22081Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 8 September 2022.#J.K. v TP S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 3(1)(a) and (c) – Conditions for access to self-employment – Employment and working conditions – Prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation – Self-employed person working on the basis of a contract for specific work – Termination and non-renewal of contract – Freedom to choose a contracting party.#Case C-356/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22082Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 8 September 2022.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v B. and F, K. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#References for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Lodging of multiple applications for international protection in three Member States – Article 29 – Time limit for transfer – Expiry – Transfer of responsibility for examining the application – Article 27 – Remedy – Scope of judicial review – Possibility for the applicant to rely on the transfer of responsibility for examining the application.#Joined Cases C-323/21 to C-325/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22083Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 8 September 2022.#X v Udlændingenævnet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EEC-Turkey Association Agreement – Article 9 – Decision No 1/80 – Article 10(1) – Article 13 – Standstill clause – Family reunification – National rule introducing new more restrictive conditions in the area of family reunification for spouses of Turkish nationals who hold a permanent residence permit in the Member State concerned – Requirement that Turkish workers successfully take a test demonstrating a certain level of knowledge of the official language of that Member State – Justification – Objective of ensuring successful integration.#Case C-279/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22084Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 8 September 2022.#A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of movement for workers – Recognition of professional qualifications in a Member State – Directive 2005/36/EC – Right to exercise the profession of nursery school teacher – Regulated profession – Right of access to the profession on the basis of a diploma issued in the home Member State – Professional qualification obtained in a third country.#Case C-270/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22085Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 8 September 2022.#Pesticide Action Network Europe ASBL and Others v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (Belgium).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Placing of plant protection products on the market – Article 53(1) – Emergency situations in plant protection – Derogation – Scope – Seeds treated with plant protection products – Neonicotinoids – Active substances posing high risks to bees – Prohibition of the placing on the market and outside use of seeds treated with plant protection products containing those active substances – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/784 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/785 – Non-applicability of the derogation – Protection of human and animal health and the environment – Precautionary principle.#Case C-162/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22086Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 8 September 2022.#BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 77 to 79 – Remedies – Parallel exercise – Relationship – Procedural autonomy – Effectiveness of the protection rules established by that regulation – Consistent and homogeneous application of those rules throughout the European Union – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-132/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22087Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 8 September 2022.#PlasticsEurope v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).#Appeal – Establishment of a list of substances subject to authorisation – List of substances identified for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV – Updating of the entry of the substance bisphenol A as ‘a substance of very high concern’.#Case C-119/21 P.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22088Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 8 September 2022.#ZA and Others v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Vertical restrictions of competition – Article 101(1) and (2) TFEU – Principle of effectiveness – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 2 – Directive 2014/104/EU – Article 9(1) – Binding effect of the final decisions of the national competition authorities finding an infringement of the competition law rules – Temporal and material application – Actions for damages and for a declaration of nullity for infringements of the EU competition law provisions.#Case C-25/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22089Case C-507/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 — Puma SE and Others v European Commission (Appeal — Dumping — Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam — Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 — Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty — Competence ratione temporis — Principle of non-discrimination)cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22090Case C-399/21: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt — Sweden) — IRnova AB v FLIR Systems AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 24(4) — Exclusive jurisdiction — Jurisdiction over the registration or validity of patents — Scope — Patent application deposited and patent granted in a third State — Status of inventor — Proprietor of the right to an invention)cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22091Case C-368/21: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — R.T. v Hauptzollamt Hamburg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Union Customs Code — Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 — Place where the customs debt is incurred — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 30 — Article 60 — Article 71(1) — Chargeable event and place where the import VAT becomes chargeable — Place where the tax liability is incurred — Finding of a failure to comply with an obligation imposed by EU customs legislation — Determination of the place of importation of goods — Means of transport registered in a third country and imported into the European Union in infringement of customs legislation)cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22092Case C-263/21: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Asociación Multisectorial de Empresas de la Electrónica, las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación, de las Telecomunicaciones y de los Contenidos Digitales (AMETIC) v Administracíon del Estado and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Article 5(2)(b) — Exclusive reproduction right — Exception — Copies for private use — Levy — Ex ante exemption — Exemption certificate issued by a private law entity controlled solely by copyright management societies — Powers of review of that entity)cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22093Case C-98/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt R v W-GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 2(1), Article 9(1), Article 167 and Article 168(a) — Deduction of input tax — Definition of ‘taxable person’ — Holding company — Expenditure linked to a shareholder contribution in kind to its subsidiaries — No contribution of expenditure to the general costs — Subsidiaries’ activities largely tax-exempt)cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22094Joined Cases C-80/21 to C-82/21: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie — Poland) — E.K., S.K. v D.B.P. (C-80/21), and B.S., W.S. v M. (C-81/21), and B.S., Ł.S. v M. (C-82/21) (Request for a preliminary ruling — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) — Mortgage credit agreements — Effects of a finding that a term is unfair — Period of limitation — Principle of effectiveness)cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22095Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#RTL Television GmbH v Grupo Pestana S.G.P.S., S.A. and SALVOR - Sociedade de Investimento Hoteleiro, S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Copyright and related rights – Satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission – Directive 93/83/EEC – Article 1(3) – Concept of ‘cable retransmission’ – Provider of the retransmission not having the status of a cable operator – Simultaneous, unaltered and unabridged distribution of television and radio programmes broadcast by satellite and intended for reception by the public, performed by the operator of a hotel establishment, by means of a satellite dish, a cable and television or radio sets – None.#Case C-716/20.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22096Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#RTL Television GmbH v Grupo Pestana S.G.P.S., S.A. and SALVOR - Sociedade de Investimento Hoteleiro, S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Copyright and related rights – Satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission – Directive 93/83/EEC – Article 1(3) – Concept of ‘cable retransmission’ – Provider of the retransmission not having the status of a cable operator – Simultaneous, unaltered and unabridged distribution of television and radio programmes broadcast by satellite and intended for reception by the public, performed by the operator of a hotel establishment, by means of a satellite dish, a cable and television or radio sets – None.#Case C-716/20.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22097Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#ET v Ministerstvo životního prostředí.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein – Regulation (EC) No 338/97 – Article 8(3)(d) – Concept of ‘specimens of animal species that are born and bred in captivity’ – Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 – Article 1(3) – Concept of ‘breeding stock’ – Article 54(2) – Establishment of the breeding stock – Controlled ancestry.#Case C-659/20.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22098Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#ET v Ministerstvo životního prostředí.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein – Regulation (EC) No 338/97 – Article 8(3)(d) – Concept of ‘specimens of animal species that are born and bred in captivity’ – Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 – Article 1(3) – Concept of ‘breeding stock’ – Article 54(2) – Establishment of the breeding stock – Controlled ancestry.#Case C-659/20.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22099Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#Lux Express Estonia AS v Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Imposition by means of general rules of an obligation to carry certain categories of passenger free of charge – Obligation for the competent authority to grant public service compensation to operators – Calculation method.#Case C-614/20.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22100Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#Lux Express Estonia AS v Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Halduskohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Imposition by means of general rules of an obligation to carry certain categories of passenger free of charge – Obligation for the competent authority to grant public service compensation to operators – Calculation method.#Case C-614/20.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.