20361Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 December 2022.#CM v TimePartner Personalmanagement GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Employment and social policy – Temporary agency work – Directive 2008/104/EC – Article 5 – Principle of equal treatment – Need to respect, in the event of derogation from that principle, the overall protection of temporary agency workers – Collective agreement providing for lower pay than that of staff recruited directly by the user undertaking – Effective judicial protection – Judicial review.#Case C-311/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20362Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 December 2022.#CM v TimePartner Personalmanagement GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Employment and social policy – Temporary agency work – Directive 2008/104/EC – Article 5 – Principle of equal treatment – Need to respect, in the event of derogation from that principle, the overall protection of temporary agency workers – Collective agreement providing for lower pay than that of staff recruited directly by the user undertaking – Effective judicial protection – Judicial review.#Case C-311/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20363Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 December 2022.#Regionų apygardos administracinio teismo Kauno rūmai v Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) – Decision 2007/533/JHA – Alert on an object sought – Article 38 – Objectives of the alert – Seizure or use as evidence in criminal proceedings – Article 39 – Execution of the action based on an alert – Measures taken in accordance with the national law of the Member States – National legislation laying down an obligation to prohibit the registration of vehicles which are the subject of alerts in SIS II.#Case C-88/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20364Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 December 2022.#Regionų apygardos administracinio teismo Kauno rūmai v Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) – Decision 2007/533/JHA – Alert on an object sought – Article 38 – Objectives of the alert – Seizure or use as evidence in criminal proceedings – Article 39 – Execution of the action based on an alert – Measures taken in accordance with the national law of the Member States – National legislation laying down an obligation to prohibit the registration of vehicles which are the subject of alerts in SIS II.#Case C-88/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20365Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 15 December 2022.#UAB 'Brink's Lithuania' v Lietuvos bankas.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the euro against counterfeiting – Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 – Article 6(1) – Payment service providers engaged in the processing of banknotes and their distribution to the public – Decision ECB/2010/14 – Article 6(2) – Detection of unfit euro banknotes – Automated fitness checking of banknotes – Minimum standards published on the website of the European Central Bank (ECB) and amended from time to time – Personal scope – Extent of cash handlers’ obligations – Binding force – Principle of legal certainty.#Case C-772/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20366Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 15 December 2022.#O. G. v Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte costituzionale.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Grounds for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Article 4(6) – Objective of social rehabilitation – Third-country nationals staying or residing on the territory of the executing Member State – Equal treatment – Article 20 in the Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-700/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20367Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 15 December 2022.#AR and Others v PK SA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103/EC – Article 3 – Compulsory insurance of vehicles – Article 18 – Direct right of action – Scope – Determination of the amount of compensation – Hypothetical costs – Possibility of making the payment of compensation subject to certain conditions – Sale of the vehicle.#Case C-618/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20368Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 15 December 2022.#Proceedings brought by J.M.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Itä-Suomen hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 4 and 15 – Scope of the right of access to information referred to in Article 15 – Information contained in log data – Article 4 – Definition of ‘personal data’ – Definition of ‘recipients’ – Temporal application.#Case C-579/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20369Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 15 December 2022.#I.S. and K.S. v YYY. S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Dual-purpose contract – Article 2(b) – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Criteria.#Case C-570/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20370Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 15 December 2022.#Azienda Nazionale Autonoma Strade SpA (ANAS) v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Union Structural Funds – Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 – Article 2(7) – Concept of ‘irregularity’ – Article 98(1) and (2) – Financial corrections by Member States in connection with irregularities detected – Criteria to be applied – Directive 2004/18/EC – Point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 45(2) – Concept of ‘grave professional misconduct’.#Case C-545/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20371Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 15 December 2022.#F.F. v Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde and CRIF GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Data subject’s right of access to his or her data undergoing processing – Article 15(3) – Provision of a copy of the data – Concept of ‘copy’ – Concept of ‘information’.#Case C-487/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20372Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 15 December 2022.#Ocilion IPTV Technologies GmbH v Seven.One Entertainment Group GmbH and Puls 4 TV GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright in the information society – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3 – Right of communication to the public – Article 5(2)(b) – ‘Private copying’ exception – Provider of an Internet Protocol television (IPTV) service – Access to protected content without the rightholders’ consent – Online video recorder – Replay function – De-duplication technique.#Case C-426/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20373Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 15 December 2022.