24181Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#I GmbH v Finanzamt H.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 132(1)(b) – Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest – Exemption for hospital and medical care – Private hospital – Duly recognised establishment – Comparable social conditions.#Case C-228/20.cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24182Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#SC Avio Lucos SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură – Centrul judeţean Dolj and Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură (APIA) – Aparat Central.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes – Common rules – Single area payment scheme – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 4(1)(a) and (c) and Article 4(2)(b) – National legislation making direct support conditional on the farmer keeping his own animals – Article 9(1) – Concept of ‘active farmer’ – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 60 – Circumvention clause – Concept of ‘artificially created conditions’.#Case C-176/20.cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24183Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#SC Avio Lucos SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură – Centrul judeţean Dolj and Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură (APIA) – Aparat Central.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes – Common rules – Single area payment scheme – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 4(1)(a) and (c) and Article 4(2)(b) – National legislation making direct support conditional on the farmer keeping his own animals – Article 9(1) – Concept of ‘active farmer’ – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 60 – Circumvention clause – Concept of ‘artificially created conditions’.#Case C-176/20.cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24184Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#SC Avio Lucos SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură – Centrul judeţean Dolj and Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură (APIA) – Aparat Central.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes – Common rules – Single area payment scheme – Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘agricultural activity’ – Article 35 – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – National legislation requiring the production of a legal document establishing the right to use the agricultural parcel made available to the farmer under a concession contract and making the validity of such a contract conditional on the future concessionaire having the status of breeder or owner of animals – Concessionaire of an area of pastureland who has concluded a cooperation contract with animal breeders – Res judicata.#Case C-116/20.cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24185Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#SC Avio Lucos SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură – Centrul judeţean Dolj and Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură (APIA) – Aparat Central.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes – Common rules – Single area payment scheme – Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘agricultural activity’ – Article 35 – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – National legislation requiring the production of a legal document establishing the right to use the agricultural parcel made available to the farmer under a concession contract and making the validity of such a contract conditional on the future concessionaire having the status of breeder or owner of animals – Concessionaire of an area of pastureland who has concluded a cooperation contract with animal breeders – Res judicata.#Case C-116/20.cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24186Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 7 April 2022.#DB Station & Service AG v ODEG Ostdeutsche Eisenbahn GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Directive 2001/14/EC – Access to railway infrastructure – Article 30 – Railway regulatory body – Review of infrastructure charges – National courts – Review of charges in the light of competition law – Division of competence between the regulatory authority and the national courts.#Case C-721/20.cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24187Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 7 April 2022.#B. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w W.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 41 – Intra-Community acquisition of goods – Place – Chain of successive transactions – Incorrect classification of some of the transactions – Principles of proportionality and fiscal neutrality.#Case C-696/20.cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24188Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 7 April 2022.#Colin Brown v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 4(1)(a) and (b) – EU official who is a national of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and who during the 10 years before his entry into service habitually resided within the territory of the State in which he is employed – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Acquisition by that EU official of the nationality of the State in which he is employed – Withdrawal of the entitlement to receive an expatriation allowance – Action for annulment.#Case C-675/20 P.cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24189Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 7 April 2022.#MCM v Centrala studiestödsnämnden.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Överklagandenämnden för studiestöd.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of movement for persons – Article 45 TFEU – Equal treatment – Social advantages – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Financial aid for higher education studies in another Member State – Residence requirement – Alternative requirement of social integration for non-resident students – Situation of a student who is a national of the State granting the aid, residing since birth in the State of studies.#Case C-638/20.cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24190Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 7 April 2022.#M2Beauté Cosmetics GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 1(2)(b) – Definition of ‘medicinal product by function’ – Absence of a scientific study – Scientific knowledge on a structural analogue – Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 – Cosmetic product – Specific beneficial effects on human health – Direct or indirect beneficial effects – Positive effects on appearance.#Case C-616/20.cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24191Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 7 April 2022.#Admiral Gaming Network Srl and Others v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Restrictions – Betting and gambling – Licences for the management of games played on gaming machines – National legislation imposing a levy on licence holders – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.#Joined Cases C-475/20 to C-482/20.cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24192Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 7 April 2022.#TU and RE v Google LLC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Directive 95/46/EC – Article 12(b) – Point (a) of the first paragraph of Article 14 – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 17(3)(a) – Operator of an internet search engine – Research carried out on the basis of a person’s name – Displaying a link to articles containing allegedly inaccurate information in the list of search results – Displaying, in the form of thumbnails, photographs illustrating those articles in the list of results of an image search – Request for de-referencing made to the operator of the search engine – Weighing-up of fundamental rights – Articles 7, 8, 11 and 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligations and responsibilities of the operator of the search engine in respect of processing a request for de-referencing – Burden of proof on the person requesting de-referencing.#Case C-460/20.cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24193Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 7 April 2022.#Volotea, SA and easyJet Airline Company Ltd. v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – European Commission decision on compensation to Sardinian airports for public service obligations – Existence of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market, granted by the Italian Republic to airlines through airport operators – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Proof of the existence of an advantage – Determination of the amount – Market economy operator principle – Applicability and application – Test of the private acquirer of goods or services – Conditions – Burden of proof.#Joined Cases C-331/20 P and C-343/20 P.cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24195Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 7 April 2022.#European Commission v Valencia Club de Fútbol, SAD.#Appeal – State aid – Public guarantee granted by a public entity – Loans to three football clubs from the Community of Valencia (Valencia CF, Hércules CF and Elche CF) – Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market – Annulment of the decision in so far as it concerns Valencia CF – Concept of ‘advantage’ – Assessment of the existence of an advantage – Guarantee Notice – Interpretation – Duty of care on the part of the European Commission – Burden of proof – Distortion.#Case C-211/20 P.cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24196Case C-521/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — J.P. v B.d.S.L. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 1999/62/EC — Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures — Tolls — Non-payment — Penalties — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Ne bis in idem principle — Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure — Lack of sufficient information — No link between the interpretation of EU law sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24197Case C-668/20: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Y GmbH v Hauptzollamt (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Classification of goods — Headings 1302, 3301 and 3302 — Extracted vanilla oleoresin — Excise duties — Directive 92/83/EEC — Exemptions — Article 27(1)(e) — Definition of ‘flavour’ — Directive 92/12/EEC — Excise Committee of the European Commission — Powers)cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24198Case C-645/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — V A, Z A v TP (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 — Article 10 — Subsidiary jurisdiction in matters of succession — Deceased person habitually resident at the time of his or her death in a State that is not bound by Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 — Deceased person who is a national of a Member State and has assets in that Member State — Obligation for the court of that Member State seised to examine of its own motion the criteria as regards its subsidiary jurisdiction — Appointment of an administrator of the estate)cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24199Case C-568/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — J v H Limited (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Scope — Article 2(a) — Concept of ‘judgment’ — Order for payment made in another Member State after a summary contested examination of a judgment given in a third State — Article 39 — Enforceability in Member States)cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.
24200Case C-561/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel — Belgium) — Q, R, S v United Airlines Inc. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Connecting flight consisting of two legs — Significant delay to final destination caused in the second leg of that flight linking two airports in a third country — Validity of that regulation under international law)cjeu_case · 7 апреля 2022 г.