23561Case T-435/21: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — TK v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2020 promotion exercise — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 15 — Comparing merits — Equal treatment — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23562Case T-256/21: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Domator24.com Paweł Nowak v EUIPO — Siwek and Didyk (Armchair) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered community design representing an armchair — Earlier community design — Proof of disclosure — Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23563Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#UC v Ministero dell'istruzione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4(1) – Principle of non-discrimination – Concept of ‘employment conditions’ – Allowance to support the in-service training of teachers and to enhance their professional skills.#Case C-450/21.cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23564Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#UC v Ministero dell'istruzione.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Vercelli.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4(1) – Principle of non-discrimination – Concept of ‘employment conditions’ – Allowance to support the in-service training of teachers and to enhance their professional skills.#Case C-450/21.cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23565Case C-450/21: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Vercelli — Italy) — UC v Ministero dell’Istruzione (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4(1) — Principle of non-discrimination — Concept of ‘employment conditions’ — Allowance to support the in-service training of teachers and to enhance their professional skills)cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23566Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Aid granted to Adriatica for the period from January 1992 to July 1994 in relation to the Brindisi/Corfu/Igoumenitsa/Patras connection – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Interest accrued – Limitation period – New aid – Incompatibility with the internal market – Effects of a cartel on the market – Excessive duration of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration.#Case T-601/20.cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23567Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Aid granted to Adriatica for the period from January 1992 to July 1994 in relation to the Brindisi/Corfu/Igoumenitsa/Patras connection – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Interest accrued – Limitation period – New aid – Incompatibility with the internal market – Effects of a cartel on the market – Excessive duration of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration.#Case T-601/20.cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23568Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Rescue aid – Compatibility with the internal market – Period of six months – Extension – Requirement to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty – Tax exemption – Advantage – Selective nature – Effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Excessive duration of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration.#Case T-593/20.cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23569Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Rescue aid – Compatibility with the internal market – Period of six months – Extension – Requirement to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty – Tax exemption – Advantage – Selective nature – Effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Excessive duration of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration.#Case T-593/20.cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23570Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 May 2022.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – German air transport market – Loan granted by Germany to Condor Flugdienst – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty – Intrinsic difficulties that are not the result of an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group – Difficulties that are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself – Risk of disruption to an important service.#Case T-577/20.cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23571Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 May 2022.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – German air transport market – Loan granted by Germany to Condor Flugdienst – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty – Intrinsic difficulties that are not the result of an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group – Difficulties that are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself – Risk of disruption to an important service.#Case T-577/20.cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23572Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Eurobolt BV and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Extension of the anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China to imports consigned from Malaysia – Compliance with a judgment of the Court of Justice – Article 266 TFEU – Re-imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Non-retroactivity – Effective judicial protection – Principle of good administration – Competence of the author of the act.#Case T-479/20.cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23573Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Eurobolt BV and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Extension of the anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China to imports consigned from Malaysia – Compliance with a judgment of the Court of Justice – Article 266 TFEU – Re-imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Non-retroactivity – Effective judicial protection – Principle of good administration – Competence of the author of the act.#Case T-479/20.cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23574Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 May 2022 (Extracts).#Amer Foz v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to pursue an economic activity – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial – Determination of listing criteria.#Case T-296/20.cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23575Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 May 2022 (Extracts).#Amer Foz v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to pursue an economic activity – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial – Determination of listing criteria.#Case T-296/20.cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23576Case T-601/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Tirrenia di navigazione v Commission (State aid — Maritime transport — Service of general economic interest — Aid granted to Adriatica for the period from January 1992 to July 1994 in relation to the Brindisi/Corfu/Igoumenitsa/Patras connection — Decision declaring the aid unlawful — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Interest accrued — Limitation period — New aid — Incompatibility with the internal market — Effects of a cartel on the market — Excessive duration of the procedure — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Principle of good administration)cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23577Case T-593/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Tirrenia di navigazione v Commission (State aid — Maritime transport — Service of general economic interest — Decision declaring the aid unlawful — Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Rescue aid — Compatibility with the internal market — Period of six months — Extension — Requirement to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan — Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty — Tax exemption — Advantage — Selective nature — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Excessive duration of the procedure — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Principle of good administration)cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23578Case T-577/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Ryanair v Commission (Condor; rescue aid) (State aid — German air transport market — Loan granted by Germany to Condor Flugdienst — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Article 107(3)(c) TFEU — Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty — Intrinsic difficulties that are not the result of an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group — Difficulties that are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself — Risk of disruption to an important service)cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23579Case T-479/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Eurobolt and Others v Commission (Dumping — Extension of the anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China to imports consigned from Malaysia — Compliance with a judgment of the Court of Justice — Article 266 TFEU — Re-imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty — Non-retroactivity — Effective judicial protection — Principle of good administration — Competence of the author of the act)cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.
23580Case T-296/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Foz v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Error of assessment — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to pursue an economic activity — Misuse of powers — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to a fair trial — Determination of listing criteria)cjeu_case · 18 мая 2022 г.