Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
21083

Case C-243/22: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 November 2022 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Lecce — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Scope — Article 49 — Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties — Exclusion of the criminal liability of the infringement on account of its lack of a particularly serious nature — National case-law prohibiting the application of a national rule before the Magistrate — Lack of connection to EU law — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

cjeu_case ·
21086

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 November 2022.#Groupement des cartes bancaires (CB) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CCB – Earlier EU figurative mark CB – Earlier international registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark CB – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Reputation and enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-639/21.

cjeu_case ·
21087

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 November 2022.#Groupement des cartes bancaires (CB) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CCB – Earlier EU figurative mark CB – Earlier international registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark CB – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Reputation and enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-639/21.

cjeu_case ·
21090

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 November 2022.#WP and Others v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Pensions – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the EU – Transfer to the EU scheme – Additional years of pensionable service – Application for restitution of the amount of transferred national pension rights – Dismissal of application – ‘Minimum subsistence figure’ rule – Undue enrichment – Equal treatment.#Case T-604/21.

cjeu_case ·
21091

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 November 2022.#WP and Others v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Pensions – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the EU – Transfer to the EU scheme – Additional years of pensionable service – Application for restitution of the amount of transferred national pension rights – Dismissal of application – ‘Minimum subsistence figure’ rule – Undue enrichment – Equal treatment.#Case T-604/21.

cjeu_case ·
21092

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 November 2022.#Pharmadom v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark WELLMONDE – Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-601/21.

cjeu_case ·
21093

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 November 2022.#Pharmadom v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark WELLMONDE – Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-601/21.

cjeu_case ·
21094

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 November 2022.#Société Elmar Wolf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a head – Earlier national figurative mark representing the head of a canine – Earlier international registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing the head of a canine – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion.#Case T-596/21.

cjeu_case ·
21095

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 November 2022.#Société Elmar Wolf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a head – Earlier national figurative mark representing the head of a canine – Earlier international registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing the head of a canine – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion.#Case T-596/21.

cjeu_case ·
21098

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 November 2022.#Citizens' Committee of the European Citizens' Initiative 'Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe' v European Commission.#Law governing the institutions – European citizens’ initiative – ‘Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ – Commission communication setting out the reasons for not adopting the proposals for legal acts contained in the European citizens’ initiative – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-158/21.

cjeu_case ·
21099

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 November 2022.#Citizens' Committee of the European Citizens' Initiative 'Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe' v European Commission.#Law governing the institutions – European citizens’ initiative – ‘Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe’ – Commission communication setting out the reasons for not adopting the proposals for legal acts contained in the European citizens’ initiative – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-158/21.

cjeu_case ·
21100

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 November 2022.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Croatian air transport market – Aid granted by Croatia to an airline in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Direct grant – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Individual concern – Admissibility – Serious difficulties – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Equal treatment – Freedom of establishment – Free provision of services – Assessment of the damage – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-111/21.

cjeu_case ·