Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
24601

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2022.#NP v Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2008/104/EC – Temporary agency work – Article 1(1) – “Temporarily” assigned – Concept – Employment in a permanent job – Article 5(5) – Successive assignments – Article 10 – Sanctions – Article 11 – Derogation by the parties to a collective agreement from the maximum assignment period prescribed by the national legislature.#Case C-232/20.

cjeu_case ·
24602

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2022.#NP v Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz Werk Berlin.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2008/104/EC – Temporary agency work – Article 1(1) – “Temporarily” assigned – Concept – Employment in a permanent job – Article 5(5) – Successive assignments – Article 10 – Sanctions – Article 11 – Derogation by the parties to a collective agreement from the maximum assignment period prescribed by the national legislature.#Case C-232/20.

cjeu_case ·
24603

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 17 March 2022.#Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank and Y v X and Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security for migrant workers – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 11(3)(a) and (e) – Person residing in one Member State and employed in another Member State – Employment contract or contracts entered into with a single temporary employment agency – Temporary work assignments – Intervening periods – Determination of the legislation applicable during intervening periods between temporary work assignments – Termination of the employment relationship.#Case C-713/20.

cjeu_case ·
24604

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 17 March 2022.#E.K. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/109/EC – Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents – Scope – Third-country national with a right of residence under Article 20 TFEU – Article 3(2)(e) – Residence solely on temporary grounds – Autonomous concept of EU law.#Case C-624/20.

cjeu_case ·
24605

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 17 March 2022.#XP and AR v Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide and St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#References for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7(1) – Right to paid annual leave – Total invalidity or incapacity for work due to illness occurring during a leave year – National legislation providing for the loss of entitlement to paid annual leave on expiry of a certain period – Employer’s obligation to enable the worker to exercise his or her right to paid annual leave.#Joined Cases C-518/20 and C-727/20.

cjeu_case ·
24606

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 17 March 2022.#European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – Quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs – Article 13 – Use of the protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Feta’ to designate cheese produced in Denmark and intended for export to third countries – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-159/20.

cjeu_case ·
24607

Case C-232/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg — Germany) — NP v Daimler AG, Mercedez-Benz Werk Berlin (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2008/104/EC — Temporary agency work — Article 1(1) — ‘Temporarily’ assigned — Concept — Employment in a permanent job — Article 5(5) — Successive assignments — Article 10 — Sanctions — Article 11 — Derogation by the parties to a collective agreement from the maximum assignment period prescribed by the national legislature)

cjeu_case ·
24608

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2022.#AllianzGI-Fonds AEVN v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Taxation of dividends paid to undertakings for collective investment (UCIs) – Resident and non-resident UCIs – Difference in treatment – Withholding tax imposed solely on dividends paid to non-resident UCIs – Comparability of the situations – Assessment – Account to be taken of the tax regime applicable to shareholders or unitholders in UCIs and of whether resident undertakings are subject to other taxes – None.#Case C-545/19.

cjeu_case ·
24609

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2022.#AllianzGI-Fonds AEVN v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Taxation of dividends paid to undertakings for collective investment (UCIs) – Resident and non-resident UCIs – Difference in treatment – Withholding tax imposed solely on dividends paid to non-resident UCIs – Comparability of the situations – Assessment – Account to be taken of the tax regime applicable to shareholders or unitholders in UCIs and of whether resident undertakings are subject to other taxes – None.#Case C-545/19.

cjeu_case ·
24610

Case C-545/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2022 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — AllianzGI-Fonds AEVN v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 63 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Taxation of dividends paid to undertakings for collective investment (UCIs) — Resident and non-resident UCIs — Difference in treatment — Withholding tax imposed solely on dividends paid to non-resident UCIs — Comparability of the situations — Assessment — Account to be taken of the tax regime applicable to shareholders or unitholders in UCIs and of whether resident undertakings are subject to other taxes — None)

cjeu_case ·
24614

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 March 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark APIAL – Earlier EU word mark APIRETAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-315/21.

cjeu_case ·
24615

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 March 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark APIAL – Earlier EU word mark APIRETAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-315/21.

cjeu_case ·
24618

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 March 2022.#Nowhere Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark APE TEES – Earlier national non-registered figurative trade marks representing an ape – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Rules governing common-law actions for passing off – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and Euratom.#Case T-281/21.

cjeu_case ·
24619

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 March 2022.#Nowhere Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark APE TEES – Earlier national non-registered figurative trade marks representing an ape – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Rules governing common-law actions for passing off – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and Euratom.#Case T-281/21.

cjeu_case ·
24620

Case T-315/21: Judgment of the General Court of 16 March 2022 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Nordesta (APIAL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark APIAL — Earlier EU word mark APIRETAL — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court)

cjeu_case ·