Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
21303

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#A Oy v B Ky and Joint heirs of C.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Directive 2011/7/EU – Article 12(4) – Temporal scope – Practice established before 16 March 2013 consisting in not recovering interest for late payment or compensation for recovery costs – Practice applied to individual orders placed on or after that date – Article 7(2) and (3) – Grossly unfair contractual terms and practices – Waiver freely agreed to.#Case C-406/21.

cjeu_case ·
21304

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#A Oy v B Ky and Joint heirs of C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Directive 2011/7/EU – Article 12(4) – Temporal scope – Practice established before 16 March 2013 consisting in not recovering interest for late payment or compensation for recovery costs – Practice applied to individual orders placed on or after that date – Article 7(2) and (3) – Grossly unfair contractual terms and practices – Waiver freely agreed to.#Case C-406/21.

cjeu_case ·
21305

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#EKOFRUKT v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ – Veliko Tarnovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 – Article 3(12) – Concept of ‘qualified electronic signature’ – Article 25(1) – Article 26 – Annex I – Legal effects of electronic signatures – Requirements relating to an advanced electronic signature – Administrative act issued in the form of an electronic document signed with an electronic signature not meeting the requirements for a ‘qualified electronic signature’ – Cumulative requirements – Consequences – Article 3(15) – Absence of a ‘qualified certificate for electronic signature’ – Entry of a qualified electronic signature in the certificate issued by the trust service provider – Effect – Names of the holder of the electronic signature which have been transliterated using Latin script rather than being written in Cyrillic script as they normally are.#Case C-362/21.

cjeu_case ·
21306

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#EKOFRUKT v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ – Veliko Tarnovo.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 – Article 3(12) – Concept of ‘qualified electronic signature’ – Article 25(1) – Article 26 – Annex I – Legal effects of electronic signatures – Requirements relating to an advanced electronic signature – Administrative act issued in the form of an electronic document signed with an electronic signature not meeting the requirements for a ‘qualified electronic signature’ – Cumulative requirements – Consequences – Article 3(15) – Absence of a ‘qualified certificate for electronic signature’ – Entry of a qualified electronic signature in the certificate issued by the trust service provider – Effect – Names of the holder of the electronic signature which have been transliterated using Latin script rather than being written in Cyrillic script as they normally are.#Case C-362/21.

cjeu_case ·
21307

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Komisia za zashtita na lichnite danni and Tsentralna izbiratelna komisia v Koalitsia „Demokratichna Bulgaria - Obedinenie“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Scope – Article 2(2)(a) – Concept of ‘activity which falls outside the scope of Union law’ – National and European elections – Article 6(1)(e) – Lawfulness of processing – Article 58 – Measure adopted by the supervisory authorities which limits or, where appropriate, prohibits the video recording of the vote count at polling stations.#Case C-306/21.

cjeu_case ·
21308

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Komisia za zashtita na lichnite danni and Tsentralna izbiratelna komisia v Koalitsia „Demokratichna Bulgaria - Obedinenie“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Scope – Article 2(2)(a) – Concept of ‘activity which falls outside the scope of Union law’ – National and European elections – Article 6(1)(e) – Lawfulness of processing – Article 58 – Measure adopted by the supervisory authorities which limits or, where appropriate, prohibits the video recording of the vote count at polling stations.#Case C-306/21.

cjeu_case ·
21309

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia and Others v YF and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 2(1) and (2) – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – National legislation which leads to a situation in which the remuneration of certain judges is higher than that of other judges of the same rank and performing the same work – Article 1 – Purpose – Exhaustive nature of the discrimination referred to.#Case C-301/21.

cjeu_case ·
21310

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia and Others v YF and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Oradea.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 2(1) and (2) – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – National legislation which leads to a situation in which the remuneration of certain judges is higher than that of other judges of the same rank and performing the same work – Article 1 – Purpose – Exhaustive nature of the discrimination referred to.#Case C-301/21.

cjeu_case ·
21311

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Allianz Benelux SA v État belge, SPF Finances.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Directive 90/435/EEC – Article 4(1) – Exemption in favour of a parent company of the dividends paid by its subsidiary – Carrying over definitively taxed income surpluses to subsequent tax years – Absorption of a company with definitively taxed income surpluses by another company – National legislation limiting the transfer of those surpluses to the absorbing company.#Case C-295/21.

cjeu_case ·
21312

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Allianz Benelux SA v État belge, SPF Finances.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Directive 90/435/EEC – Article 4(1) – Exemption in favour of a parent company of the dividends paid by its subsidiary – Carrying over definitively taxed income surpluses to subsequent tax years – Absorption of a company with definitively taxed income surpluses by another company – National legislation limiting the transfer of those surpluses to the absorbing company.#Case C-295/21.

cjeu_case ·
21314

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#BT v Laudamotion GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Montreal Convention – Article 17(1) – Liability of air carriers for death or bodily injuries sustained by passengers – Concept of ‘bodily injury’ – Post-traumatic stress disorder suffered by a passenger during the emergency evacuation of an aircraft.#Case C-111/21.

cjeu_case ·
21315

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(b) and (e) – Principle of ‘purpose limitation’ – Principle of ‘storage limitation’ – Creation, from an existing database, of a database to carry out tests and correct errors – Further processing of the data – Compatibility of the further processing of those data with the purposes of the initial collection – Retention period in the light of those purposes.#Case C-77/21.

cjeu_case ·
21316

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(b) and (e) – Principle of ‘purpose limitation’ – Principle of ‘storage limitation’ – Creation, from an existing database, of a database to carry out tests and correct errors – Further processing of the data – Compatibility of the further processing of those data with the purposes of the initial collection – Retention period in the light of those purposes.#Case C-77/21.

cjeu_case ·
21317

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#O.T. E. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Residence permit issued to third-country nationals who are victims of trafficking in human beings or who have been the subject of an action to facilitate illegal immigration, who cooperate with the competent authorities – Directive 2004/81/EC – Article 6 – Scope – Third-country national claiming to be the victim of an offence related to the trafficking in human beings – Entitlement to the reflection period provided for in Article 6(1) of that directive – Prohibition on enforcing an expulsion measure – Definition – Scope – Calculation of that reflection period – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person – Transfer to the Member State responsible for examining that application for international protection.#Case C-66/21.

cjeu_case ·
21318

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#O.T. E. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Residence permit issued to third-country nationals who are victims of trafficking in human beings or who have been the subject of an action to facilitate illegal immigration, who cooperate with the competent authorities – Directive 2004/81/EC – Article 6 – Scope – Third-country national claiming to be the victim of an offence related to the trafficking in human beings – Entitlement to the reflection period provided for in Article 6(1) of that directive – Prohibition on enforcing an expulsion measure – Definition – Scope – Calculation of that reflection period – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person – Transfer to the Member State responsible for examining that application for international protection.#Case C-66/21.

cjeu_case ·
21320

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 20 October 2022.#Dual Prod SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca - Comisia regională pentru autorizarea operatorilor de produse supuse accizelor armonizate.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Satu Mare.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Paragraph 16(1) – Authorisation to operate as a tax warehouse for products subject to excise duty – Successive suspension measures – Whether criminal in nature – Articles 48 and 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of the presumption of innocence – Principle ne bis in idem – Proportionality.#Case C-412/21.

cjeu_case ·