Документы: Европейский Союз

316838 документа
1930

Case T-194/25, Scrap-Transporteur: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 29 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof – Germany) – Hauptzollamt A v Scrap-Transporteur (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco – Smoking tobacco – Concept of tobacco capable of being smoked without further industrial processing – Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 2011/64/UE – Scraps of raw tobacco, uncut but threshed and stripped, capable of being processed into water-pipe tobacco through a complex process carried out at home by the consumer)

cjeu_case ·
1935

Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 29 avril 2026.#Dmitry Konov contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription et maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Notion de “femme ou homme d’affaires influent ayant une activité en Russie” – Notion de “femme ou homme d’affaires ayant une activité dans des secteurs économiques qui fournissent une source substantielle de revenus au gouvernement de la Fédération de Russie” – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous g), du règlement (UE) no 269/2014 – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective – Obligation de motivation – Erreur d’appréciation – Proportionnalité – Égalité de traitement – Droit de propriété – Liberté d’entreprise – Droit au respect de la vie privée – Responsabilité non contractuelle.#Affaire T-600/24.

cjeu_case ·
1936

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Romagnoli Fratelli SpA v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Grant of a Community plant variety right for the potato variety Melrose – Failure to pay the annual fee on time – Cancellation of right – Application for restitutio in integrum – Competence of the Board of Appeal – Concept of ‘particular circumstances’ – Conditions for notification of decisions and communications of the CPVO.#Case T-573/24.

cjeu_case ·
1937

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Romagnoli Fratelli SpA v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Grant of a Community plant variety right for the potato variety Melrose – Failure to pay the annual fee on time – Cancellation of right – Application for restitutio in integrum – Competence of the Board of Appeal – Concept of ‘particular circumstances’ – Conditions for notification of decisions and communications of the CPVO.#Case T-573/24.

cjeu_case ·
1938

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Isabel Sánchez v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/391/21 – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Normalisation of marks – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Duration of the administrative procedure – Reasonable period of time.#Case T-229/24.

cjeu_case ·
1939

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Isabel Sánchez v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/391/21 – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Normalisation of marks – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Duration of the administrative procedure – Reasonable period of time.#Case T-229/24.

cjeu_case ·
1940

Case T-600/24: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2026 – Konov v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of leading businessperson operating in Russia – Concept of businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to respect for private life – Non-contractual liability)

cjeu_case ·