20941Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#Novartis Pharma GmbH v Abacus Medicine A/S.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – EU trade mark – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 9(2) – Rights conferred by a mark – Article 15 – Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark – Parallel import of medicinal products – Repackaging of the product bearing the mark – New outer packaging – Opposition by the proprietor of the mark – Artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 47a – Safety features – Replacement – Equivalent features – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 – Article 3(2) – Anti-tampering device – Unique identifier.#Case C-147/20.cjeu_case · 17 ноября 2022 г.
20942Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#Novartis Pharma GmbH v Abacus Medicine A/S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – EU trade mark – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 9(2) – Rights conferred by a mark – Article 15 – Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark – Parallel import of medicinal products – Repackaging of the product bearing the mark – New outer packaging – Opposition by the proprietor of the mark – Artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 47a – Safety features – Replacement – Equivalent features – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 – Article 3(2) – Anti-tampering device – Unique identifier.#Case C-147/20.cjeu_case · 17 ноября 2022 г.
20943Case C-607/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — GE Aircraft Engine Services Ltd v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 26(1)(b) — Supply of services free of charge — Award of retail vouchers free of charge to staff of the taxable person’s business as part of an employee recognition and reward scheme — Transactions treated as supplies of services for consideration — Scope — Principle of fiscal neutrality)cjeu_case · 17 ноября 2022 г.
20944Case C-562/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa — Latvia) — SIA ‘Rodl & Partner’ v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing — Directive (EU) 2015/849 — Article 18(1) and (3) — Point 3(b) of Annex III — Risk-based approach — Risk assessment carried out by obliged entities — Identification of risks by Member States and obliged entities — Customer due diligence measures — Enhanced due diligence measures — High-corruption-risk third countries — Article 13(1)(c) and (d) — Evidence and documentation requirements for obliged entities — Article 14(5) — Ongoing monitoring of customers by obliged entities — Publication of decisions imposing a sanction)cjeu_case · 17 ноября 2022 г.
20945Joined Cases C-331/20 P and C-343/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 November 2022 — Volotea SA (C-331/20 P), easyJet Airline Co. Ltd (C-343/20 P) v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Article 107(1) TFEU — European Commission decision on compensation to Sardinian airports for public service obligations — Existence of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market, granted by the Italian Republic to airlines through airport operators — Concept of ‘State aid’ — Proof of the existence of an advantage — Determination of the amount — Market economy operator principle — Applicability and application — Test of the private acquirer of goods or services — Conditions — Burden of proof)cjeu_case · 17 ноября 2022 г.
20946Joined Cases C-253/20 and C-254/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel — Belgium) — Impexeco NV v Novartis AG (C-253/20), PI Pharma NV v Novartis AG, Novartis Pharma NV (C-254/20) (References for a preliminary ruling — Articles 34 and 36 TFEU — Free movement of goods — Intellectual property — Trade marks — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 9(2) — Article 13 — Directive 2008/95 — Article 5(1) — Article 7 — Rights conferred by a trade mark — Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark — Parallel imports of medicinal products — Reference medicinal product and generic medicinal product — Economically linked undertakings — Repackaging of the generic medicinal product — New outer packaging — Affixing the trade mark of the reference medicinal product — Opposition by the proprietor of the trade mark — Artificial partitioning of the markets between the Member States)cjeu_case · 17 ноября 2022 г.
20947Case C-224/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sø- og Handelsretten — Denmark) — Merck Sharp & Dohme BV, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., MSD Danmark ApS v Abacus Medicine A/S, and Novartis AG v Abacus Medicine A/S, and Novartis AG v Abacus Medicine A/S, and Novartis AG v Paranova Danmark A/S, and H. Lundbeck A/S v Paranova Danmark A/S, and MSD Danmark ApS, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v 2CARE4 ApS, and Ferring Lægemidler A/S v Paranova Danmark A/S (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 34 and 36 TFEU — Free movement of goods — Intellectual property — Trade marks — Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — EU trade mark — Article 9(2) — Article 15 — Directive (EU) 2015/2436 — Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks — Article 10(2) — Article 15 — Rights conferred by a trade mark — Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark — Parallel import of medicinal products — Repackaging of the product bearing the mark — New outer packaging — Replacement of the trade mark appearing on the original outer packaging by another product name — Reaffixing of the trade mark of the proprietor specific to the product, to the exclusion of the other distinctive marks or signs appearing on that original outer packaging — Opposition by the proprietor of the mark — Artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Article 47a — Safety features — Replacement — Equivalent features — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 — Article 3(2) — Anti-tampering device)cjeu_case · 17 ноября 2022 г.
