Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
2165

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Médis - Companhia portuguesa de seguros de saúde, S. A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark WelMedis – Earlier international registration in respect of the figurative mark médis – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-142/25.

cjeu_case ·
2166

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Médis - Companhia portuguesa de seguros de saúde, S. A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark WelMedis – Earlier international registration in respect of the figurative mark médis – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-142/25.

cjeu_case ·
2174

Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 4 février 2026.#Radical-Consulting UG e.a. contre entreprise commune pour le calcul à haute performance européen.#Recherche et développement technologique – Programme-cadre pour la recherche et l’innovation ‟Horizon Europe” (2021-2027) – Domaine des applications de calcul à haute performance – Appel à propositions en vue de l’octroi d’une subvention – Décision refusant une proposition – Décision rejetant la demande de révision de l’évaluation – Recours en annulation – Qualité pour agir – Intérêt à agir – Recevabilité – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Obligation de motivation – Principe de transparence – Égalité de traitement – Article 30 du règlement (UE) 2021/695.#Affaire T-328/23.

cjeu_case ·
2175

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Radical-Consulting UG and Others v European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking.#Research and technological development – Horizon Europe Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – High-performance computing applications – Call for proposals with a view to the award of a grant – Decision rejecting a proposal – Decision rejecting the request for an evaluation review – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of transparency – Equal treatment – Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2021/695.#Case T-328/23.

cjeu_case ·
2176

Case T-328/23: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2026 – Radical-Consulting and Others v EuroHPC (Research and technological development – Horizon Europe Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – High-performance computing applications – Call for proposals with a view to the award of a grant – Decision rejecting a proposal – Decision rejecting the request for an evaluation review – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of transparency – Equal treatment – Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2021/695)

cjeu_case ·
2178

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Commission.#Energy – European platforms for the exchange of standard products for balancing energy – Switzerland’s participation – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – Letter from the Commission refusing to authorise the Swiss transmission system operator to participate in the platforms – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Continuing interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility – Lack of competence of the author of the act.#Case T-127/21 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
2179

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Commission.#Energy – European platforms for the exchange of standard products for balancing energy – Switzerland’s participation – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – Letter from the Commission refusing to authorise the Swiss transmission system operator to participate in the platforms – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Continuing interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility – Lack of competence of the author of the act.#Case T-127/21 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
2180

Case T-127/21 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2026 – Swissgrid v Commission (Energy – European platforms for the exchange of standard products for balancing energy – Switzerland’s participation – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – Letter from the Commission refusing to authorise the Swiss transmission system operator to participate in the platforms – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Continuing interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility – Lack of competence of the author of the act)

cjeu_case ·