23921Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Gräfendorfer Geflügel- und Tiefkühlfeinkost Produktions GmbH and Others v Hauptzollamt Hamburg and Hauptzollamt Kiel.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Rights to the repayment or to the payment of sums of money levied or refused by a Member State in breach of EU law – Anti-dumping duties, import duties, export refunds and financial penalties – Concept of ‘breach of EU law’ – Misinterpretation or misapplication of EU law – Finding of a breach of EU law by a Court of the European Union or by a national court – Right to the payment of interest – Period covered by that payment of interest.#Joined Cases C-415/20, C-419/20 and C-427/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23922Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Meta Platforms Ireland Limited v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 80 – Representation of the data subjects by a not-for-profit association – Representative action brought by a consumer protection association in the absence of a mandate and independently of the infringement of specific rights of a data subject – Action based on the prohibition of unfair commercial practices, the infringement of a consumer protection law or the prohibition of the use of invalid general terms and conditions.#Case C-319/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23923Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Meta Platforms Ireland Limited v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 80 – Representation of the data subjects by a not-for-profit association – Representative action brought by a consumer protection association in the absence of a mandate and independently of the infringement of specific rights of a data subject – Action based on the prohibition of unfair commercial practices, the infringement of a consumer protection law or the prohibition of the use of invalid general terms and conditions.#Case C-319/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23924Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging v Heiploeg Seafood International BV and Heitrans International BV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2001/23/EC – Articles 3 to 5 – Transfers of undertakings – Safeguarding of employees’ rights – Exceptions – Insolvency proceedings – ‘Pre-pack’ – Survival of an undertaking – Transfer of (part of) an undertaking following a declaration of insolvency preceded by a pre-pack.#Case C-237/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23925Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging v Heiploeg Seafood International BV and Heitrans International BV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2001/23/EC – Articles 3 to 5 – Transfers of undertakings – Safeguarding of employees’ rights – Exceptions – Insolvency proceedings – ‘Pre-pack’ – Survival of an undertaking – Transfer of (part of) an undertaking following a declaration of insolvency preceded by a pre-pack.#Case C-237/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23926Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Vinařství U Kapličky s.r.o. v Státní zemědělská a potravinářská inspekce.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products – Wine – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Rules concerning marketing – Article 80 – Oenological practices – Prohibition on marketing – Article 90 – Imports of wine – Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 – Article 43 – V I 1 document – Certificate of production of consignments of wine in accordance with recommended or authorised oenological practices – Probative value – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 89(4) – Penalties – Marketing of wine from a third country – Wine having undergone unauthorised oenological practices – Exoneration from liability – Burden of proof.#Case C-86/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23927Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Vinařství U Kapličky s.r.o. v Státní zemědělská a potravinářská inspekce.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products – Wine – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Rules concerning marketing – Article 80 – Oenological practices – Prohibition on marketing – Article 90 – Imports of wine – Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 – Article 43 – V I 1 document – Certificate of production of consignments of wine in accordance with recommended or authorised oenological practices – Probative value – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 89(4) – Penalties – Marketing of wine from a third country – Wine having undergone unauthorised oenological practices – Exoneration from liability – Burden of proof.#Case C-86/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23928Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Yieh United Steel Corp. v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1429 – Imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 – Article 2 – Calculation of the normal value – Calculation of the production cost – Production losses – Refusal to deduct the value of recycled scrap – Determination of the normal value on the basis of sales of the like product intended for domestic consumption – Exclusion from the basis of calculation used to determine the normal value of sales on the domestic market of the exporting country where those sales concern products intended for export.#Case C-79/20 P.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23929Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Yieh United Steel Corp. v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1429 – Imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 – Article 2 – Calculation of the normal value – Calculation of the production cost – Production losses – Refusal to deduct the value of recycled scrap – Determination of the normal value on the basis of sales of the like product intended for domestic consumption – Exclusion from the basis of calculation used to determine the normal value of sales on the domestic market of the exporting country where those sales concern products intended for export.#Case C-79/20 P.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23930Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 28 April 2022.#Industriegewerkschaft Metall (IG Metall) and ver.di - Vereinte Dienstleistungsgewerkschaft v SAP SE and SE-Betriebsrat der SAP SE.