Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
2188

Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 3 février 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#« Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande d’admission ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non‑admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-620/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
2189

Order of the Court of 3 February 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-620/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
2190

Order of the Court of 3 February 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-619/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
2191

Order of the Court of 3 February 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-619/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
2192

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2026.#Regione Umbria v Ge.Fi.L. - Gestione Fiscalità Locale SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12(4) – Award of a contract to a non-economic public entity without a call for tenders – Exemption relating to contracts concerning cooperation between public entities – Contract entrusting a non-economic public entity with the management of motor vehicle tax registers.#Case C-316/25.

cjeu_case ·
2194

Case C-316/25, Regione Umbria: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Regione Umbria v Ge.Fi.L. – Gestione Fiscalità Locale SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12(4) – Award of a contract to a non-economic public entity without a call for tenders – Exemption relating to contracts concerning cooperation between public entities – Contract entrusting a non-economic public entity with the management of motor vehicle tax registers)

cjeu_case ·