20948Case C-204/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH v kohlpharma GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Trade marks — Directive (EU) 2015/2436 — Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks — Article 10(2) — Rights conferred by a trade mark — Article 15 — Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark — Parallel import of medicinal products — Repackaging of the product bearing the mark — New outer packaging — Opposition by the proprietor of the mark — Artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Article 47a — Safety features — Replacement — Equivalent features — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 — Article 3(2) — Anti-tampering device — Unique identifier)cjeu_case · 17 ноября 2022 г.
20949Case C-147/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Novartis Pharma GmbH v Abacus Medicine A/S (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — EU trade mark — Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 9(2) — Rights conferred by a mark — Article 15 — Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark — Parallel import of medicinal products — Repackaging of the product bearing the mark — New outer packaging — Opposition by the proprietor of the mark — Artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Article 47a — Safety features — Replacement — Equivalent features — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 — Article 3(2) — Anti-tampering device — Unique identifier)cjeu_case · 17 ноября 2022 г.
20950Case T-706/22: Action brought on 16 November 2022 — Nicoventures Trading and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 16 ноября 2022 г.
20951Order of the Court (Chambre determining whether appeals should proceed) of 16 November 2022.#European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Nowhere Co. Ltd.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals may proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-337/22 P.cjeu_case · 16 ноября 2022 г.
20952Order of the Court of 16 November 2022.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Nowhere Co. Ltd.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals may proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-337/22 P.cjeu_case · 16 ноября 2022 г.
20953Case C-708/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 16 November 2022 — Asociación Española de Productores de Vacuno de Carne — ASOPROVAC v Administración General del Estadocjeu_case · 16 ноября 2022 г.
20954Case C-705/22 P: Appeal brought on 16 November 2022 by the European Investment Bank against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 7 September 2022 in Case T-751/20, KL v EIBcjeu_case · 16 ноября 2022 г.
20955Case C-704/22 P: Appeal brought on 16 November 2022 by the European Investment Bank against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 7 September 2022 in Case T-651/20, KL v EIBcjeu_case · 16 ноября 2022 г.
20956Case C-703/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 16 November 2022 — WU v Directie van het Centraal Bureau Rijvaardigheidsbewijzen (CBR)cjeu_case · 16 ноября 2022 г.
20957Case C-202/22, TAP — Transportes Aéreos Portugueses: Order of the President of the Court of 16 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto Juízo Local Cível da Maia — Portugal) — WH, NX v TAP — Transportes Aéreos Portugueses, SGPS, SAcjeu_case · 16 ноября 2022 г.
20958Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 November 2022.#Grupo Eig Multimedia, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark FORO16 – Earlier EU figurative and word marks Cambio16, Energia16, Cambio16 radio – Earlier national figurative and word marks Camb16, DEFENSA Y SEGURIDAD 16, CAMBIO16 DIGITAL, EVENTOS 16, Salón16 – Relative ground for refusal – Family of marks – No evidence – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-796/21.cjeu_case · 16 ноября 2022 г.
20959Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 November 2022.#Grupo Eig Multimedia, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark FORO16 – Earlier EU figurative and word marks Cambio16, Energia16, Cambio16 radio – Earlier national figurative and word marks Camb16, DEFENSA Y SEGURIDAD 16, CAMBIO16 DIGITAL, EVENTOS 16, Salón16 – Relative ground for refusal – Family of marks – No evidence – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-796/21.cjeu_case · 16 ноября 2022 г.
20960Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 November 2022.#Epsilon Data Management LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark EPSILON TECHNOLOGIES – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of the use – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character – Use in connection with the services in respect of which the mark was registered.#Case T-512/21.cjeu_case · 16 ноября 2022 г.