Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
23849

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 May 2022.#S.H. v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Sibiu and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Deduction of input tax paid in relation to the purchase, building and alteration of immovable property – Ex officio revocation of a taxable person’s identification for VAT purposes – Adjustment of the initial deduction – Reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law.#Case C-627/21.

cjeu_case ·
23850

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 May 2022.#S.H. v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Sibiu and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Deduction of input tax paid in relation to the purchase, building and alteration of immovable property – Ex officio revocation of a taxable person’s identification for VAT purposes – Adjustment of the initial deduction – Reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law.#Case C-627/21.

cjeu_case ·
23851

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2022.#Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s. v České dráhy a.s. and Others and České dráhy a.s.v Univerzita Pardubice and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Decisions of the regulatory body – Article 56(10) – Judicial review – National law providing for the jurisdiction of civil courts – Detailed procedural rules governing the appeal – Compatibility with Directive 2012/34 – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Joined Cases C-221/21 and C-222/21.

cjeu_case ·
23852

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2022.#Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s. v České dráhy a.s. and Others and České dráhy a.s.v Univerzita Pardubice and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Decisions of the regulatory body – Article 56(10) – Judicial review – National law providing for the jurisdiction of civil courts – Detailed procedural rules governing the appeal – Compatibility with Directive 2012/34 – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Joined Cases C-221/21 and C-222/21.

cjeu_case ·
23853

Case C-627/21: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia — Romania) — SH v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Sibiu, Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Deduction of input tax paid in relation to the purchase, building and alteration of immovable property — Ex officio revocation of a taxable person’s identification for VAT purposes — Adjustment of the initial deduction — Reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law)

cjeu_case ·
23854

Joined Cases C-221/21 and C-222/21: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1 — Czech Republic) — Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s., PKP Cargo International a.s., PDV Railway a.s., KŽC Doprava, s.r.o. (C-221/21), and České dráhy a.s. v Univerzita Pardubice and Others (C-222/21) (References for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Rail transport — Directive 2012/34/EU — Decisions of the regulatory body — Article 56(10) — Judicial review — National law providing for the jurisdiction of the civil courts — Rules governing the action — Compatibility with Directive 2012/34 — Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

cjeu_case ·