Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

2061

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Neuraxpharm Pharmaceuticals SL v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Revocation of the marketing authorisation for Dimethyl Fumarate Neuraxpharm – dimethyl fumarate, a medicinal product for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Article 266 TFEU.#Case T-1182/23.

cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2026 г.

2062

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Mylan Ireland Ltd v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Revocation of the marketing authorisation for Dimethyl Fumarate Mylan – dimethyl fumarate, a medicinal product for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Article 266 TFEU.#Case T-1181/23.

cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2026 г.

2063

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Mylan Ireland Ltd v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Revocation of the marketing authorisation for Dimethyl Fumarate Mylan – dimethyl fumarate, a medicinal product for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Article 266 TFEU.#Case T-1181/23.

cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2026 г.

2064

Case T-1183/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 February 2026 – Zakłady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma v Commission (Medicinal products for human use – Revocation of the marketing authorisation for Dimethyl Fumarate Polpharma – dimethyl fumarate, a medicinal product for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Article 266 TFEU)

cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2026 г.

2065

Case T-1182/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 February 2026 – Neuraxpharm Pharmaceuticals v European Commission (Medicinal products for human use – Revocation of the marketing authorisation for Dimethyl Fumarate Neuraxpharm – dimethyl fumarate, a medicinal product for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Article 266 TFEU)

cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2026 г.

2066

Case T-1181/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 February 2026 – Mylan Ireland Ltd v European Commission (Medicinal products for human use – Revocation of the marketing authorisation for Dimethyl Fumarate Mylan – dimethyl fumarate, a medicinal product for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Article 266 TFEU)

cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2026 г.

2067

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Ivan Fursin and Others v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-145/21.

cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2026 г.

2068

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Ivan Fursin and Others v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-145/21.

cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2026 г.

2069

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Trasta Komercbanka AS v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-135/21.

cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2026 г.

2070

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Trasta Komercbanka AS v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-135/21.

cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2026 г.

2071

Case T-145/21: Order of the General Court of 11 February 2026 – Fursin and Others v ECB (Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2026 г.

2072

Case T-135/21: Order of the General Court of 11 February 2026 – Trasta Komercbanka v ECB (Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2026 г.

2073

Case T-100/26: Action brought on 10 February 2026 – Euro Games Technology v EUIPO – Zamia (Big Bass Halloween)

cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.

2074

Case T-99/26: Action brought on 10 February 2026 – Vinaria Bostovan v EUIPO – Platinum Wines (MOŁDAWSKA WINNICA)

cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.

2075

Case T-98/26: Action brought on 10 February 2026 – Vinaria Bostovan v EUIPO – Platinum Wines (MOLDAWSKA WINNICA)

cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.

2076

Case T-94/26: Action brought on 10 February 2026 – Teofarma v EUIPO – Cosmetic Research Group (SOSKIN)

cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.

2077

Case C-72/26, Arriva Italia and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 10 February 2026 – Arriva Italia Srl and Others v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Associazione Nazionale Autotrasporto Viaggiatori (ANAV)

cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.

2078

Ordonnance du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 10 février 2026.#IR contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Procédure disciplinaire – Sanction disciplinaire – Rétrogradation dans le même groupe de fonctions – Exercice non autorisé d’activités extérieures – Article 10 de l’annexe IX du statut – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Proportionnalité – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-214/25.

cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.

2079

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2026.#IR v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Downgrading in the same function group – Unauthorised engagement in outside activities – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-214/25.

cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.

2080

Case T-214/25: Order of the General Court of 10 February 2026 – IR v Council (Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Downgrading in the same function group – Unauthorised engagement in outside activities – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2026 г.