Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
2424

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v Ferrari SpA and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-598/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
2425

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v Ferrari SpA and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-598/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
2428

Ordonnance du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 19 janvier 2026.#Pic Corp. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Enregistrement international désignant l’Union européenne – Marque figurative PIC – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale antérieure PIC – Cause de nullité relative – Usage sérieux de la marque antérieure – Article 64, paragraphe 2, du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Recevabilité de nouveaux éléments de preuve – Périodes pertinentes – Article 95, paragraphe 2, du règlement 2017/1001 – Article 27, paragraphe 4, du règlement délégué (UE) 2018/625 – Eléments de preuve présentés pour la première fois devant la chambre de recours – Pouvoir d’appréciation de la chambre de recours – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-571/24.

cjeu_case ·
2429

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 January 2026.#Pic Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark PIC – Earlier EU word mark PIC – Relative ground for invalidity – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of new evidence – Relevant periods – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-571/24.

cjeu_case ·
2430

Case T-571/24: Order of the General Court of 19 January 2026 – Pic v EUIPO – Updike eCom (PIC) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark PIC – Earlier EU word mark PIC – Relative ground for invalidity – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of new evidence – Relevant periods – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·