Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
2224

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 29 janvier 2026.#Eliz Erkut Duygu contre Fondazione Teatro alla Scala di Milano.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 1999/70/CE – Accord-cadre CES, UNICE et CEEP sur le travail à durée déterminée – Contrats de travail à durée déterminée dans le secteur des fondations lyriques et symphoniques – Travailleuse engagée sur le fondement de contrats à durée déterminée successifs – Clause 5 – Mesures visant à sanctionner le recours abusif aux contrats ou aux relations de travail à durée déterminée successifs – Réglementation nationale ne permettant pas une requalification du contrat de travail mais prévoyant notamment la réparation du préjudice subi.#Affaire C-668/24.

cjeu_case ·
2226

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 29 janvier 2026.#M.M. contre Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 1999/70/CE – Accord-cadre CES, UNICE et CEEP sur le travail à durée déterminée – Clause 4 – Principe de non-discrimination – Indemnité octroyée sous forme de carte électronique en vue de soutenir la formation continue des enseignants et d’améliorer leurs compétences professionnelles – Octroi réservé aux enseignants employés à durée indéterminée – Discrimination à l’égard des enseignants employés à durée déterminée – Jurisprudence nationale excluant l’octroi a posteriori de l’avantage en cause aux enseignants concernés lorsque ceux-ci ne font plus partie du système scolaire – Substitution, sous certaines conditions, d’un droit à réparation du préjudice subi.#Affaire C-654/24.

cjeu_case ·
2227

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#M.M. v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Allowance granted in the form of an electronic card to support the in-service training of teachers and enhance their professional skills – Grant reserved to teachers employed on a permanent basis – Discrimination against teachers employed on a fixed-term basis – National case-law precluding the retrospective grant of the benefit in question to the teachers concerned where they are no longer employed in the school system – Substitution, under certain conditions, of a right to compensation for the harm suffered.#Case C-654/24.

cjeu_case ·
2228

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Proceedings brought by S. H. d.o.o. and M. A. d.o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Mutual recognition of confiscation orders – Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA – Article 8(2)(d) – Reason for non-recognition or non-execution – Rights of interested parties – Bona fide third parties – Mortgage creditor – Immovable property constituting the proceeds of the offence – Procedure for recognition and execution of a confiscation order – Judgment mortgage registered before the adoption of that order.#Case C-562/24.

cjeu_case ·
2229

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Proceedings brought by S. H. d.o.o. and M. A. d.o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrožno sodišče v Kopru.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Mutual recognition of confiscation orders – Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA – Article 8(2)(d) – Reason for non-recognition or non-execution – Rights of interested parties – Bona fide third parties – Mortgage creditor – Immovable property constituting the proceeds of the offence – Procedure for recognition and execution of a confiscation order – Judgment mortgage registered before the adoption of that order.#Case C-562/24.

cjeu_case ·
2230

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 29 janvier 2026.#Deutsche Bank AG et BHW Bausparkasse AG contre Banque centrale européenne (BCE).#Pourvoi – Politique économique et monétaire – Surveillance prudentielle des établissements de crédit – Mécanisme de surveillance unique – Règlement (UE) no 1024/2013 – Missions spécifiques de surveillance confiées à la Banque centrale européenne (BCE) – Article 4 – Fixation des exigences prudentielles – Article 16 – Risque lié aux engagements de paiement irrévocables (EPI) souscrits en faveur des systèmes de garantie des dépôts et des fonds de résolution – Déduction intégrale des sommes versées en tant que garantie des EPI des fonds propres de base de catégorie 1 – Pouvoir discrétionnaire de la BCE – Contrôle juridictionnel.#Affaire C-556/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
2231

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Deutsche Bank AG and BHW Bausparkasse AG v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Single supervisory mechanism – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) – Article 4 – Setting of prudential requirements – Article 16 – Risk linked to irrevocable payment commitments (IPCs) given in favour of deposit guarantee schemes or resolution funds – Deduction in full from the Common Equity Tier 1 capital of the sums paid as collateral for the IPCs – Discretion of the ECB – Judicial review.#Case C-556/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
2232

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#W v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Article 23(1) – Access to the information in the file of an applicant for international protection – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Article 4, Article 18 and Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of non-refoulement – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to a fair trial – Investigation in the applicant’s country of origin – Rejection of an application for international protection and adoption of a return decision – Access of the court of first instance and the applicant to information relating to the manner in which the investigation was conducted in the applicant’s country of origin – Scope of the rights of the defence and of the right to an effective remedy – Connection with the principle of non-refoulement.#Case C-431/24.

cjeu_case ·
2233

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#W v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Article 23(1) – Access to the information in the file of an applicant for international protection – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4, Article 18 and Article 19(2) – Principle of non-refoulement – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Right to a fair trial – Investigation in the applicant’s country of origin – Rejection of an application for international protection and adoption of a return decision – Access of the court of first instance and the applicant to information relating to the manner in which the investigation was conducted in the applicant’s country of origin – Scope of the rights of the defence and of the right to an effective remedy – Connection with the principle of non-refoulement.#Case C-431/24.

cjeu_case ·
2234

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v M. GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Unfair competition – Unfair trading practices – Directive (EU) 2019/633 – Prohibition – Article 3(1)(d) – Payment request not related to the sale of the agricultural and food products of the supplier – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) – Power to impose fines – Classification as a ‘single infringement’ of a number of prohibited unfair trading practices giving rise to the imposition of a single fine – Principle ne bis in idem – National legislation providing for a cap on fines.#Case C-311/24.

cjeu_case ·
2235

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Steiermärkische Bank und Sparkassen AG and Others v Österreichische Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing – Directive (EU) 2015/849 – Penalties – Article 58 – Liability of legal persons – Article 59 – Attribution to a legal person of an infringement of its obligations committed by natural persons – Conditions – Article 60.#Case C-291/24.

cjeu_case ·
2236

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Steiermärkische Bank und Sparkassen AG and Others v Österreichische Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing – Directive (EU) 2015/849 – Penalties – Article 58 – Liability of legal persons – Article 59 – Attribution to a legal person of an infringement of its obligations committed by natural persons – Conditions – Article 60.#Case C-291/24.

cjeu_case ·
2237

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Meliá Hotels International, S.A. v Associação Ius Omnibus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Directive 2014/104/EU – Article 5(1) – Scope – Special declaratory action for the disclosure of documents preceding a potential action for damages – Assessment of the plausibility of the claim for damages.#Case C-286/24.

cjeu_case ·
2238

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Meliá Hotels International, S.A. v Associação Ius Omnibus.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Directive 2014/104/EU – Article 5(1) – Scope – Special declaratory action for the disclosure of documents preceding a potential action for damages – Assessment of the plausibility of the claim for damages.#Case C-286/24.

cjeu_case ·
2239

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#HF and WI v Anexartiti Archi Dimosion Esodon.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Importation of goods – Customs value – Undervaluation – Secondary methods for determining customs value – ‘Lowest acceptable price’ method calculated on the basis of aggregated statistical values established at EU level – Whether permissible.#Joined Cases C-72/24 and C-73/24.

cjeu_case ·
2240

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#HF and WI v Anexartiti Archi Dimosion Esodon.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Protodikeio Thessalonikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Importation of goods – Customs value – Undervaluation – Secondary methods for determining customs value – ‘Lowest acceptable price’ method calculated on the basis of aggregated statistical values established at EU level – Whether permissible.#Joined Cases C-72/24 and C-73/24.

cjeu_case ·