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – European company – Directive 2001/86/EC – Involvement of employees in decision-making within the European company – Article 4(4) – European company established by means of transformation – Content of the negotiated agreement – Election of employees’ representatives as members of the Supervisory Board – Election procedure providing for a separate ballot in respect of the trade union representatives.#Case C-677/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23931Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 28 April 2022.#ROI Land Investments Ltd. v FD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 6 – Defendant not domiciled in a Member State – Article 17 – Jurisdiction over consumer contracts – Concept of ‘trade or profession’/‘professional activities’ – Article 21 – Jurisdiction over individual contracts of employment – Concept of ‘employer’ – Relationship of subordination – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Applicable law – Article 6 – Individual contract of employment – Letter of comfort between the employee and a third party company guaranteeing performance of the employer’s obligations towards that employee.#Case C-604/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23932Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 28 April 2022.#Polskie Linie Lotnicze 'LOT' SA v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 16 – Compensation and assistance to passengers – Task of the national body responsible for the enforcement of that regulation – National legislation conferring on that body the power to order an air carrier to pay compensation due to a passenger – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to seek remedy before a tribunal.#Case C-597/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23933Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 28 April 2022.#BFF Finance Iberia S.A.U v Gerencia Regional de Salud de la Junta de Castilla y León.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo Valladolid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Recovery from a public authority of debts assigned by undertakings to a collection agency – Compensation for recovery costs incurred by the creditor in the event of late payment by the debtor – Article 6 – Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 – Transactions between undertakings and public authorities – Article 4 – Procedure for ascertaining the conformity of goods or services – Payment period – Article 2(8) – Definition of ‘amount due’ – Inclusion of value added tax for the purpose of calculating default interest.#Case C-585/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23934Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 28 April 2022.#L.F. v S.C.R.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Establishment of a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of religion or belief – Internal rule of a private undertaking prohibiting any manifestation, in the workplace, of religious, philosophical or political belief – Prohibition including words, clothing, or any other means of manifesting those beliefs – Wearing of an item of religious clothing.#Case C-344/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23935Case C-642/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Giustizia amministrativa per la Regione siciliana — Italy) — Caruter s.r.l. v S.R.R. Messina Provincia S.c.P.A. and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2014/24/EU — Public procurement — Article 63 — Reliance by a group of economic operators on the capacities of other entities — Possibility for the contracting authority to require that certain critical tasks be performed by a participant of that group — National legislation stipulating that the undertaking representing that group must satisfy the majority of the criteria and perform the majority of the services)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23936Case C-637/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Skatteverket v DSAB Destination Stockholm AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2006/112/EC — Common system of value added tax — Article 30a(1) — Concept of ‘voucher’ — Article 30a(3) — Concept of ‘“multi-purpose” voucher’ — Sale of a card entitling the cardholder to a number of tourist services for a limited period)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23937Case C-612/20: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj — Romania) — Happy Education SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Cluj (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(i) — Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest — Exemptions related to children’s or young people’s education, school or university education — Supply of educational services supplementing the school curriculum — Private law body providing those services for commercial purposes)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23938Case C-559/20: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken — Germany) — Koch Media GmbH v FU (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 14 — Concepts of ‘legal costs’ and ‘other expenses’ — Warning notice in order to ensure enforcement of intellectual property rights out of court — Lawyers’ fees — Classification — National provision limiting the amount of those costs recoverable under certain conditions)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23939Case C-531/20: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — NovaText GmbH v Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 3 — General obligation concerning the measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights — Article 14 — Concept of ‘reasonable and proportionate legal costs’ — Consultation of a patent lawyer — Absence of opportunity for the national court to assess the reasonableness and proportionality of the costs to be borne by the unsuccessful party)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23940Case C-510/20: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 April 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 258 TFEU — Environment — Directive 2008/56/EC — Marine environmental policy — Article 5 — Marine strategies — Article 17(2) and (3) — Failure to review, within the time limits, the initial assessment, the determination of good environmental status and the environmental targets — Failure to send to the European Commission, within the time limts, details of any updates made following the reviews)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.