Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161316) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43188) directive (8067)
316 885 документов
9381

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 June 2025.#Pavel Ezubov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘person benefitting from a leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Error of assessment.#Case T-273/24.

cjeu_case ·
9382

Case T-495/24: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2025 – FG v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Deduction of the capital appreciation between the date of the application for a transfer and the actual date of the transfer – Repayment of part of the amount of the appreciation – Right to property – Plea of illegality)

cjeu_case ·
9385

Case T-273/24: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2025 – Ezubov v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of person benefitting from a leading businessperson – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
9386

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 June 2025.#Comité interprofessionnel du vin de Champagne and Institut national de l'origine et de la qualité (INAO) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark NERO CHAMPAGNE – Earlier PDO ‘Champagne’ – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a) and (c) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Trade mark that contains a PDO – Products complying with the product specification of the PDO – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-239/23.

cjeu_case ·
9387

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 June 2025.#Comité interprofessionnel du vin de Champagne and Institut national de l'origine et de la qualité (INAO) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark NERO CHAMPAGNE – Earlier PDO ‘Champagne’ – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a) and (c) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Trade mark that contains a PDO – Products complying with the product specification of the PDO – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-239/23.

cjeu_case ·
9388

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 June 2025.#Uniper Global Commodities SE v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – ACER decision on the amendment to the methodology for pricing balancing energy – Imposition of a temporary price limit – Appeal brought before the Board of Appeal of ACER – Specific conditions and arrangements concerning actions – Article 28(1) and Article 29 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility due to lack of standing to bring an appeal before the Board of Appeal – Plea of illegality – Equality before the law and effective judicial protection – Lack of individual concern – Attributes or factual circumstances not raised – Time limit for bringing proceedings – No excusable error.#Case T-96/23.

cjeu_case ·
9389

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 June 2025.#Uniper Global Commodities SE v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – ACER decision on the amendment to the methodology for pricing balancing energy – Imposition of a temporary price limit – Appeal brought before the Board of Appeal of ACER – Specific conditions and arrangements concerning actions – Article 28(1) and Article 29 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility due to lack of standing to bring an appeal before the Board of Appeal – Plea of illegality – Equality before the law and effective judicial protection – Lack of individual concern – Attributes or factual circumstances not raised – Time limit for bringing proceedings – No excusable error.#Case T-96/23.

cjeu_case ·
9390

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 June 2025.#RWE Supply & Trading GmbH v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – ACER decision on the amendment to the methodology for pricing balancing energy – Imposition of a temporary price limit – Appeal brought before the Board of Appeal of ACER – Specific conditions and arrangements concerning actions – Article 28(1) and Article 29 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility due to lack of standing to bring an appeal before the Board of Appeal – Plea of illegality – Equality before the law and effective judicial protection – Lack of individual concern – Attributes or factual circumstances not raised – Time limit for bringing proceedings – No excusable error.#Case T-95/23.

cjeu_case ·
9391

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 June 2025.#RWE Supply & Trading GmbH v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – ACER decision on the amendment to the methodology for pricing balancing energy – Imposition of a temporary price limit – Appeal brought before the Board of Appeal of ACER – Specific conditions and arrangements concerning actions – Article 28(1) and Article 29 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility due to lack of standing to bring an appeal before the Board of Appeal – Plea of illegality – Equality before the law and effective judicial protection – Lack of individual concern – Attributes or factual circumstances not raised – Time limit for bringing proceedings – No excusable error.#Case T-95/23.

cjeu_case ·
9392

Case T-239/23: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2025 – Comité interprofessionnel du vin de Champagne and INAO v EUIPO – Nero Lifestyle (NERO CHAMPAGNE) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark NERO CHAMPAGNE – Earlier PDO Champagne – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a) and (c) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Trade mark that contains a PDO – Products complying with the product specification of the PDO – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
9393

