Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 документов
19301

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 May 2024.#'Entain Services (Bulgaria)' EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia 'Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika' Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Freedom of establishment – Restrictions – Corporation tax – Taxation of dividends – Companies registered in Gibraltar.#Case C-287/23.

cjeu_case ·
19302

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 May 2024.#Touristic Aviation Services Limited v Flightright GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Compensation for air passengers in the event of long delay of flights – Article 5(3) – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Extraordinary circumstances – Shortage of staff of the airport operator providing baggage loading services.#Case C-405/23.

cjeu_case ·
19303

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 May 2024.#Touristic Aviation Services Limited v Flightright GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Compensation for air passengers in the event of long delay of flights – Article 5(3) – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Extraordinary circumstances – Shortage of staff of the airport operator providing baggage loading services.#Case C-405/23.

cjeu_case ·
19304

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 May 2024.#‘Toplofikatsia Sofia’ EAD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Order for payment procedure – Concept of ‘domicile’ – National of a Member State having his or her permanent address in that Member State and his or her current address in another Member State – No possibility of changing or renouncing that permanent address.#Case C-222/23.

cjeu_case ·
19305

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 May 2024.#‘Toplofikatsia Sofia’ EAD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Order for payment procedure – Concept of ‘domicile’ – National of a Member State having his or her permanent address in that Member State and his or her current address in another Member State – No possibility of changing or renouncing that permanent address.#Case C-222/23.

cjeu_case ·
19306

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 May 2024.#FV v Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Equal treatment – Social advantages – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Family allowance – Worker having custody of a child placed with that worker by a court order – Resident worker and non-resident worker – Difference in treatment – No justification.#Case C-27/23.

cjeu_case ·
19307

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 May 2024.#FV v Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Luxembourg).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Equal treatment – Social advantages – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Family allowance – Worker having custody of a child placed with that worker by a court order – Resident worker and non-resident worker – Difference in treatment – No justification.#Case C-27/23.

cjeu_case ·
19308

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 16 May 2024.#Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria v A and and S.E.I v Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 1 de Alicante and Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 10 de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Directive (EU) 2019/1023 – Procedures concerning restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt – Article 1(4) – Subject matter and scope – Extension of procedures to insolvent natural persons who are not entrepreneurs – Article 20 – Access to discharge of debt – Article 23(1), (2) and (4) – Derogations – Exclusion of specific categories of debt from discharge of debt – Natural person who has become insolvent – Good faith of the debtor – Conditions for access to discharge of debt – Exclusion of claims governed by public law.#Joined Cases C-289/23 and C-305/23.

cjeu_case ·
19309

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 16 May 2024.#Hengshi Egypt Fiberglass Fabrics SAE and Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry SAE v European Commission.#Appeal – Common commercial policy – Protection against subsidised imports from third countries – Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures of the World Trade Organization (WTO) – Articles 1 and 2 – Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Articles 2 to 4 – Concepts of ‘subsidy’, ‘government’, ‘specificity’ and ‘benefit’ – Financial contributions granted by Chinese public bodies to undertakings incorporated under Egyptian law owned by Chinese entities established in the China-Egypt Suez Economic and Trade Cooperation Zone – Possibility of classifying such financial contributions as subsidies granted by the Government of Egypt, having regard to that government’s own conduct – Whether permissible – Conditions – Financial contribution consisting in forgoing government revenue that is otherwise due – Benefit conferred on the recipient undertakings – Choice of the relevant reference situation for the purpose of characterising the existence of that financial contribution and that benefit – Articles 5 and 6 – Calculation of the benefit – Concepts of ‘recipient’ and ‘undertaking’.#Joined Cases C-269/23 P and C-272/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
19310

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 16 May 2024.#Land Niedersachsen v Conti 11. Container Schiffahrts-GmbH & Co. KG MS 'MSC Flaminia'.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Shipment of waste – Directive 2006/12/EC – Directive 2008/98/EC – Concept of ‘waste’ – Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal – Article 1(4) – Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 – Waste subject to the prior written notification and consent procedure – Shipments of waste within the European Union – Article 1(3)(b) – Validity – Interpretation in conformity with the Basel Convention – Waste generated on board a ship following damage sustained by it on the high seas – Concept of ‘offloading of waste’ – Partial offloading of waste in a safe port.#Case C-188/23.

