Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161316) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43188) directive (8067)
316 885 документов
15741

Case T-194/23: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2024 – Fractal Analytics v EUIPO – Fractalia Remote Systems (FRACTALIA) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark FRACTALIA – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 18(1) and (2) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Nature of use – Assessment of the evidence – Comparison between the subcategories of services used and the specification of the services covered by the trade mark)

cjeu_case ·
15743

Arrêt du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 16 octobre 2024.#Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis contre Agence exécutive du Conseil européen de la recherche.#Clause compromissoire – Septième programme-cadre pour des actions de recherche, de développement technologique et de démonstration (2007-2013) – Convention de subvention – Coûts éligibles – Frais de personnel – Enquête de l’OLAF – Charge de la preuve – Droit d’être entendu – Droit à un recours effectif.#Affaire T-388/22.

cjeu_case ·
15745

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 October 2024.#Silex Ipari Automatizálási Zrt. (Silex Zrt.) v European Innovation Council and SMEs Executive Agency.#Arbitration clause – Technological research and development – Framework Programme for Research and Innovation ‘Horizon 2020’ (2014-2020) – Grant agreement – Action for annulment – Debit note – Letter rejecting declared costs as ineligible and ordering the recovery of a contribution paid to the guarantee fund – Acts not amenable to review – Acts forming part of a purely contractual framework from which they are inseparable – Inadmissibility – Reclassification of the action – Obligation to state reasons – Eligible costs – Proportionality.#Case T-654/20.

cjeu_case ·
15746

Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 16 octobre 2024.#Silex Ipari Automatizálási Zrt. (Silex Zrt.) contre Agence exécutive pour le Conseil européen de l’innovation et les PME.#Clause compromissoire – Recherche et développement technologique – Programme-cadre pour la recherche et l’innovation “Horizon 2020” (2014-2020) – Convention de subvention – Recours en annulation – Note de débit – Lettre rejetant des coûts déclarés inéligibles et ordonnant la récupération d’une contribution versée au fonds de garantie – Actes non susceptibles de recours – Actes s’inscrivant dans un cadre purement contractuel dont ils sont indissociables – Irrecevabilité – Requalification du recours – Obligation de motivation – Coûts éligibles – Proportionnalité.#Affaire T-654/20.

cjeu_case ·
15747

Case T-654/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2024 – Silex v Eismea (Arbitration clause – Technological research and development – Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 (2014-2020) – Grant agreement – Action for annulment – Debit note – Letter rejecting declared costs as ineligible and ordering the recovery of a contribution paid to the guarantee fund – Acts not amenable to review – Acts forming part of a purely contractual framework from which they are inseparable – Inadmissibility – Reclassification of the action – Obligation to state reasons – Eligible costs – Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
15756

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2024.#Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank.#Action for damages – Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw the authorisation of the credit institution – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-1056/23.

cjeu_case ·
15757

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2024.#Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank.#Action for damages – Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw the authorisation of the credit institution – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-1056/23.

cjeu_case ·
15758

Case T-1056/23: Order of the General Court of 15 October 2024 – Pilatus Bank v ECB (Action for damages – Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw the authorisation of the credit institution – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
15759

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 October 2024.#KUBERA, trgovanje s hrano in pijačo, d.o.o. v Republika Slovenija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Proceedings relating to the grant of leave to appeal on a point of law to the supreme court of a Member State – Request by the party seeking leave to appeal on a point of law that a question concerning the interpretation of EU law be referred to the Court of Justice – National legislation under which leave to appeal on a point of law is to be granted if the appeal raises a question of law that is important for ensuring legal certainty, the uniform application of the law or its development – Obligation for the national supreme court to consider, in proceedings relating to the grant of leave to appeal on a point of law, whether a reference for a preliminary ruling should be made – Statement of reasons for the decision refusing leave to appeal on a point of law.#Case C-144/23.

cjeu_case ·
15760

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 October 2024.#KUBERA, trgovanje s hrano in pijačo, d.o.o. v Republika Slovenija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Proceedings relating to the grant of leave to appeal on a point of law to the supreme court of a Member State – Request by the party seeking leave to appeal on a point of law that a question concerning the interpretation of EU law be referred to the Court of Justice – National legislation under which leave to appeal on a point of law is to be granted if the appeal raises a question of law that is important for ensuring legal certainty, the uniform application of the law or its development – Obligation for the national supreme court to consider, in proceedings relating to the grant of leave to appeal on a point of law, whether a reference for a preliminary ruling should be made – Statement of reasons for the decision refusing leave to appeal on a point of law.#Case C-144/23.

cjeu_case ·