23901Case C-277/21: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — Secrétariat général de l’Enseignement catholique ASBL (SeGEC) and Others v Institut des Comptes nationaux (ICN), Banque nationale de Belgique (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 — European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union — Annex A, paragraph 20.15 — Control exercised by an institute of national accounts over the organising authorities of educational establishments constituted in the form of non-profit institutions — Educational establishments receiving public financing and enjoying freedom of education guaranteed by the Constitution — Annex A, paragraph 20.15, second sentence — Concept of ‘public intervention in the form of general regulations applicable to all units working in the same activity’ — Scope — Annex A, paragraph 20.15, first sentence — Annex A, paragraph 2.39(b), paragraph 20.15(b) and paragraph 20.309(h) — Concept of ‘excessive regulation’ — Scope)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23902Case C-251/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — ‘Piltenes meži’ SIA v Lauku atbalsta dienests (Reference for a preliminary ruling — European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 — Support for rural development by the EAFRD — Article 30 — Natura 2000 payments — Scope — Application for aid in respect of a micro-reserve created in a forest that is not part of the Natura 2000 network, with the purpose of protecting a species of wild bird — Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 — Block exemption for certain types of aid to the agriculture and forestry sectors — Application to aid co-financed by means of EU resources — No application to undertakings in difficulty)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23903Joined Cases C-160/21 and C-217/21: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo — Bulgaria) — ‘Nikopolis AD Istrum 2010’ EOOD (C-160/21), ‘Agro — eko 2013’ EOOD (C-217/21) v Izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond ‘Zemedelie’ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common agricultural policy — Direct support schemes — Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Payments to beneficiaries — Article 75 — Time limit for payment — Compliance — None — Tacit refusal of the application for aid)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23904Case C-89/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Romega’ UAB v Valstybinė maisto ir veterinarijos tarnyba (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Food law — Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 — Microbiological criteria for foodstuffs — Article 1 — Annex I — Fresh poultry meat — Checks by the competent national authorities for the presence of the salmonella serotypes listed in point 1.28 of Chapter 1 of that annex — Checks for the presence of other pathogenic microorganisms — Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 — Article 14(8) — Discretion of the national authorities — Scope)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23905Case C-86/21: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla y León — Spain) — Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León v Delia (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for workers — Article 45 TFEU — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Equal treatment — National system for the recognition of health professionals’ career progression — Failure to take professional experience gained in another Member State’s health services into consideration — Barrier)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23906Case C-72/21: Judgment of the Court (Eight Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — SIA ‘PRODEX’ v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff headings — Subheading 4418 20 — Scope — Doors and their frames and thresholds — MDF panels and mouldings — First sentence of general rule 2(a) for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature — Incomplete or unfinished article — Concept)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23907Case C-44/21: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I — Germany) — Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG v HARTING Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Harting Electric GmbH & Co. KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 9(1) — European patent — Interim measures — Power of national judicial authorities to issue an interlocutory injunction to prevent an imminent infringement of an intellectual property right — National case-law dismissing applications for interim measures where the validity of the patent in question has not been confirmed, at the very least, by a decision given at first instance in opposition or invalidity proceedings — Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law)cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23908Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Caruter s.r.l. v S.R.R. Messina Provincia S.c.P.A. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/24/EU – Public procurement – Article 63 – Reliance by a group of economic operators on the capacities of other entities – Possibility for the contracting authority to require certain critical tasks to be performed by a participant in that group – National legislation requiring that the agent must fulfil the majority of the requirements and provide the majority of the services.#Case C-642/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23909Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Caruter s.r.l. v S.R.R. Messina Provincia S.c.P.A. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Giustizia amministrativa per la Regione siciliana.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/24/EU – Public procurement – Article 63 – Reliance by a group of economic operators on the capacities of other entities – Possibility for the contracting authority to require certain critical tasks to be performed by a participant in that group – National legislation requiring that the agent must fulfil the majority of the requirements and provide the majority of the services.#Case C-642/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23910Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Skatteverket v DSAB Destination Stockholm AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2006/112/EC – Common system of value added tax – Article 30a(1) – Concept of ‘voucher’ – Article 30a(3) – Concept of ‘“multi-purpose” voucher’ – Sale of a card entitling the cardholder to a number of tourist services for a limited period.#Case C-637/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23911Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Skatteverket v DSAB Destination Stockholm AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2006/112/EC – Common system of value added tax – Article 30a(1) – Concept of ‘voucher’ – Article 30a(3) – Concept of ‘“multi-purpose” voucher’ – Sale of a card entitling the cardholder to a number of tourist services for a limited period.#Case C-637/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23912Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Happy Education SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca and Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 132(1)(i) – Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest – Exemptions related to children’s or young people’s education, school or university education – Supply of educational services supplementing the school curriculum – Private law body providing those services for commercial purposes.#Case C-612/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23913Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Happy Education SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca and Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Cluj.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 132(1)(i) – Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest – Exemptions related to children’s or young people’s education, school or university education – Supply of educational services supplementing the school curriculum – Private law body providing those services for commercial purposes.#Case C-612/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23914Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Koch Media GmbH v FU.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property rights – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 14 – Concepts of ‘legal costs’ and ‘other expenses’ – Warning notice to ensure enforcement of intellectual property rights out of court – Lawyers’ fees – Classification – National provision limiting the amount of those costs recoverable under certain conditions.#Case C-559/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23915Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Koch Media GmbH v FU.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property rights – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 14 – Concepts of ‘legal costs’ and ‘other expenses’ – Warning notice to ensure enforcement of intellectual property rights out of court – Lawyers’ fees – Classification – National provision limiting the amount of those costs recoverable under certain conditions.#Case C-559/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23916Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#NovaText GmbH v Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property rights – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 3 – General obligation concerning the measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights – Article 14 – Concept of ‘reasonable and proportionate legal costs’ – Consultation of a patent lawyer – Absence of opportunity for the national court to assess the reasonableness and proportionality of the costs to be borne by the unsuccessful party.#Case C-531/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23917Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#NovaText GmbH v Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property rights – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 3 – General obligation concerning the measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights – Article 14 – Concept of ‘reasonable and proportionate legal costs’ – Consultation of a patent lawyer – Absence of opportunity for the national court to assess the reasonableness and proportionality of the costs to be borne by the unsuccessful party.#Case C-531/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23918Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Environment – Directive 2008/56/EC – Marine environmental policy – Article 5 – Marine strategies – Article 17(2) and (3) – Failure to review, within the time limits, the initial assessment, the determination of good environmental status and the environmental targets – Failure to send to the European Commission, within the time limits, details of any updates made following the reviews.#Case C-510/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23919Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Environment – Directive 2008/56/EC – Marine environmental policy – Article 5 – Marine strategies – Article 17(2) and (3) – Failure to review, within the time limits, the initial assessment, the determination of good environmental status and the environmental targets – Failure to send to the European Commission, within the time limits, details of any updates made following the reviews.#Case C-510/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.
23920Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Gräfendorfer Geflügel- und Tiefkühlfeinkost Produktions GmbH and Others v Hauptzollamt Hamburg and Hauptzollamt Kiel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Rights to the repayment or to the payment of sums of money levied or refused by a Member State in breach of EU law – Anti-dumping duties, import duties, export refunds and financial penalties – Concept of ‘breach of EU law’ – Misinterpretation or misapplication of EU law – Finding of a breach of EU law by a Court of the European Union or by a national court – Right to the payment of interest – Period covered by that payment of interest.#Joined Cases C-415/20, C-419/20 and C-427/20.cjeu_case · 28 апреля 2022 г.