activities of doctors – Directives 75/363/EEC and 82/76/EEC – Specialist medical training – Appropriate remuneration – Application of Directive 82/76/EEC to training begun before its entry into force and continuing after the date of expiry of the period prescribed for its transposition.#Case C-590/20.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24803Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others v UK and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Coordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in respect of activities of doctors – Directives 75/363/EEC and 82/76/EEC – Specialist medical training – Appropriate remuneration – Application of Directive 82/76/EEC to training begun before its entry into force and continuing after the date of expiry of the period prescribed for its transposition.#Case C-590/20.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24804Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#Acacia Srl v Bayerische Motoren Werke AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Community designs – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 82(5) – Action brought before the courts of the Member State in which an act of infringement has been committed or threatened – Claims supplementary to the action for infringement – Applicable law – Article 88(2) – Article 89(1)(d) – Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 – Law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) – Article 8(2) – Country in which the intellectual property right was infringed.#Case C-421/20.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24805Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#Acacia Srl v Bayerische Motoren Werke AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Community designs – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 82(5) – Action brought before the courts of the Member State in which an act of infringement has been committed or threatened – Claims supplementary to the action for infringement – Applicable law – Article 88(2) – Article 89(1)(d) – Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 – Law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) – Article 8(2) – Country in which the intellectual property right was infringed.#Case C-421/20.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24806Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#UN v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Pontevedra.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2008/115/EC – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 6(1) and Article 8(1) – National legislation providing for the imposition, in the event of illegal stay, of a fine together with an obligation to leave the territory – Possibility of regularising the stay within a prescribed period – Article 7(1) and (2) – Period for voluntary departure.#Case C-409/20.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24807Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#UN v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Pontevedra.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso Administrativo de Pontevedra.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2008/115/EC – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 6(1) and Article 8(1) – National legislation providing for the imposition, in the event of illegal stay, of a fine together with an obligation to leave the territory – Possibility of regularising the stay within a prescribed period – Article 7(1) and (2) – Period for voluntary departure.#Case C-409/20.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24808Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#NB and AB v Secretary of State for the Home Department.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection – Directive 2004/83/EU – Article 12 – Exclusion from being a refugee – Stateless person of Palestinian origin registered with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (for Palestine Refugees in the Near East) (UNRWA) – Conditions to be entitled ipso facto to the benefits of Directive 2004/83/EC – Cessation of UNRWA’s protection or assistance.#Case C-349/20.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24809Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#NB and AB v Secretary of State for the Home Department.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection – Directive 2004/83/EU – Article 12 – Exclusion from being a refugee – Stateless person of Palestinian origin registered with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (for Palestine Refugees in the Near East) (UNRWA) – Conditions to be entitled ipso facto to the benefits of Directive 2004/83/EC – Cessation of UNRWA’s protection or assistance.#Case C-349/20.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24810Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#WV v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Civil service – Request for assistance – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 90(1) and (2) – Date on which the request was made – Implied decision refusing the request – Complaint – Submission – Time period – Excusable error.#Case C-172/20 P.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24811Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#WV v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Civil service – Request for assistance – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 90(1) and (2) – Date on which the request was made – Implied decision refusing the request – Complaint – Submission – Time period – Excusable error.#Case C-172/20 P.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24812Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#WV v European External Action Service (EEAS).#Appeal – Civil Service – Request for assistance – Claim for damages – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 24, paragraphs 1 and 2 – Article 90(1) and (2) – Review of an administrative measure which has become final.#Case C-171/20 P.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24813Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#WV v European External Action Service (EEAS).#Appeal – Civil Service – Request for assistance – Claim for damages – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 24, paragraphs 1 and 2 – Article 90(1) and (2) – Review of an administrative measure which has become final.#Case C-171/20 P.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24814Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#WV v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 60, first paragraph – Unauthorised absence – Scope – Deduction from annual leave – Amounts withheld from remuneration – Official who has failed to fulfil his or her obligations under Articles 21 and 55 of the Staff Regulations.#Case C-162/20 P.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24815Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#WV v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 60, first paragraph – Unauthorised absence – Scope – Deduction from annual leave – Amounts withheld from remuneration – Official who has failed to fulfil his or her obligations under Articles 21 and 55 of the Staff Regulations.#Case C-162/20 P.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24816Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 3 March 2022.#ET v Ministerstvo životního prostředí.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein – Regulation (EC) No 338/97 – Article 8(3)(d) – Concept of ‘specimens of animal species that are born and bred in captivity’ – Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 – Article 1(3) – Concept of ‘breeding stock’ – Article 54(2) – Establishment of the breeding stock – Controlled ancestry.#Case C-659/20.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24817Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 3 March 2022.###cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24818Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 3 March 2022.#Criminal proceedings against HN.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 47 and 48 – European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Article 6 – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings – Article 8 – Right to be present at the trial – Return decision accompanied by an entry ban of five years – Conditions for holding a trial in the absence of the person concerned – Obligation to be present at the trial provided for under national law.#Case C-420/20.cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24819Case C-664/20 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 March 2022 — Single Resolution Board (SRB) v Portigon AG, European Commission (Appeal — Article 182 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Banking union — Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) — Single Resolution Fund (SRF) — Calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions — Authentication of a decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) — Obligation to state reasons — Confidential data)cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.
24820Case C-663/20 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 March 2022 — Single Resolution Board v Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG (Appeal — Article 182 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Banking union — Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) — Single Resolution Fund (SRF) — Calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions — Authentication of a decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) — Obligation to state reasons — Confidential data)cjeu_case · 3 марта 2022 г.