cjeu_case ·
19311

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 16 May 2024.#protectus s.r.o. v Výbor Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky na preskúmavanie rozhodnutí Národného bezpečnostného úradu.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Decision 2013/488/EU – Classified information – Facility Security Clearance – Withdrawal of the clearance – Non-disclosure of classified information on which the withdrawal was based – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Access to the file – Principle of an adversarial process – Article 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Implementation of EU law.#Case C-185/23.

cjeu_case ·
19312

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 16 May 2024.#Finanzamt T v S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC – Article 2(1) – Article 4(4), second subparagraph – Taxable persons – Option for Member States to treat as a single taxable person, known as a ‘VAT group’, persons who, while legally independent, are closely bound to one another by financial, economic and organisational links – Services provided within the VAT group – Taxation of such services – Recipient of the services not entitled to deduct VAT – Risk of tax losses.#Case C-184/23.

cjeu_case ·
19314

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 16 May 2024.#K and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Return of third-country nationals staying illegally in a Member State – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 5 – Principle of non-refoulement – Enforcement of a return decision adopted in the context of a procedure for international protection, as a result of the illegal stay of the third-country national concerned arising from the rejection of an application for a residence permit provided for by national law – Obligation for the administrative authority to assess whether the enforcement of such a decision complies with the principle of non-refoulement – Article 13 – Remedies against decisions related to return – Obligation, for the national court, to raise of its own motion infringement of the principle of non-refoulement when enforcing a return decision – Scope – Article 4, Article 19(2) and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-156/23.

cjeu_case ·
19315

Case C-287/23, Entain Services (Bulgaria): Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad – Bulgaria) – Entain Services (Bulgaria) EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Freedom of establishment – Restrictions – Corporation tax – Taxation of dividends – Companies registered in Gibraltar)

cjeu_case ·
19316

Case C-405/23, Touristic Aviation Services: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln - Germany) – Touristic Aviation Services Limited v Flightright GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Compensation for air passengers in the event of long delay of flights – Article 5(3) – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Extraordinary circumstances – Shortage of staff of the airport operator providing baggage loading services)

cjeu_case ·
19317

Case C-222/23, Toplofikatsia Sofia (Concept of the defendant’s domicile): Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – Toplofikatsia Sofia EAD (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Order for payment procedure – Concept of domicile – National of a Member State having his or her permanent address in that Member State and his or her current address in another Member State – No possibility of changing or renouncing that permanent address)

cjeu_case ·
19318

Case C-27/23, Hocinx: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg - Luxembourg) – FV v Caisse pour l’avenir des enfants (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Equal treatment – Social advantages – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(2) – Family allowance – Worker having custody of a child placed with that worker by a court order – Resident worker and non-resident worker – Difference in treatment – No justification)

cjeu_case ·
19319

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 May 2024.#Slovenské Energetické Strojárne a.s. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Detailed rules for the refund of VAT to taxable persons not established in the Member State of refund – Directive 2008/9/EC – Article 20 – Request for additional information made by the Member State of refund – Information to be provided within a one-month period – Discontinuation of the procedure on account of failure by the taxable person to provide additional information within that time limit – Article 23 – Refusal to take account of information provided for the first time in the appeal procedure – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of VAT neutrality – Principle of good administration.#Case C-746/22.

cjeu_case ·
19320

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 May 2024.#Slovenské Energetické Strojárne a.s. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Detailed rules for the refund of VAT to taxable persons not established in the Member State of refund – Directive 2008/9/EC – Article 20 – Request for additional information made by the Member State of refund – Information to be provided within a one-month period – Discontinuation of the procedure on account of failure by the taxable person to provide additional information within that time limit – Article 23 – Refusal to take account of information provided for the first time in the appeal procedure – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of VAT neutrality – Principle of good administration.#Case C-746/22.

cjeu_case ·