24241Case T-219/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Agora Invest v EUIPO — Transportes Maquinaria y Obras (TRAMOSA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark TRAMOSA — Earlier EU figurative mark TRAMO, SA TRANSPORTE MAQUINARIA Y OBRAS, S.A. — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 15(1)(a) and Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1)(a) and Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character)cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24242Case T-208/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Dorit-DFT v EUIPO — Erwin Suter (DORIT) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark DORIT — Earlier national company names — Relative ground for refusal — No use in trade of a sign of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) and Article 52(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24243Case T-118/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Cilem Records International v EUIPO — KVZ Music (HALIX RECORDS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark HALIX RECORDS — Earlier national word and figurative marks HALIX RECORDS — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Rule 19(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(1) and (2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625))cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24244Case T-57/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Hungary v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Obligation to increase on-the-spot checks — Article 35 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 — Legal value of the working documents of the Commission — Calculation of the increase in the rate of on-the-spot checks)cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24245Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Planistat Europe and Hervé-Patrick Charlot v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – ‘Eurostat’ case – External investigation by OLAF – Forwarding to the national judicial authorities of information concerning matters liable to result in criminal proceedings before the conclusion of the investigation – Filing of a complaint by the Commission before the conclusion of the investigation – National criminal proceedings – Ruling that there is no need to adjudicate which has become final – No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-735/20.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24246Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Planistat Europe and Hervé-Patrick Charlot v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – ‘Eurostat’ case – External investigation by OLAF – Forwarding to the national judicial authorities of information concerning matters liable to result in criminal proceedings before the conclusion of the investigation – Filing of a complaint by the Commission before the conclusion of the investigation – National criminal proceedings – Ruling that there is no need to adjudicate which has become final – No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-735/20.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24247Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#MF v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Post occupied requiring security clearance – Clearance refused by the national security authority – Termination of the contract – No request for a hearing – Right to be heard within the meaning of Article 11(5)(b) of Decision 2015/444.#Case T-568/20.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24248Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#MF v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Post occupied requiring security clearance – Clearance refused by the national security authority – Termination of the contract – No request for a hearing – Right to be heard within the meaning of Article 11(5)(b) of Decision 2015/444.#Case T-568/20.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24249Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark QUEST 9 – Earlier EU word mark QUEX – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Articles 95 and 97 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-516/20.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24250Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark QUEST 9 – Earlier EU word mark QUEX – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Articles 95 and 97 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-516/20.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24251Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#KU v European External Action Service.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – EEAS staff – Psychological harassment – Administrative investigation – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Reasonable time – Liability.#Case T-425/20.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24252Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#KU v European External Action Service.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – EEAS staff – Psychological harassment – Administrative investigation – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Reasonable time – Liability.#Case T-425/20.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24253Case T-735/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Planistat Europe and Charlot v Commission (Non-contractual liability — ‘Eurostat’ case — External investigation by OLAF — Forwarding to the national judicial authorities of information concerning matters liable to result in criminal proceedings before the conclusion of the investigation — Filing of a complaint by the Commission before the conclusion of the investigation — National criminal proceedings — Ruling that there is no need to adjudicate which has become final — No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24254Case T-568/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — MF v eu-LISA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Post occupied requiring security clearance — Clearance refused by the national security authority — Termination of the contract — No request for a hearing — Right to be heard within the meaning of Article 11(5)(b) of Decision 2015/444)cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24255Case T-516/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Mandelay v EUIPO — Qx World (QUEST 9) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark QUEST 9 — Earlier EU word mark QUEX — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Articles 95 and 97 of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24256Case T-425/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — KU v EEAS (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — EEAS staff — Psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Rejection of the request — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Reasonable time — Liability)cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24257Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#FC v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Pre-disciplinary proceedings – Suspension, withholding of remuneration and prohibition on access to EUAA’s premises and facilities – OLAF Report – Principle of sound administration – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Liability – Close link with the claim for annulment.#Case T-634/19.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24258Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#FC v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Pre-disciplinary proceedings – Suspension, withholding of remuneration and prohibition on access to EUAA’s premises and facilities – OLAF Report – Principle of sound administration – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Liability – Close link with the claim for annulment.#Case T-634/19.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24259Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 April 2022.#Mead Johnson Nutrition (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Government of Gibraltar concerning corporation tax – Tax exemption for interest income and royalties – Advance tax rulings benefiting multinationals – Commission decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Selective advantage – Right to submit comments.#Case T-508/19.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.
24260Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 April 2022.#Mead Johnson Nutrition (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Government of Gibraltar concerning corporation tax – Tax exemption for interest income and royalties – Advance tax rulings benefiting multinationals – Commission decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Selective advantage – Right to submit comments.#Case T-508/19.cjeu_case · 6 апреля 2022 г.