Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161316) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43188) directive (8067)
316 885 документов
14701

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 20 November 2024.#Pernod Ricard v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark The King of Soho – Earlier EU and national word marks SOHO – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Correction of the decision of the Board of Appeal – Article 102 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-13/24.

cjeu_case ·
14705

Case T-13/24: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2024 – Pernod Ricard v EUIPO – West End Drinks (The King of Soho) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark The King of Soho – Earlier EU and national word marks SOHO – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Correction of the decision of the Board of Appeal – Article 102 of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
14707

Case C-803/24, Romcab and RTZ & Partners: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Târgu Mureș (Romania) lodged on 20 November 2024 – Romcab SA, RTZ & Partners SPRL, as liquidator of Romcab SA v Banca Comercială Română SA, Banca Transilvania, CEC Bank SA – Sucursala București, Codelco Kupferhandel GmbH, Compania de Asigurări Reasigurări-Exim România (Care România) SA, Euro Alloys Ltd, MKE Mansfeld GmbH, First Bank SA, Rusal Marketing GmbH, Unicredit Leasing Corporation IFN S.A.

cjeu_case ·
14713

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 November 2024.#Enrique Pich-Aguilera Molins v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Carmen says – Earlier national figurative mark del Carmen – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Reimbursement of representation costs – Article 109 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-1134/23.

cjeu_case ·
14714

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 November 2024.#Enrique Pich-Aguilera Molins v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Carmen says – Earlier national figurative mark del Carmen – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Reimbursement of representation costs – Article 109 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-1134/23.

cjeu_case ·
14715

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2024.#Evgeny Borisovich Zubitskiy v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Proportionality – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1074/23.

cjeu_case ·
14716

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2024.#Evgeny Borisovich Zubitskiy v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Proportionality – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1074/23.

cjeu_case ·
14717

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2024.#Artem Alexandrovich Uss v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Misuse of power – Abuse of rights – Proportionality.#Case T-571/23.

cjeu_case ·
14718

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2024.#Artem Alexandrovich Uss v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Misuse of power – Abuse of rights – Proportionality.#Case T-571/23.

cjeu_case ·