Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
2304

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 January 2026.#OMV Petrom Marketing v Compania Naţională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Answer admitting of no reasonable doubt – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Trans-European transport network – Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 – Road transport infrastructure – Article 19(d) – Parking areas – Article 39(2)(c) – Rest areas – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 8a – Information about safe and secure parking areas – National legislation prohibiting the construction of motorway service areas, including secure parking areas, on private land – Article 56 TFEU – Inapplicability – Purely internal situation.#Case C-439/25.

cjeu_case ·
2305

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 January 2026.#OMV Petrom Marketing v Compania Naţională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Answer admitting of no reasonable doubt – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Trans-European transport network – Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 – Road transport infrastructure – Article 19(d) – Parking areas – Article 39(2)(c) – Rest areas – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 8a – Information about safe and secure parking areas – National legislation prohibiting the construction of motorway service areas, including secure parking areas, on private land – Article 56 TFEU – Inapplicability – Purely internal situation.#Case C-439/25.

cjeu_case ·
2307

Case C-439/25, OMW Petrom Marketing: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 January 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timișoara – Romania) – OMW Petrom Marketing v Compania Națională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA, ZR, LN (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Answer admitting of no reasonable doubt – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Trans-European transport network – Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 – Road transport infrastructure – Article 19(d) – Parking areas – Article 39(2)(c) – Rest areas – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 8a – Information about safe and secure parking areas – National legislation prohibiting the construction of motorway service areas, including secure parking areas, on private land – Article 56 TFEU – Inapplicability – Purely internal situation)

cjeu_case ·
2309

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 January 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Admissibility – Decision (EU) 2021/3 – Position to be taken, on behalf of the European Union, at the reconvened sixty-third session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, established by the United Nations Economic and Social Council, on the scheduling of cannabis and cannabis-related substances under the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, and the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 – Position and vote of a Member State, both being contrary to that position of the European Union – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Effects of the alleged conduct as at the date of expiry of the deadline laid down in the reasoned opinion – Ongoing effects on the unity and consistency of the European Union’s international action – Article 3(2) TFEU – Exclusive external competence – Effect on common rules or alteration of their scope – Plea of illegality raised in the defence – Inadmissibility.#Case C-271/23.

cjeu_case ·
2310

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 January 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Admissibility – Decision (EU) 2021/3 – Position to be taken, on behalf of the European Union, at the reconvened sixty-third session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, established by the United Nations Economic and Social Council, on the scheduling of cannabis and cannabis-related substances under the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, and the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 – Position and vote of a Member State, both being contrary to that position of the European Union – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Effects of the alleged conduct as at the date of expiry of the deadline laid down in the reasoned opinion – Ongoing effects on the unity and consistency of the European Union’s international action – Article 3(2) TFEU – Exclusive external competence – Effect on common rules or alteration of their scope – Plea of illegality raised in the defence – Inadmissibility.#Case C-271/23.

cjeu_case ·
2311

Case C-271/23: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 January 2026 – European Commission v Hungary (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Admissibility – Decision (EU) 2021/3 – Position to be taken, on behalf of the European Union, at the reconvened sixty-third session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, established by the United Nations Economic and Social Council, on the scheduling of cannabis and cannabis-related substances under the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, and the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 – Position and vote of a Member State, both being contrary to that position of the European Union – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Effects of the alleged conduct as at the date of expiry of the deadline laid down in the reasoned opinion – Ongoing effects on the unity and consistency of the European Union’s international action – Article 3(2) TFEU – Exclusive external competence – Effect on common rules or alteration of their scope – Plea of illegality raised in the defence – Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·