24521Case C-656/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022 — Hermann Albers eK v European Commission, Federal Republic of Germany, Land Niedersachsen (Germany) (Appeal — State aid — Concept of ‘aid’ — Public transport of passengers — Offsetting of costs involved in the performance of public service obligations — Transfer of financial resources between public authorities — Obligation for municipal authorities that organise transport to guarantee reduced tariffs for students and apprentices — Lack of an advantage granted by the State to an undertaking — Obligation to notify)cjeu_case · 24 марта 2022 г.
24522Case C-533/20: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Somogy Megyei Kormányhivatal v Upfield Hungary Kft. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 — Provision of food information to consumers — Labelling — Mandatory particulars — List of ingredients — Specific name of those ingredients — Addition of a vitamin to a food — Obligation to indicate the specific name of that vitamin — No obligation to indicate the vitamin formulation used)cjeu_case · 24 марта 2022 г.
24523Case C-433/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien — Austria) — Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft mbH v Strato AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society — Directive 2001/29/EC — Article 2 — Reproduction — Article 5(2)(b) — Private copying exception — Concept of ‘any medium’ — Servers owned by third parties made available to natural persons for private use — Fair compensation — National legislation that does not make the providers of cloud computing services subject to the private copying levy)cjeu_case · 24 марта 2022 г.
24524Case C-245/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Midden-Nederland — Netherlands) — X, Z v Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Competence of the supervisory authority — Article 55(3) — Processing operations of courts acting in their judicial capacity — Concept — Making available to a journalist of documents arising from court proceedings containing personal data)cjeu_case · 24 марта 2022 г.
24525Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#PJ and PC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Principles of EU law – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of the parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union – Lawyer representing the applicant as a third party – Requirement of independence – Lawyer working as an associate in a law firm – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Joined Cases C-529/18 P and C-531/18 P.cjeu_case · 24 марта 2022 г.
24526Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#PJ and PC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Principles of EU law – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of the parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union – Lawyer representing the applicant as a third party – Requirement of independence – Lawyer working as an associate in a law firm – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Joined Cases C-529/18 P and C-531/18 P.cjeu_case · 24 марта 2022 г.
24527Joined Cases C-529/18 P and C-531/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 March 2022 — PJ v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Erdmann & Rossi GmbH (C-529/18 P), PC v PJ, European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Erdmann & Rossi GmbH (C-531/18 P) (Appeal — Principles of EU law — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Representation of parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union — Lawyer representing the applicant as a third party — Requirement of independence — Lawyer working as an associate in a law firm — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)cjeu_case · 24 марта 2022 г.
24528Case T-159/22: Action brought on 23 March 2022 — Sanetview v EUIPO — 2boca2catering (Las Cebras)cjeu_case · 23 марта 2022 г.
24529Case T-156/22: Action brought on 23 March 2022 — Hyundai Heavy Industries Holdings v Commissioncjeu_case · 23 марта 2022 г.
24530Case C-216/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Sigmaringen (Germany) lodged on 23 March 2022 — A.A. v Bundesrepublik Deutschlandcjeu_case · 23 марта 2022 г.
24531Case C-215/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 23 March 2022 — Research Consorzio Stabile Scarl, acting on its own account and as agent of the association of undertakings to be constituted (Research-Cisa) and Others v Invitalia — Agenzia Nazionale per l’Attrazione degli Investimenti e lo Sviluppo di Impresa and Otherscjeu_case · 23 марта 2022 г.
24532Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark AION – Earlier national figurative mark ION and earlier word mark IONFARMA – Relative ground for refusal – No similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-465/21.cjeu_case · 23 марта 2022 г.
24533Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark AION – Earlier national figurative mark ION and earlier word mark IONFARMA – Relative ground for refusal – No similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-465/21.cjeu_case · 23 марта 2022 г.
24534Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#Anna Hrebenyuk v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a stand-up collar – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-252/21.cjeu_case · 23 марта 2022 г.
24535Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#Anna Hrebenyuk v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a stand-up collar – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-252/21.cjeu_case · 23 марта 2022 г.
24536Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#Vetpharma Animal Health, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark DELTATIC – Earlier EU word mark DELTA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-146/21.cjeu_case · 23 марта 2022 г.
24537Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#Vetpharma Animal Health, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark DELTATIC – Earlier EU word mark DELTA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-146/21.cjeu_case · 23 марта 2022 г.
24538Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#Team Beverage AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Beverage Analytics – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-113/21.cjeu_case · 23 марта 2022 г.
24539Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#Team Beverage AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Beverage Analytics – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-113/21.cjeu_case · 23 марта 2022 г.
24540Case T-342/21: Order of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Bambu Sales v EUIPO (BAMBU) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 23 марта 2022 г.