Документы: Европейский Союз

316836 документа
862

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#FIBO MARKETS Limited v J.P.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Conflicts of laws – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) – Applicable law – Consumer contracts – Exceptions – Financial contracts for differences (CFDs) – Rights and obligations which constitute a financial instrument – Process of setting prices for CFDs – Difference between the exchange rate deviation accepted in the consumer’s order and the exchange rate deviation in the transaction executed.#Case C-346/25.

cjeu_case ·
863

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Z.R. and Ś. v U. and Z.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Article 5(3) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Place where the harmful event occurred or may occur – Natural and legal persons claiming breach of their personality rights as a result of the broadcast of audiovisual content on television and on the internet – International jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State other than the Member State where that content was produced – Place where the damage occurred – Centre of interests of those persons – Content containing elements making it possible indirectly to identify a person as an individual – Action seeking measures to eliminate and preclude the effects of such a breach and seeking compensation for non-material damage.#Case C-232/25.

cjeu_case ·
868

Case C-346/25, Fibo Markets: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud – Czech Republic) – FIBO Markets LTD v J.P. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Conflicts of laws – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) – Applicable law – Consumer contracts – Exceptions – Financial contracts for differences (CFDs) – Rights and obligations which constitute a financial instrument – Process of setting prices for CFDs – Difference between the exchange rate deviation accepted in the consumer’s order and the exchange rate deviation in the transaction executed)

cjeu_case ·
869

Case C-232/25, Idziski: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – Z.R., Ś. v U., Z. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Article 5(3) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Place where the harmful event occurred or may occur – Natural and legal persons claiming breach of their personality rights as a result of the broadcast of audiovisual content on television and on the internet – International jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State other than the Member State where that content was produced – Place where the damage occurred – Centre of interests of those persons – Content containing elements making it possible indirectly to identify a person as an individual – Action seeking measures to eliminate and preclude the effects of such a breach and seeking compensation for non-material damage)

cjeu_case ·
870

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 18 juin 2026.#VK contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Agent temporaire – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Article 77 – Article 11, paragraphe 2, de l’annexe VIII – Article 5, paragraphe 1, sixième alinéa, des dispositions générales d’exécution des articles 11 et 12 de l’annexe VIII du statut relatifs au transfert de droits à pension – Pension d’ancienneté – Droits à pension acquis avant l’entrée au service de l’Union européenne – Délai dans lequel une demande de transfert vers le régime de pensions des institutions de l’Union doit être présentée – Rejet de la demande de transfert présentée hors délai – Circonstances exceptionnelles – Pandémie de COVID‑19.#Affaire C-880/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
871

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Belaruskali AAT and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds – Inclusion of the appellants’ names – Definition of ‘Lukashenko regime’ – Definition of persons ‘benefiting’ from or ‘supporting’ that regime – Obligation to state reasons – Principles of legal certainty and proportionality.#Joined Cases C-816/24 P to C-818/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
872

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 18 juin 2026.#Fachverband Eisenhüttenschlacken eV contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Règlement (UE) 2019/1009 – Article 42, paragraphes 7 et 8 – Mise à disposition sur le marché des fertilisants UE – Règlement délégué (UE) 2022/973 – Article 2, paragraphes 2 et 3 – Critères d’efficacité et de sécurité agronomiques pour l’utilisation de sous-produits dans les fertilisants UE – Valeurs limites de chrome et de vanadium dans les fertilisants UE utilisant comme sous-produits des scories ferreuses – Principe de précaution – Principe de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-754/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
873

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Penny Market Kft. v Komárom-Esztergom Vármegyei Kormányhivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products – Services in the internal market – National legislation imposing an obligation, for a specified period, on retailers of foodstuffs with a turnover in excess of a certain amount, to reduce the prices of certain foodstuffs and to have minimum quantities of those foodstuffs in stock – Measure taken as a result of a situation of emergency – Fines.#Case C-658/24.

cjeu_case ·
874

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 18 juin 2026.#Vodovody a kanalizace Přerov, a.s. contre Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Données ouvertes et réutilisation des informations du secteur public – Directive (UE) 2019/1024 – Article 2, point 3 – Compétence de la Cour – Notion d’“entreprise publique” – Entreprise détenue par plusieurs organismes du secteur public – Présomption d’“influence dominante” – Critères d’appréciation.#Affaire C-575/24.

cjeu_case ·
875

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Vodovody a kanalizace Přerov, a.s. v Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Open data and the re-use of public sector information – Directive (EU) 2019/1024 – Article 2(3) – Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice – Concept of ‘public undertaking’ – Undertaking owned by several public sector bodies – Presumption of ‘dominant influence’ – Criteria for assessment.#Case C-575/24.

cjeu_case ·
876

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#BG v Ministero della Difesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 1 – Purpose – Article 2(2)(a) and (b) – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of belief – National legislation requiring military personnel to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 – Difference in treatment based on membership of a particular professional category – Concept of ‘belief’.#Case C-522/24.

cjeu_case ·
877

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#BG v Ministero della Difesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 1 – Purpose – Article 2(2)(a) and (b) – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of belief – National legislation requiring military personnel to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 – Difference in treatment based on membership of a particular professional category – Concept of ‘belief’.#Case C-522/24.

cjeu_case ·
878

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#NTH Haustechnik GmbH v EM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(e) – Storage limitation – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing such data relating to a contract of employment in judicial proceedings – Article 17(3)(e) – No obligation to erase such data where processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims – Data collected by the employer with a view to proving a serious failure by the employee to comply with his or her obligations – Use of evidence obtained unlawfully.#Case C-484/24.

cjeu_case ·
879

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#NTH Haustechnik GmbH v EM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(e) – Storage limitation – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing such data relating to a contract of employment in judicial proceedings – Article 17(3)(e) – No obligation to erase such data where processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims – Data collected by the employer with a view to proving a serious failure by the employee to comply with his or her obligations – Use of evidence obtained unlawfully.#Case C-484/24.

cjeu_case ·
880

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 18 juin 2026.#Datenschutzbehörde et Dr. G S.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des personnes physiques à l’égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel – Règlement (UE) 2016/679 – Articles 77 et 79 – Voies de recours – Exercice parallèle – Articulation entre l’introduction d’une réclamation auprès d’une autorité nationale de contrôle et l’exercice d’un recours juridictionnel – Risque de décisions contradictoires – Principe de protection juridictionnelle effective – Autonomie procédurale des États membres – Principe d’effectivité – Principe d’équivalence.#Affaire C-414/24.

cjeu_case ·