23161Case C-698/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022 — Sony Optiarc Inc., Sony Optiarc America Inc. v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Optical disk drives — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 — Single and continuous infringement — Definition — Collusive agreements relating to procurement events concerning optical disk drives for notebook and desktop computers organised by two computer manufacturers)cjeu_case · 16 июня 2022 г.
23162Case C-697/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022 — Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics Inc. v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Optical disk drives — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 — Single and continuous infringement — Definition — Collusive agreements relating to procurement events concerning optical disk drives for notebook and desktop computers organised by two computer manufacturers)cjeu_case · 16 июня 2022 г.
23163Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 15 June 2022.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, coherence or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-121/22 P.cjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23164Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 15 June 2022.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, coherence or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-121/22 P.cjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23165Order of the Court of 15 June 2022.#Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, coherence or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-120/22 P.cjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23166Order of the Court of 15 June 2022.#Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, coherence or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-120/22 P.cjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23167Case C-399/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 15 June 2022 — Confédération paysanne v Ministère de l’agriculture et de la souveraineté alimentaire, Ministère de l’économie, des finances et de la souveraineté industrielle et numériquecjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23168Case C-398/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 15 June 2022 — Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlincjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23169Case C-397/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 15 June 2022 — Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlincjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23170Case C-396/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 15 June 2022 — Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlincjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23171Case C-394/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 15 June 2022 — Oilchart International NV v O.W. Bunker (Netherlands) BV, ING Bank NVcjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23172Case C-393/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Czech Republic) lodged on 15 June 2022 — EXTÉRIA, s. r. o. v Spravíme, s. r. o.cjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23173Case C-392/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats’s-Hertogenbosch (Netherlands) lodged on 15 June 2022 — X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheidcjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23174Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#F I S I Fibre sintetiche SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ECODOWN – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-338/21.cjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23175Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#F I S I Fibre sintetiche SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ECODOWN – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-338/21.cjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23176Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#QI v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Appraisal report – 2018 and 2019 appraisal exercises – Unsatisfactory appraisal of leadership performance – General implementing provisions of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations – Validation procedure – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-122/21.cjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23177Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#QI v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Appraisal report – 2018 and 2019 appraisal exercises – Unsatisfactory appraisal of leadership performance – General implementing provisions of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations – Validation procedure – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-122/21.cjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23178Case T-338/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — F I S I v EUIPO — Verband der Deutschen Daunen- und Federnindustrie (ECODOWN) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark ECODOWN — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23179Case T-122/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — QI v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Evaluation report — 2018 and 2019 evaluation exercises — Unsatisfactory evaluation of managerial performance — General implementing provisions of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Validation procedure — Principle of impartiality — Manifest error of assessment)cjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.
23180Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#Tubes Radiatori Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Community design representing a radiator – Earlier designs – Grounds for invalidity – Lack of individual character – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Freedom of the designer – Saturation of the state of the art – Overall impression.#Case T-380/20.cjeu_case · 15 июня 2022 г.