Документы: Европейский Союз

316836 документа
671

Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 30 juin 2026.#Puma SE contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-278/26 P.

cjeu_case ·
674

Case C-278/26 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 June 2026 Appeal brought on 1 April 2026 by Puma SE against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 January 2026 – T-43/25, Puma v EUIPO – Ningbo Gongfang Commercial Management (Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)

cjeu_case ·
676

Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators v Swissgrid AG.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-872/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
678

Case C-555/25, Gutova: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – RL v AL (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·