Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
20981

Case C-260/21, Corporate Commercial Bank: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad — Vidin — Bulgaria) — Corporate Commercial Bank, in liquidation v Elit Petrol AD (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Articles 94 and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insolvency proceedings — Mutual set-offs with an insolvent credit institution — Retroactive amendment to the conditions for the enforcement of those set-offs — National legislation declared unconstitutional — Purely internal situation — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
20982

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 November 2022.#Senatsverwaltung für Inneres und Sport, Standesamtsaufsicht v TB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility – Divorce – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 2(4) and Article 21 – Concept of ‘judgment’ – Recognition, in a Member State, of the dissolution of a marriage agreed in an agreement between spouses and pronounced by a civil registrar of another Member State – Criterion for determining the existence of a ‘judgment’.#Case C-646/20.

cjeu_case ·
20983

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 November 2022.#Senatsverwaltung für Inneres und Sport, Standesamtsaufsicht v TB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility – Divorce – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 2(4) and Article 21 – Concept of ‘judgment’ – Recognition, in a Member State, of the dissolution of a marriage agreed in an agreement between spouses and pronounced by a civil registrar of another Member State – Criterion for determining the existence of a ‘judgment’.#Case C-646/20.

cjeu_case ·
20984

Case C-646/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Senatsverwaltung für Inneres und Sport, Standesamtsaufsicht v TB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility — Divorce — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 2(4) and Article 21 — Concept of ‘judgment’ — Recognition, in a Member State, of the dissolution of a marriage agreed in an agreement between spouses and pronounced by a civil registrar of another Member State — Criterion for determining the existence of a ‘judgment’)

cjeu_case ·
20997

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 November 2022.#Gencoal SA v Conceito Norte – Consultadoria de Gestão, Lda and BT.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Absence of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-669/21.

cjeu_case ·
20998

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 November 2022.#Gencoal SA v Conceito Norte – Consultadoria de Gestão, Lda and BT.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto - Juízo Central Cível da Póvoa de Varzim.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Absence of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-669/21.

cjeu_case ·
21000

Case C-669/21, Gencoal: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto — Juízo Central Cível da Póvoa de Varzim — Portugal) — Gencoal S.A. v Conceito Norte — Consultadoria de Gestão, Lda., BT (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling — Absence of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·