2081Order of the Court of 10 February 2026.#Princesse de Paris v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-694/25 P.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.
2082Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d'admission des pourvois) du 10 février 2026.#Princesse de Paris SARL contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande d’admission ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non‑admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-694/25 P.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.
2083Case T-71/24: Order of the General Court of 10 February 2026 – Banque Postale v ECBcjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.
2084Case T-70/24: Order of the General Court of 10 February 2026 – Société générale v ECBcjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.
2085Case T-65/24: Order of the General Court of 10 February 2026 – Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v ECBcjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.
2086Case T-64/24: Order of the General Court of 10 February 2026 – BPCE and Others v ECBcjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.
2087Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 February 2026.#WhatsApp Ireland Ltd v European Data Protection Board.#Appeal – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 63 – Consistency mechanism – Article 65 – Dispute resolution by the European Data Protection Board – Binding decision – Action for annulment – First paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Act open to challenge – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Condition that the measure against which the action has been brought must be of direct concern to the applicant.#Case C-97/23 P.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.
2088Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 February 2026.#WhatsApp Ireland Ltd v European Data Protection Board.#Appeal – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 63 – Consistency mechanism – Article 65 – Dispute resolution by the European Data Protection Board – Binding decision – Action for annulment – First paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Act open to challenge – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Condition that the measure against which the action has been brought must be of direct concern to the applicant.#Case C-97/23 P.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.
2089Case C-97/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 February 2026 – WhatsApp Ireland v European Data Protection Board (Appeal – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 63 – Consistency mechanism – Article 65 – Dispute resolution by the European Data Protection Board – Binding decision – Action for annulment – First paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Act open to challenge – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Condition that the measure against which the action has been brought must be of direct concern to the applicant)cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.
2091Case T-93/26: Action brought on 9 February 2026 – Iberfruta-Muerza v EUIPO – Compagnie financière et d’investissement delaval labosanté (France BéBé)cjeu_case · 9 февраля 2026 г.
2092Case T-92/26: Action brought on 9 February 2026 – Zalando v Commissioncjeu_case · 9 февраля 2026 г.
2093Case T-91/26: Action brought on 9 February 2026 – Amazon EU v Commissioncjeu_case · 9 февраля 2026 г.
2094Case T-86/26: Action brought on 9 February 2026 – Abacco’s v EUIPO – Restaurant Abac (ABACCO’S STEAKHOUSE)cjeu_case · 9 февраля 2026 г.
2095Case C-71/26, D&G: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Opolu (Poland) lodged on 9 February 2026 – D&G Sp. z o.o. v Sopockie Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń ERGO HESTIA S.A.cjeu_case · 9 февраля 2026 г.
2096Case C-70/26, Nicoventures Trading and House of Prince: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 9 February 2026 – Nicoventures Trading Ltd, House of Prince A/S v Sikkerhedsstyrelsencjeu_case · 9 февраля 2026 г.
2097Case C-68/26, Kilyanov: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 9 February 2026 – criminal proceedings against DKcjeu_case · 9 февраля 2026 г.
2098Ordonnance du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 9 février 2026.#Leidos, Inc. e.a. contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation – Rapprochement des législations – Spectre radioélectrique harmonisé – Absence de qualité pour agir – Défaut d’affectation directe – Acte non susceptible de recours – Acte préparatoire – Irrecevabilité – Demande d’injonction – Incompétence.#Affaire T-260/25.cjeu_case · 9 февраля 2026 г.
2099Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 February 2026.#Leidos, Inc. and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Approximation of laws – Harmonised radio spectrum – No locus standi – Lack of direct concern – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Application for an order – Lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-260/25.cjeu_case · 9 февраля 2026 г.
2100Case T-282/25: Order of the General Court of 9 February 2026 – FOP v Commission (Environment – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Request by a Member State for verification of the sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria – Article 30(10) of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 – Action for failure to act – Adoption during the proceedings of the act whose absence constitutes the subject matter of the proceedings – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 9 февраля 2026 г.