22541Ordonnance du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 14 juillet 2022.#Gilbert Collard contre Parlement européen et Groupe politique Identité et démocratie (ID).#Recours en annulation – Droit institutionnel – Membre du Parlement – Suspension et exclusion d’un député de son groupe politique – Absence d’imputabilité des décisions attaquées au Parlement – Irrecevabilité partielle.#Affaire T-53/22.cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22542Case T-439/22: Action brought on 14 July 2022 — Rada Perfumery v EUIPO — Prada (RADA PERFUMES)cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22543Case T-170/22 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 14 July 2022 — Telefónica de España v Commission (Interim relief — Public contracts for services — Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations (TESTA) — Application for interim measures — Lack of urgency)cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22544Case T-158/22: Order of the General Court of 14 July 2022 — Dehaen v EUIPO — National Geographic Society (NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC)cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22545Case T-157/22: Order of the General Court of 14 July 2022 — Dehaen v EUIPO — National Geographic Society (NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC)cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22546Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 14 July 2022.#Ignacio Carrasco SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-247/22 P.cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22547Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 14 July 2022.#Ignacio Carrasco SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-247/22 P.cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22548Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#CM v Finanzamt Österreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-25/22.cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22549Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#CM v Finanzamt Österreich.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-25/22.cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22550Case C-479/22 P: Appeal brought on 14 July 2022 by OC against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 4 May 2022 in Case T-384/20, OC v Commissioncjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22551Case C-472/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 14 July 2022 — NO v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneiracjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22552Case C-470/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrchní soud v Praze (Czech Republic) lodged on 14 July 2022 — Česká národní skupina Mezinárodní federace hudebního průmyslu, z. s. v I&Q GROUP, spol. s r.o., Hellspy SEcjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22553Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 14 July 2022.#Criminal proceedings against TL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Évora.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2010/64/EU – Right to interpretation and translation – Article 2(1) and Article 3(1) – Concept of an ‘essential document’ – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Article 3(1)(d) – Scope – Not implemented in domestic law – Direct effect – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 and Article 48(2) – European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Article 6 – Suspended prison sentence with probation – Breach of the probation conditions – Failure to translate an essential document and absence of an interpreter when that document was being drawn up – Revocation of the suspension of the prison sentence – Failure to translate the procedural acts relating to that revocation – Consequences for the validity of that revocation – Procedural defect resulting in relative nullity.#Case C-242/22 PPU.cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22554Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 14 July 2022.#Atlas Copco Airpower and Atlas Copco AB v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium – Admission of interventions in appeal proceedings against a judgment of the General Court – Annulment of the decision of the General Court – Referral of the case back to the General Court – Decision of the General Court refusing to place on the case file written observations on the judgment effecting that referral lodged by an intervener in the appeal – Implied decision of the General Court refusing to grant an intervener in the appeal the status of intervener before the General Court – Admissibility of the appeal – Status of intervener before the General Court of an intervener in the appeal.#Case C-31/22 P(I).#Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA/NV and Ampar BVBA v Magnetrol International NV and European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium – Admission of interventions in appeal proceedings against a judgment of the General Court – Annulment of the decision of the General Court – Referral of the case back to the General Court – Decision of the General Court refusing to place on the case file written observations on the judgment effecting that referral lodged by an intervener in the appeal – Implied decision of the General Court refusing to grant an intervener in the appeal the status of intervener before the General Court – Admissibility of the appeal – Status of intervener before the General Court of an intervener in the appeal.#Case C-32/22 P(I).#Soudal NV and Esko-Graphics BVBA v Magnetrol International NV and European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium – Admission of interventions in appeal proceedings against a judgment of the General Court – Annulment of the decision of the General Court – Referral of the case back to the General Court – Decision of the General Court refusing to place on the case file written observations on the judgment effecting that referral lodged by an intervener in the appeal – Implied decision of the General Court refusing to grant an intervener in the appeal the status of intervener before the General Court – Admissibility of the appeal – Status of intervener before the General Court of an intervener in the appeal – Appeal brought out of time – Excusable error.#Case C-74/22 P(I).cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22555Case C-25/22: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht — Austria) — CM v Finanzamt Österreich (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22556Case T-203/21: Order of the General Court of 14 July 2022 — IN.PRO.DI v EUIPO — Aiello (CAPRI) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22557Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#CC v VO.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility – Parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 8(1) and Article 61(a) – General jurisdiction – Perpetuatio fori principle – Transfer, during the proceedings, of the habitual residence of a child from a Member State of the European Union to a third State that is party to the 1996 Hague Convention.#Case C-572/21.cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22558Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#CC v VO.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility – Parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 8(1) and Article 61(a) – General jurisdiction – Perpetuatio fori principle – Transfer, during the proceedings, of the habitual residence of a child from a Member State of the European Union to a third State that is party to the 1996 Hague Convention.#Case C-572/21.cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22559Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#Romania v European Commission.#Appeal – Cohesion Fund and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – Co-financing rate applicable – Amendment of the rate between the submission of the final application for an interim payment and the acceptance of the accounts – Principle that accounts relate to a specific year and principle of non-retroactivity.#Case C-401/21 P.cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.
22560Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#Romania v European Commission.#Appeal – Cohesion Fund and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – Co-financing rate applicable – Amendment of the rate between the submission of the final application for an interim payment and the acceptance of the accounts – Principle that accounts relate to a specific year and principle of non-retroactivity.#Case C-401/21 P.cjeu_case · 14 июля 2022 г.