#European Superleague Company, SL v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) and Union of European Football Associations (UEFA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Internal market – Rules introduced by international sports associations – Professional football – Private law entities vested with regulatory, control and decision-making powers, and the power to impose sanctions – Rules on prior approval of competitions, on the participation of football clubs and players in those competitions, and also on the exploitation of commercial and media rights related to those competitions – Parallel pursuit of economic activities – Organisation and marketing of competitions – Exploitation of related commercial and media rights – Article 101(1) TFEU – Decision by an association of undertakings adversely affecting competition – Concepts of anticompetitive ‘object’ and ‘effect’ – Exemption under Article 101(3) TFEU – Conditions – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Justification – Conditions – Article 56 TFEU – Restrictions on the freedom to provide services – Justification – Conditions – Burden of proof.#Case C-333/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20374Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 15 December 2022.#European Investment Bank and European Commission v ClientEarth.#Appeal – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 2(1)(f) – Concept of ‘environmental law’ – Article 2(1)(g) – Concept of ‘administrative act’ – Article 10(1) – Internal review of administrative acts – Resolution of the Board of Directors of the European Investment Bank (EIB) approving the financing of a biomass power generation plant – Rejection of the request for internal review of that resolution as inadmissible – Independence of the EIB in the sphere of its financial operations – Article 271(c) TFEU – Scope.#Joined Cases C-212/21 P and C-223/21 P.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20375Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 15 December 2022.###cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20376Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 15 December 2022.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ‐ Rule of law – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Independence of judges – Article 267 TFEU – Possibility of making a reference to the Court for a preliminary ruling – Primacy of EU law – Jurisdiction in relation to the lifting of the immunity from criminal prosecution of judges and in the field of employment law, social security and retirement of judges of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) conferred on the Disciplinary Chamber of that court – National courts prohibited from calling into question the legitimacy of the constitutional courts and bodies or from establishing or assessing the lawfulness of the appointment of judges or their judicial powers – Verification by a judge of compliance with certain requirements relating to the existence of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law classified as a ‘disciplinary offence’ – Exclusive jurisdiction to examine questions relating to the lack of independence of a court or judge conferred on the Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs Chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court) – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Rights to privacy and the protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 6(1), first subparagraph, points (c) and (e), and Article 6(3), second subparagraph – Article 9(1) – Sensitive data – National legislation requiring judges to make a declaration as to whether they belong to associations, foundations or political parties, and to the positions held within those associations, foundations or political parties, and providing for the placing online of the data contained in those declarations.#Case C-204/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20377Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 15 December 2022.#G. and Others v M.S. and X.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Katowicach and Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Possibility for the referring court to take account of the preliminary ruling of the Court – Interpretation sought by the referring court necessary to enable it to give judgment – Independence of the judiciary – Conditions for the appointment of judges of the ordinary courts – Possibility of challenging an order which has definitively ruled on an application for the grant of interim measures – Possibility of removing a judge from a panel of judges of the court – Inadmissibility of the requests for a preliminary ruling.#Joined Cases C-181/21 and C-269/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20378Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 15 December 2022.#European Parliament v European Commission.#Action for failure to act – Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 – Point (f) of the first paragraph of Article 7 – List of third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of the Member State – List of third countries whose nationals are exempt from that requirement – Principle of reciprocity – Request to adopt a delegated act temporarily suspending the visa exemption for a 12-month period for nationals of the United States of America.#Case C-137/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20379Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 15 December 2022.#International Skating Union v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Rules introduced by an international sports association – Skating – Private law entity vested with regulatory, control and decision-making powers, and the power to impose sanctions – Rules on the prior approval of competitions, the participation of athletes in those competitions and the arbitration rules governing conflicts – Parallel pursuit of economic activities – Organisation and marketing of competitions – Article 101(1) TFEU – Decision by an association of undertakings adversely affecting competition – Concepts of anticompetitive ‘object’ and ‘effect’ – Possible justification – Conditions.#Case C-124/21 P.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.
20380Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 15 December 2022.#Prestige and Limousine, S.L. v Área Metropolitana de Barcelona and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Article 107(1) TFEU – Private-hire vehicles (PHVs) – Licencing scheme involving the issue, in addition to a licence to provide urban and interurban transport services throughout the national territory, of a second operating licence in order to be able to provide urban transport services in a metropolitan area – Limitation of the number of licences for PHV services to one thirtieth of the licences for taxi services.#Case C-50/21.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2022 г.