24381Case T-35/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — SFD v EUIPO — Allmax Nutrition (ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION — Earlier EU word marks ALLMAX NUTRITION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24382Case T-30/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — L’Oréal v EUIPO — Debonair Trading Internacional (SO COUTURE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SO COUTURE — EU word mark SO …? — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24383Ordonnance du vice-président de la Cour du 30 mars 2022.#Giovanna Paola Girardi contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Référé – Représentation – Absence de capacité à agir en qualité de représentant devant l’Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO) – Urgence – Préjudice grave et irréparable – Non-lieu à statuer.#Affaire C-703/21 P(R).cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24384Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 30 March 2022.#Giovanna Paola Girardi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Interim measures – Representation – No capacity to act as a representative before the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) – Urgency – Serious and irreparable damage – No need to adjudicate.#Case C-703/21 P(R).cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24385Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Orbest, SA v CS and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights – Article 5(3) – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Aircraft’s technical failure caused by the collision of a catering vehicle owned by a third party with that aircraft while the latter was parked at the airport.#Case C-659/21.cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24386Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Orbest, SA v CS and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights – Article 5(3) – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Aircraft’s technical failure caused by the collision of a catering vehicle owned by a third party with that aircraft while the latter was parked at the airport.#Case C-659/21.cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24387Case C-685/21: Order of the President of the Court of 30 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — YV v Stadtverkehr Lindau (B) GmbHcjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24388Case C-659/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa — Portugal) — Orbest, SA v CS, QN, OP and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights — Article 5(3) — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Aircraft’s technical failure caused by the collision of a catering vehicle owned by a third party with that aircraft while the latter was parked at the airport)cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24389Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Perry Street Software, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark SCRUFFS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-720/20.cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24390Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Perry Street Software, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark SCRUFFS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-720/20.cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24391Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#KF v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Complaint of psychological harassment – Administrative investigation – Decision rejecting the complaint – Error of assessment – Principle of sound administration – Liability.#Case T-299/20.cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24392Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#KF v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Complaint of psychological harassment – Administrative investigation – Decision rejecting the complaint – Error of assessment – Principle of sound administration – Liability.#Case T-299/20.cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24393Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-292/20.cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24394Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-292/20.cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24395Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-291/20.cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24396Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-291/20.cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24397Case T-720/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Perry Street Software v EUIPO — Toolstream (SCRUFFS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark SCRUFFS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24398Case T-299/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — KF v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Complaint of psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Decision rejecting the complaint — Error of assessment — Principle of sound administration — Liability)cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24399Case T-292/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Yanukovych v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.
24400Case T-291/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Yanukovych v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)cjeu_case · 30 марта 2022 г.