23941Case C-510/20: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 April 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 258 TFEU — Environment — Directive 2008/56/EC — Marine environmental policy — Article 5 — Marine strategies — Article 17(2) and (3) — Failure to review, within the time limits, the initial assessment, the determination of good environmental status and the environmental targets — Failure to send to the European Commission, within the time limts, details of any updates made following the reviews)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23942Joined Cases C-415/20, C-419/20 and C-427/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Gräfendorfer Geflügel- und Tiefkühlfeinkost Produktions GmbH (C-415/20), F. Reyher Nchfg. GmbH & Co. KG vertr. d. d. Komplementärin Verwaltungsgesellschaft F. Reyher Nchfg. mbH (C-419/20), Flexi Montagetechnik GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg (C-415/20 and C-419/20), Hauptzollamt Kiel (C-427/20) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Rights to the repayment or to the payment of sums of money levied or refused by a Member State in breach of EU law — Anti-dumping duties, import duties, export refunds and financial penalties — Concept of ‘breach of EU law’ — Misinterpretation or misapplication of EU law — Finding of a breach of EU law by a Court of the European Union or by a national court — Right to the payment of interest — Period covered by that payment of interest)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23943Case C-319/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, formerly Facebook Ireland Limited v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Article 80 — Representation of the data subjects by a not-for-profit association — Representative action brought by a consumer protection association in the absence of a mandate and independently of the infringement of specific rights of a data subject — Action based on the prohibition of unfair commercial practices, the infringement of a consumer protection law or the prohibition of the use of invalid general terms and conditions)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23944Case C-237/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging v Heiploeg Seafood International BV, Heitrans International BV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2001/23/EC — Articles 3 to 5 — Transfers of undertakings — Safeguarding of employees’ rights — Exceptions — Insolvency proceedings — ‘Pre-pack’ — Survival of an undertaking — Transfer of (part of) an undertaking following a declaration of insolvency preceded by a pre-pack)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23945Case C-86/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně — Czech Republic) — Vinařství U Kapličky s.r.o. v Státní zemědělská a potravinářská inspekce (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products — Wine — Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 — Rules concerning marketing — Article 80 — Oenological practices — Prohibition on marketing — Article 90 — Imports of wine — Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 — Article 43 — V I 1 document — Certificate of production of consignments of wine in accordance with recommended and authorised oenological practices — Probative value — Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Article 89(4) — Penalties — Marketing of wine from a third country — Wine having undergone unauthorised oenological practices — Exoneration from liability — Burden of proof)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23946Case C-79/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 April 2022 — Yieh United Steel Corp. v European Commission, Eurofer, Association européenne de l’acier, ASBL (Appeal — Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1429 — Imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 2 — Calculation of the normal value — Calculation of the production cost — Production losses — Refusal to deduct the value of recycled scrap — Determination of the normal value on the basis of sales of the like product intended for domestic consumption — Exclusion from the basis of calculation used to determine the normal value of sales on the domestic market of the exporting country where those sales concern products intended for export)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23947Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of aspartame originating in the People’s Republic of China – Regulations No 1225/2009 and 2016/1036 – Temporal scope – Article 2(7) – Market economy treatment – Denied – Article 2(10) – Adjustments – Burden of proof – Article 3 – Determination of injury – Duty of care of the European Commission.#Case C-666/19 P.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23948Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of aspartame originating in the People’s Republic of China – Regulations No 1225/2009 and 2016/1036 – Temporal scope – Article 2(7) – Market economy treatment – Denied – Article 2(10) – Adjustments – Burden of proof – Article 3 – Determination of injury – Duty of care of the European Commission.#Case C-666/19 P.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23949Case C-666/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 — Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission, Hyet Sweet SAS (Appeal — Dumping — Imports of aspartame originating in the People’s Republic of China — Regulations No 1225/2009 and 2016/1036 — Temporal scope — Article 2(7) — Market economy treatment — Denied — Article 2(10) — Adjustments — Burden of proof — Article 3 — Determination of injury — Duty of care of the European Commission)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23950Case T-228/22: Action brought on 27 April 2022 — Casablanca Clothing v EUIPO — Adrien (CASABLANCA TENNIS CLUB)cjeu_case · 27 апреля 2022 г.
23951Case T-227/22: Action brought on 27 April 2022 — Cylus Cyber Security v EUIPO — Cylance (CYLUS)cjeu_case · 27 апреля 2022 г.
23952Case C-2/22: Order of the President of the Court of 27 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Erfurt — Germany) — HK v Allianz Lebensversicherungs AGcjeu_case · 27 апреля 2022 г.
23953Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 27 April 2022.#Robert Roos and Others v European Parliament.#Public health – Requirement to present a valid EU digital COVID-19 certificate to access the Parliament’s buildings – Legal basis – Freedom and independence of Members of the European Parliament – Obligation to ensure the health of staff in the service of the European Union – Parliamentary immunity – Processing of personal data – Right to respect for private life – Right to physical integrity – Right to security – Equal treatment – Proportionality.#Joined Cases T-710/21 and T-722/21.cjeu_case · 27 апреля 2022 г.
23954Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 27 April 2022.#Robert Roos and Others v European Parliament.#Public health – Requirement to present a valid EU digital COVID-19 certificate to access the Parliament’s buildings – Legal basis – Freedom and independence of Members of the European Parliament – Obligation to ensure the health of staff in the service of the European Union – Parliamentary immunity – Processing of personal data – Right to respect for private life – Right to physical integrity – Right to security – Equal treatment – Proportionality.#Joined Cases T-710/21 and T-722/21.cjeu_case · 27 апреля 2022 г.
23955Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Leon Leonard Johan Veen v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of the Member States – Fight against crime – Communication of information by Europol to a Member State – Alleged unauthorised data processing – Regulation (EU) 2016/794 – Article 50(1) – Non-material harm.#Case T-436/21.cjeu_case · 27 апреля 2022 г.
23956Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Leon Leonard Johan Veen v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of the Member States – Fight against crime – Communication of information by Europol to a Member State – Alleged unauthorised data processing – Regulation (EU) 2016/794 – Article 50(1) – Non-material harm.#Case T-436/21.cjeu_case · 27 апреля 2022 г.
23957Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark LOPEZ DE HARO – Earlier EU word mark LOPEZ DE HEREDIA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-210/21.cjeu_case · 27 апреля 2022 г.
23958Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark LOPEZ DE HARO – Earlier EU word mark LOPEZ DE HEREDIA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-210/21.cjeu_case · 27 апреля 2022 г.
23959Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#LG Electronics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark SmartThinQ – Earlier national figurative mark SMARTTHING – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Translation of the list of goods covered by the earlier mark into the language of the proceedings – Genuine use of the earlier mark.#Case T-181/21.cjeu_case · 27 апреля 2022 г.
23960Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#LG Electronics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark SmartThinQ – Earlier national figurative mark SMARTTHING – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Translation of the list of goods covered by the earlier mark into the language of the proceedings – Genuine use of the earlier mark.#Case T-181/21.cjeu_case · 27 апреля 2022 г.