Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161316) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43188) directive (8067)
316 885 документов
12422

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Criminal proceedings against AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law or admits of no reasonable doubt – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Scope – Judgment ordering the committal of a person to a facility for offenders with mental illness – Suspension subject to that person undergoing medical treatment.#Case C-766/24.

cjeu_case ·
12423

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Criminal proceedings against AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Protodikeio Peiraios.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law or admits of no reasonable doubt – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Scope – Judgment ordering the committal of a person to a facility for offenders with mental illness – Suspension subject to that person undergoing medical treatment.#Case C-766/24.

cjeu_case ·
12424

Case C-766/24, Eisaggelia Protodikon Peiraia: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Protodikeio Peiraios (Trimeles Plimmeleiodikeio Peiraios) (Greece)) – Criminal proceedings against AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law or admits of no reasonable doubt – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Scope – Judgment ordering the committal of a person to a facility for offenders with mental illness – Suspension subject to that person undergoing medical treatment)

cjeu_case ·
12429

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Schweppes International Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative marks MAY TEA – International registration of the earlier figurative marks МАЙСКИЙ – International registration of the earlier word mark МАЙСКИЙ ЧАЙ – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Joined Cases T-1066/23 to T-1069/23.

cjeu_case ·
12430

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Schweppes International Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative marks MAY TEA – International registration of the earlier figurative marks МАЙСКИЙ – International registration of the earlier word mark МАЙСКИЙ ЧАЙ – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Joined Cases T-1066/23 to T-1069/23.

cjeu_case ·
12433

Joined Cases T-1066/23 to T-1069/23: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – Schweppes International v EUIPO – May (MAY TEA) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative marks MAY TEA – International registration of the earlier figurative marks МАЙСКИЙ – International registration of the earlier word mark МАЙСКИЙ ЧАЙ – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
12434

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 26 February 2025 (Extracts).#Aleksandra Melnichenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Fundamental rights – Proportionality.#Case T-498/22.

cjeu_case ·
12435

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 26 February 2025 (Extracts).#Aleksandra Melnichenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Fundamental rights – Proportionality.#Case T-498/22.

cjeu_case ·
12436

Case T-498/22: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – Melnichenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of association – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Fundamental rights – Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
12437

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#E.B. v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of EU law by the Court of Justice – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-748/22.

cjeu_case ·
12438

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#E.B. v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Arcidosso.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of EU law by the Court of Justice – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-748/22.

cjeu_case ·
12439

Case C-748/22 Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others (Remuneration of honorary judges and public prosecutors II): Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Arcidosso – Italy) – E.B. v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of EU law by the Court of Justice – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·