23301Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#EMCS ltd. v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Provision of temporary agency workers for EASO – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Equal treatment – Principle of transparency – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-621/20.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2022 г.
23302Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Guangxi Xin Fu Yuan Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in China – Review investigation – Circumvention – Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Related companies – Procedural obligations – Article 5(10) and (11) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Articles 6.1, 6.2 and 12.1 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement – Rights of the defence – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-144/20.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2022 г.
23303Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Guangxi Xin Fu Yuan Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in China – Review investigation – Circumvention – Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Related companies – Procedural obligations – Article 5(10) and (11) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Articles 6.1, 6.2 and 12.1 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement – Rights of the defence – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-144/20.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2022 г.
23304Case T-738/20: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Deutschtec v EUIPO — Group A (HOLUX) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark HOLUX — Earlier international registration in respect of the word mark HOLUX — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 8 июня 2022 г.
23305Case T-621/20: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — EMCS v EUAA (Public service contracts — Tender procedure — Provision of temporary agency workers for EASO — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Award of the contract to another tenderer — Equal treatment — Principle of transparency — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 8 июня 2022 г.
23306Case T-144/20: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Guangxi Xin Fu Yuan v Commission (Dumping — Imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in China — Review investigation — Circumvention — Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Related companies — Procedural obligations — Article 5(10) and (11) of Regulation 2016/1036 — Articles 6.1, 6.2 and 12.1 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement — Rights of the defence — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations — Manifest error of assessment)cjeu_case · 8 июня 2022 г.
23307Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 June 2022.#United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and ITV plc v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the United Kingdom in favour of certain multinational groups – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid paid – Advance tax rulings – Tax regime relating to the financing of groups and concerning in particular controlled foreign companies – Selective tax advantages.#Cases T-363/19 and T-456/19.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2022 г.
23308Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 June 2022.#United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the United Kingdom in favour of certain multinational groups – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid paid – Advance tax rulings – Tax regime relating to the financing of groups and concerning in particular controlled foreign companies – Selective tax advantages.#Case T-363/19.cjeu_case · 8 июня 2022 г.
23309Case T-363/19 and T-456/19: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — United Kingdom and ITV v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme implemented by the United Kingdom in favour of certain multinational groups — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid paid — Advance tax rulings — Tax regime relating to the financing of groups and concerning in particular controlled foreign companies — Selective tax advantages)cjeu_case · 8 июня 2022 г.
23310Case T-339/22: Action brought on 7 June 2022 — Chocolates Lacasa Internacional v EUIPO — Esquitino Madrid (Conguitos)cjeu_case · 7 июня 2022 г.
23311Case T-336/22: Action brought on 7 June 2022 — PN v Court of Justice of the European Unioncjeu_case · 7 июня 2022 г.
23313Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 7 June 2022.#SES Astra SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Article 40, second paragraph, second sentence, of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Dispute between a Member State and an Institution of the European Union – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Dismissal.#Case C-212/22 P(I).cjeu_case · 7 июня 2022 г.
23314Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 7 June 2022.#SES Astra SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Article 40, second paragraph, second sentence, of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Dispute between a Member State and an Institution of the European Union – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Dismissal.#Case C-212/22 P(I).cjeu_case · 7 июня 2022 г.
23315Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 7 June 2022.#Magic Box Int. Toys SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-194/22 P.cjeu_case · 7 июня 2022 г.
23316Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 7 June 2022.#Magic Box Int. Toys SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-194/22 P.cjeu_case · 7 июня 2022 г.
23317Case C-367/22 P: Appeal brought on 7 June 2022 by Air Canada against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 30 March 2022 in Case T-326/17, Air Canada v Commissioncjeu_case · 7 июня 2022 г.
23318Case C-366/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 7 June 2022 — Viterra Hungary Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóságacjeu_case · 7 июня 2022 г.
23319Case C-365/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 7 June 2022 — IT v État belgecjeu_case · 7 июня 2022 г.
23320Case C-364/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Minden (Germany) lodged on 7 June 2022 — J.B., S.B. and F.B. v Federal Republic of Germanycjeu_case · 7 июня 2022 г.