20061Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#HSBC Holdings plc and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Euro Interest Rate Derivatives sector – Decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Manipulation of the Euribor interbank reference rates – Exchange of confidential information – Restriction of competition by object – Characterisation – Taking into account of procompetitive effects – Single and continuous infringement – ‘Hybrid’ procedure having led successively to the adoption of a settlement decision and a decision made under the ordinary procedure – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Right to good administration – Article 48 – Presumption of innocence.#Case C-883/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20062Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#HSBC Holdings plc and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Euro Interest Rate Derivatives sector – Decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Manipulation of the Euribor interbank reference rates – Exchange of confidential information – Restriction of competition by object – Characterisation – Taking into account of procompetitive effects – Single and continuous infringement – ‘Hybrid’ procedure having led successively to the adoption of a settlement decision and a decision made under the ordinary procedure – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Right to good administration – Article 48 – Presumption of innocence.#Case C-883/19 P.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20063Case C-883/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2023 — HSBC Holdings plc, HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Continental Europe, formerly HSBC France v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Euro Interest Rate Derivatives sector — Decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Manipulation of the Euribor interbank reference rates — Exchange of confidential information — Restriction of competition by object — Characterisation — Taking into account of procompetitive effects — Single and continuous infringement — ‘Hybrid’ procedure having led successively to the adoption of a settlement decision and a decision made under the ordinary procedure — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 41 — Right to good administration — Article 48 — Presumption of innocence)cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20064Case C-10/23, Remia Com Impex: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania) lodged on 11 January 2023 — Remia Com Impex SRL v Autoritatea Națională Sanitară Veterinară și pentru Siguranța Alimentelor, Direcția Sanitară Veterinară și pentru Siguranța Alimentelor Doljcjeu_case · 11 января 2023 г.
20065Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 January 2023 (Extracts).#Hecht Pharma GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Gufic – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Public and outward use – Extent of use – Nature and form of use – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered.#Case T-346/21.cjeu_case · 11 января 2023 г.
20066Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 January 2023 (Extracts).#Hecht Pharma GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Gufic – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Public and outward use – Extent of use – Nature and form of use – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered.#Case T-346/21.cjeu_case · 11 января 2023 г.
20067Case T-346/21: Judgment of the General Court of 11 January 2023 — Hecht Pharma v EUIPO — Gufic BioSciences (Gufic) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark Gufic — Genuine use of the mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Public and outward use — Extent of use — Nature and form of use — Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered)cjeu_case · 11 января 2023 г.
20068Case T-5/23: Action brought on 10 January 2023 — Illumina v Commissioncjeu_case · 10 января 2023 г.
20069Case C-7/23, Marvesa Rotterdam: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) lodged on 10 January 2023 — Marvesa Rotterdam NV v Federaal Agentschap voor de veiligheid van de voedselketen (FAVV)cjeu_case · 10 января 2023 г.
20070Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 January 2023.#Ambisig - Ambiente e Sistemas de Informação Geográfica SA v Fundação do Desporto and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement of service, supply and works contracts – Directive 2014/24/EU – Conduct of the procedure – Choice of participants and award of contracts – Article 63 – Economic operator relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority – Obligation of that economic operator to submit the qualification documents of a subcontractor after the tender has been awarded – Incompatibility.#Case C-469/22.cjeu_case · 10 января 2023 г.
20071Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 January 2023.#Ambisig - Ambiente e Sistemas de Informação Geográfica SA v Fundação do Desporto and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement of service, supply and works contracts – Directive 2014/24/EU – Conduct of the procedure – Choice of participants and award of contracts – Article 63 – Economic operator relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority – Obligation of that economic operator to submit the qualification documents of a subcontractor after the tender has been awarded – Incompatibility.#Case C-469/22.cjeu_case · 10 января 2023 г.
20072Case C-469/22: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Ambisig — Ambiente e Sistemas de Informação Geográfica SA v Fundação do Desporto, ANO — Sistemas de Informática e Serviços Lda, Link Consulting — Tecnologias de Informação SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Public procurement of service, supply and works contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Conduct of the procedure — Choice of participants and award of contracts — Article 63 — Economic operator relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority — Obligation of that economic operator to submit the qualification documents of a subcontractor after the tender has been awarded — Incompatibility)cjeu_case · 10 января 2023 г.
20073Case T-9/23: Action brought on 9 January 2023 — Koppers Denmark and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 9 января 2023 г.
20075Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 January 2023.#A.T.S. 2003 Vagyonvédelmi és Szolgáltató Zrt., 'f.a.', v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 167, 168 and 178 – Right to deduct input VAT – Tax evasion – Proof – Duty of care of the taxable person – Consideration of an infringement of the national provisions governing the supply of services at issue.#Case C-289/22.cjeu_case · 9 января 2023 г.
20076Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 January 2023.#A.T.S. 2003 Vagyonvédelmi és Szolgáltató Zrt., 'f.a.', v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 167, 168 and 178 – Right to deduct input VAT – Tax evasion – Proof – Duty of care of the taxable person – Consideration of an infringement of the national provisions governing the supply of services at issue.#Case C-289/22.cjeu_case · 9 января 2023 г.
20077Case C-289/22, A.T.S. 2003: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — A.T.S. 2003 Vagyonvédelmi és Szolgáltató Zrt., in liquidation v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 167, 168 and 178 — Right to deduct input VAT — Fraud — Proof — Duty of care of the taxable person — Consideration of an infringement of the national provisions governing the supply of services at issue)cjeu_case · 9 января 2023 г.
20079Case T-2/23: Action brought on 5 January 2023 — Romagnoli Fratelli v CPVOcjeu_case · 5 января 2023 г.
20080Case C-5/23 P: Appeal brought on 5 January 2023 by the European Union Intellectual Property Office against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 26 October 2022 in Case T-298/20, KD v EUIPOcjeu_case · 5 января 2023 г.