Case T-96/23: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2025 – Uniper Global Commodities v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – ACER decision on the amendment to the methodology for pricing balancing energy – Imposition of a temporary price limit – Appeal brought before the Board of Appeal of ACER – Specific conditions and arrangements concerning actions – Article 28(1) and Article 29 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility due to lack of standing to bring an appeal before the Board of Appeal – Plea of illegality – Equality before the law and effective judicial protection – Lack of individual concern – Attributes or factual circumstances not raised – Time limit for bringing proceedings – No excusable error)

cjeu_case ·
9394

Case T-95/23: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2025 – RWE Supply & Trading v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – ACER decision on the amendment to the methodology for pricing balancing energy – Imposition of a temporary price limit – Appeal brought before the Board of Appeal of ACER – Specific conditions and arrangements concerning actions – Article 28(1) and Article 29 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility due to lack of standing to bring an appeal before the Board of Appeal – Plea of illegality – Equality before the law and effective judicial protection – Lack of individual concern – Attributes or factual circumstances not raised – Time limit for bringing proceedings – No excusable error)

cjeu_case ·
9396

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 June 2025.#ClientEarth AISBL v Council of the European Union.#Common fisheries policy – Conservation of resources – Total allowable catches – Fish stocks shared with the United Kingdom – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the United Kingdom – Regulation (EU) 2022/515 – Request for internal review of an administrative act under environmental law – Article 2(1)(f) and Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Objective of achieving a maximum sustainable yield exploitation rate at the latest by 2020 for all stocks – Articles 2, 3, 9, 10, 15 and 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 – Socioeconomic and employment objectives – Best available scientific advice – Landing obligation – Mixed fisheries – Choke species – Precautionary approach – Ecosystem-based approach – Regulation (EU) 2019/472 – Target stocks – By-catches.#Case T-648/22.

cjeu_case ·
9397

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 June 2025.#ClientEarth AISBL v Council of the European Union.#Common fisheries policy – Conservation of resources – Total allowable catches – Fish stocks shared with the United Kingdom – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the United Kingdom – Regulation (EU) 2022/515 – Request for internal review of an administrative act under environmental law – Article 2(1)(f) and Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Objective of achieving a maximum sustainable yield exploitation rate at the latest by 2020 for all stocks – Articles 2, 3, 9, 10, 15 and 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 – Socioeconomic and employment objectives – Best available scientific advice – Landing obligation – Mixed fisheries – Choke species – Precautionary approach – Ecosystem-based approach – Regulation (EU) 2019/472 – Target stocks – By-catches.#Case T-648/22.

cjeu_case ·
9398

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 June 2025.#ClientEarth AISBL v Council of the European Union.#Common fisheries policy – Conservation of resources – Total allowable catches – Regulation (EU) 2022/109 – Request for internal review of an administrative act under environmental law – Article 2(1)(f) and Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Objective of achieving a maximum sustainable yield exploitation rate at the latest by 2020 for all stocks – Articles 2, 3, 9, 10, 15 and 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 – Socioeconomic and employment objectives – Best available scientific advice – Landing obligation – Mixed fisheries – Choke species – Precautionary approach – Ecosystem-based approach – Regulation (EU) 2018/973 – Regulation (EU) 2019/472 – Target stocks – By-catches.#Case T-577/22.

cjeu_case ·
9399

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 June 2025.#ClientEarth AISBL v Council of the European Union.#Common fisheries policy – Conservation of resources – Total allowable catches – Regulation (EU) 2022/109 – Request for internal review of an administrative act under environmental law – Article 2(1)(f) and Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Objective of achieving a maximum sustainable yield exploitation rate at the latest by 2020 for all stocks – Articles 2, 3, 9, 10, 15 and 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 – Socioeconomic and employment objectives – Best available scientific advice – Landing obligation – Mixed fisheries – Choke species – Precautionary approach – Ecosystem-based approach – Regulation (EU) 2018/973 – Regulation (EU) 2019/472 – Target stocks – By-catches.#Case T-577/22.

cjeu_case ·
9400

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2025.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – German air transport market – Public loan guaranteed by Germany to Condor Flugdienst in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Assessment of the damage – Direct causal link – Assessment of the amount of the aid – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-366/22.

cjeu_case ·