20021Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#KT and NS v FTI Touristik GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 14(1) – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Performance of a package travel contract – Liability of the organiser concerned – Measures to fight the worldwide spread of an infectious disease – COVID-19 pandemic – Restrictions imposed at the travel destination and in the place of residence of the traveller concerned and in other countries – Lack of conformity of the services provided as part of the package concerned – Appropriate reduction in the price of that package.#Case C-396/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20022Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#D.V. v M.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Contract for the provision of legal services concluded between a lawyer and a consumer – Article 4(2) – Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms – Exclusion of terms relating to the main subject matter of the contract – Term providing for the payment of lawyers’ fees on the basis of an hourly rate – Article 6(1) – Powers of the national court when dealing with a term considered to be ‘unfair’.#Case C-395/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20023Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#D.V. v M.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Contract for the provision of legal services concluded between a lawyer and a consumer – Article 4(2) – Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms – Exclusion of terms relating to the main subject matter of the contract – Term providing for the payment of lawyers’ fees on the basis of an hourly rate – Article 6(1) – Powers of the national court when dealing with a term considered to be ‘unfair’.#Case C-395/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20024Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#J.K. v TP S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 3(1)(a) and (c) – Conditions for access to self-employment – Employment and working conditions – Prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation – Self-employed person working on the basis of a contract for specific work – Termination and non-renewal of contract – Freedom to choose a contracting party.#Case C-356/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20025Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#J.K. v TP S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 3(1)(a) and (c) – Conditions for access to self-employment – Employment and working conditions – Prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation – Self-employed person working on the basis of a contract for specific work – Termination and non-renewal of contract – Freedom to choose a contracting party.#Case C-356/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20026Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v B. and F, K. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#References for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Lodging of multiple applications for international protection in three Member States – Article 29 – Time limit for transfer – Expiry – Transfer of responsibility for examining the application – Article 27 – Remedy – Scope of judicial review – Possibility for the applicant to rely on the transfer of responsibility for examining the application.#Joined Cases C-323/21 to C-325/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20027Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v B. and F, K. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#References for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Lodging of multiple applications for international protection in three Member States – Article 29 – Time limit for transfer – Expiry – Transfer of responsibility for examining the application – Article 27 – Remedy – Scope of judicial review – Possibility for the applicant to rely on the transfer of responsibility for examining the application.#Joined Cases C-323/21 to C-325/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20028Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#P.I. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Eligibility for refugee status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 10(1)(e) and (2) – Reasons for persecution – Concepts of ‘political opinion’ and ‘attributed political opinion’ – Attempts by an applicant for asylum to defend himself, in his country of origin, by legal means against non-State actors acting illegally and in a position to exploit the mechanism by which that State imposes penalties for criminal offences.#Case C-280/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20029Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#P.I. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Eligibility for refugee status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 10(1)(e) and (2) – Reasons for persecution – Concepts of ‘political opinion’ and ‘attributed political opinion’ – Attempts by an applicant for asylum to defend himself, in his country of origin, by legal means against non-State actors acting illegally and in a position to exploit the mechanism by which that State imposes penalties for criminal offences.#Case C-280/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20030Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#RW v Österreichische Post AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 15(1)(c) – Data subject’s right of access to his or her data – Information about the recipients or categories of recipient to whom the personal data have been or will be disclosed – Restrictions.#Case C-154/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20031Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#RW v Österreichische Post AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 15(1)(c) – Data subject’s right of access to his or her data – Information about the recipients or categories of recipient to whom the personal data have been or will be disclosed – Restrictions.#Case C-154/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20032Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 77 to 79 – Remedies – Parallel exercise – Relationship – Procedural autonomy – Effectiveness of the protection rules established by that regulation – Consistent and homogeneous application of those rules throughout the European Union – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-132/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20033Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 77 to 79 – Remedies – Parallel exercise – Relationship – Procedural autonomy – Effectiveness of the protection rules established by that regulation – Consistent and homogeneous application of those rules throughout the European Union – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-132/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20034Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#RegioJet a. s. v České dráhy a.s. and.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Abuse of a dominant position – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Directive 2014/104/EU – Articles 5 and 6 – Disclosure of evidence – Evidence in a competition authority’s file – Proceedings relating to an infringement of competition rules pending before the European Commission – National proceedings relating to an action for damages with regard to the same infringement – Conditions for the disclosure of evidence.#Case C-57/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20035Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#RegioJet a. s. v České dráhy a.s. and.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Abuse of a dominant position – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Directive 2014/104/EU – Articles 5 and 6 – Disclosure of evidence – Evidence in a competition authority’s file – Proceedings relating to an infringement of competition rules pending before the European Commission – National proceedings relating to an action for damages with regard to the same infringement – Conditions for the disclosure of evidence.#Case C-57/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20036Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Rail freight market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU – Access by third-party undertakings to infrastructure managed by Lithuania’s national railway company – Removal of a section of railway track – Concept of ‘abuse’ – Actual or likely exclusion of a competitor – Exercise by the General Court of its powers of unlimited jurisdiction – Reduction of the fine.#Case C-42/21 P.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20037Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Rail freight market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU – Access by third-party undertakings to infrastructure managed by Lithuania’s national railway company – Removal of a section of railway track – Concept of ‘abuse’ – Actual or likely exclusion of a competitor – Exercise by the General Court of its powers of unlimited jurisdiction – Reduction of the fine.#Case C-42/21 P.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20038Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 12 January 2023.#PAO Severstal and Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1328 – Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 – Article 18(1) – Necessary information – Absence – Article 9(4) – ‘Lesser duty rule’ – Target price – Profit margin of the Union industry – Establishment – Selection of the most recent representative year – Article 2(9) – Construction of the export price – Injury to the Union industry – Application by analogy – Calculation of the underselling margin – Statement of reasons.#Joined Cases C-747/21 P and C-748/21 P.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20039Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 12 January 2023.#Fluvius Antwerpen v MX.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vredegerecht te Antwerpen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Taxable transactions – Article 2(1)(a) – Concept of ‘supply of goods for consideration’ – Article 9(1) – Economic activity – Article 14(1) and (2)(a) – Supply of goods – Unlawful consumption of electricity – Principle of neutrality of VAT – Charging the consumer for compensation including the price of the electricity consumed – Regional legislation of a Member State – Taxable person – Sui generis entity mandated by municipalities – Concept of ‘body governed by public law’ – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 13(1), third subparagraph, and Annex I – Principle of taxability of electricity distribution – Concept of ‘negligible activity’.#Case C-677/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.
20040Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 12 January 2023.#Criminal proceedings against Politseyski organ pri 02 RU SDVR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Article 6 – Right of a person to be informed of the charges against him or her – Article 7 – Right of access to case materials – Effective exercise of the rights of the defence – Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to liberty and security – Communication of the grounds for detention of the suspect or accused person in a separate document – When that communication must be made.#Case C-608/21.cjeu_case · 12 января 2023 г.